search for: dodd

...O=TCP SPT=45257 DPT=80 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 If I add the following rule DNAT net:99.88.77.666 loc:192.168.1.76 tcp 80 This kind of works, but it is very slow and the complete web page does not get displayed Has anyone seen this problem before ? Graham -- Graham K. Dodd Director of Operations Falk & Ross GmbH Tel: 06301 717 0

...is very very slowwwww Both the live and develop web servers have the default route set I defined the 3rd IP address on eth0 as follows: ifconfig eth0:2 81.200.97.51 netmask 255.255.255.252 Does anyone have any ideas what I have done wrong or where I can look next Thanks, Graham -- Graham K. Dodd Director of Operations Falk & Ross GmbH Tel: 06301 717 0

Hello Darren, Could you comment on this issue being raised by myself and Corinna Vinschen? This will create big problems for me. I'm not clear if this is a conscious decision supported by solid reasons or if it is just collateral damage. Thank you for all you work! Jack DoDDs -------- Original Message -------- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:31:03 +0200 Subject: Re: Announce: OpenSSH 7.5 released From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org On Mar 24 12:38, Jack Dodds wrote: > Hello, > > You seem to be saying that in...

...DST=10.7.18.5 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=50 ID=4229 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1888 DPT=80 WIND OW=32768 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Can somebody explain why this packet is being dropped as the Source address is a "good" address and does not appear in the rfc1918 file thank you, Graham -- Graham K. Dodd Director of Operations Falk & Ross GmbH Tel: 06301 717 0

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1927 Matthew N. Dodd <matthew.nygard.dodd at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2076|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #1...

...ed, but it seems to ignore /etc/lmhosts > > How can I identify samba's root from an RPM installation? > > > Graham > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maurice Lefebvre [SMTP:lefebvre@mercure.umh.ac.be] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 1998 15:25 > To: graham.dodd@ramstein.af.mil > Subject: Re: /etc/lmhosts > > Do you set up any info in the name resolve order param of smb.conf. use > testparm to check it. > > Anyway, the location of the lmhosts is determine at the compilation > process, > when you define Samba root. It's in the...

Hi, I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ? -- Dave

...22 0.61385728 how can I change the output to a single column? like [1] 0.74140534 [2] 0.72464895 [3] 0.74873373 [4] 0.78313611 [5] 0.78836470 etc... Many many thanks Jennifer ------------------------------------------------------ Jennifer Dodd Scottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment (SCENE) Loch Lomond Glasgow G63 0AW Tel: 01360 870271 , . ~ ~ . .''@ )) .. ''..~ > - ~`` ''~\{...

Hi, guys, I got the below error message when i typed this command in terminal "rackup config.ru" , the file config.ru is rails ''s configuration file. You have already activated rack 1.3.2, but your Gemfile requires rack 1.2.3. Consider using bundle exec. (Gem::LoadError) So, how should i do , thanks a lot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

...I thought the R developers would be interested in the fact that their work is being used elsewhere, and I also wanted to say thanks for some code I do NOT want to have to write myself! The "crate" (Rust's name for a package) is at https://lib.rs/crates/r_stats. Best wishes Richard Dodd

I am faced with a network that needs to autoswitch to isdn should T-1 go down. After a shorewall search it looks to be quite a deal with routing config with linux. Like scripts written to deal with knowing the T-1 is down. I looked into a cisco router that does this. around $3000 This network has used shorewall as the gateway for 4 years now. Currently Fedora as op. system. It appears to me

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1326 Summary: Allow non-public-key credentials in authorized_keys file (Kerberos, etc.) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1927 Matthew N. Dodd <matthew.nygard.dodd at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|5.8p2 |-current -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching...

...to allow all traffic in both directions so I haven''t added a general policy for vpn. Would these rules be correct to forward ssh from the tunnel to the local server: ACCEPT vpn loc:192.168.x.x tcp 22 ACCEPT loc:192.168.x.x vpn tcp 22 Thank you for any help Graham -- Graham K. Dodd Director of Operations Falk & Ross GmbH Tel: 06301 717 0

...t ? I''m not a fan of bleeding-edge in production and I don''t go for "v2 must be better than v1 because it''s newer" Tom, if you have a few minutes, what''s new in 2.0 that I don''t get in 1.4.1 thanks for all comments, Graham -- Graham K. Dodd Director of Operations Falk & Ross GmbH Tel: 06301 717 0

Hi! How are you executing dovecot-lda? I can get 'MAILER-DAEMON' if I omit -f sender-address-here parameter. Aki > On 14 September 2018 at 08:46 David Dodd <dave at ci.com.au> wrote: > > > To get out of the problem this bug was causing I have now downgraded the > affectect servers to using dovecot 2.2.36 & dovecot-pigeonhole 0.4.24 . > > These versions work correctly for me. > > Has anyone else been able to see th...

Can you provide some instructions on how to reproduce this issue, because I wasn't able to. Aki > On 17 September 2018 at 01:28 David Dodd <dave at ci.com.au> wrote: > > > You are correct, omitting the -f option results in the From being set to > MAILER-DAEMON however dovecot-lda is being executed with the -d and the -f > option by my sendmail. > > In my sendmail confgiuration I have... > > FEATURE...

Hi all; I'm using samba 3.2 with smbldap-tools ( not ldapsam:*, but dosen't works too ), until that i work with centos 4 and debian etch's samba, I always set the same configuration and works fine, but with debian lenny ( 3.2.5 ) i getting problems with privileges, and i set one user ( "administrator" ) with all privileges this user can't open gpedit.msc ou change

Hi I have a PDC with an LDAP backend that i want to use SWAT to give users the option to change their password via the web interface. I cant seem to be able to get SWAT to authenticate any users it always gives me an authorization error. Is swat with an LDAP backend supported? Cheers. David.

Gives GSSAPI-MIC the same options capability currently provided for public key logins by the AuthorizedKeysFile. Uses krb5_principal_match() to support widcard matches. Uses percent_expand() to expand tokens for: credential USER[/INSTANCE]@REALM homedir /home/user username user cred name USER cred instance INSTANCE cred realm REALM My intended application: # cat