Displaying 20 results from an estimated 72 matches for "do_set".
Did you mean:
do_get
2005 Jun 27
2
R v2.1.1 for Windows and "non-reproducible" crashes
...semethod
100A9E1A R.dll:100A9E1A do_usemethod
1008494A R.dll:1008494A Rf_eval
100875AB R.dll:100875AB Rf_applyClosure
100846E0 R.dll:100846E0 Rf_eval
10051EE9 R.dll:10051EE9 Rf_endcontext
1008751F R.dll:1008751F Rf_applyClosure
100846E0 R.dll:100846E0 Rf_eval
10086305 R.dll:10086305 do_set
1008494A R.dll:1008494A Rf_eval
100863D5 R.dll:100863D5 do_begin
1008494A R.dll:1008494A Rf_eval
100875AB R.dll:100875AB Rf_applyClosure
100A9361 R.dll:100A9361 do_internal
100A99A5 R.dll:100A99A5 Rf_usemethod
100A9E1A R.dll:100A9E1A do_usemethod
1008494A R.dll:1008494A Rf_eval
1008...
2015 Feb 05
2
Invalid read of size 8
...nd shows the following error on the second block of Rprintf:
Later Cov Extra 3 0x107df7fb8
==954== Invalid read of size 8
==954== at 0xA92D599: NPHDPHMM (in /Users/NPHDPHMM.so)
==954== by 0x8632A: do_dotcall (dotcode.c:652)
==954== by 0xB036A: Rf_eval (eval.c:657)
==954== by 0xBE8C0: do_set (eval.c:2028)
==954== by 0xB0404: Rf_eval (eval.c:629)
==954== by 0xBE3C4: do_begin (eval.c:1638)
==954== by 0xB0404: Rf_eval (eval.c:629)
==954== by 0xBB95D: Rf_applyClosure (eval.c:1038)
==954== by 0xB03BC: Rf_eval (eval.c:676)
==954== by 0xBE8C0: do_set (eval.c:2028)
==954==...
2007 Mar 07
3
Garbage collector crashes after calling a C function
...s record 11 of 42
==9370== at 0x4A19D35: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==9370== by 0x84490E0: ???
==9370== by 0x844D346: ???
==9370== by 0x4BBE1A2: do_dotCode (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)
==9370== by 0x4BE9035: Rf_eval (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)
==9370== by 0x4BEBA3F: do_set (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)
==9370== by 0x4BE8E5E: Rf_eval (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)
==9370== by 0x4BEAF0D: do_begin (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)
==9370== by 0x4BE8E5E: Rf_eval (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)
==9370== by 0x4BE9711: Rf_applyClosure (in /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so)...
2006 Jul 05
1
i suspect that there a memory leak in "vmmin"?
...l=00000202
Call stack:
100DEC2F R.dll:100DEC2F SET_TAG
100E0527 R.dll:100E0527 Rf_allocVector
100E0D37 R.dll:100E0D37 R_alloc
100F2ACA R.dll:100F2ACA vmmin
023F5E96 gem.dll:023F5E96 weibullMH
10088C33 R.dll:10088C33 do_dotcall
100B8827 R.dll:100B8827 Rf_eval
100BA4D2 R.dll:100BA4D2 do_set
100B86CB R.dll:100B86CB Rf_eval
100BA5D5 R.dll:100BA5D5 do_begin
100B86CB R.dll:100B86CB Rf_eval
100BB8EB R.dll:100BB8EB Rf_applyClosure
100B85F8 R.dll:100B85F8 Rf_eval
100BA4D2 R.dll:100BA4D2 do_set
100B86CB R.dll:100B86CB Rf_eval
100DB51C R.dll:100DB51C Rf_ReplIteration
100DBAA6...
2011 Feb 13
2
Recoding using the memisc package
...-> 2.9,
22 -> 3.0,
23 -> 3.1,
24 -> 3.2,
25 -> 3.3,
26 -> 3.4)
})
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I keep get error message saying "Error in 0.9 <- 1 : invalid (do_set)
left-hand side to assignment." Any idea what is going on? Thanks.
Best,
Shige
2003 Apr 16
0
vignette segfault bt
...c:418
#14 0x080a3db2 in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x8954ae0, op=0x883d4ec,
arglist=0x9207f64, rho=0x9208338, suppliedenv=0x81f65c0) at
eval.c:609
#15 0x080a3937 in Rf_eval (e=0x8954ae0, rho=0x9208338) at eval.c:453
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#16 0x080a5685 in do_set (call=0x8954a8c, op=0x9208338, args=0x8954aa8,
rho=0x9208338) at eval.c:1283
#17 0x080a3b28 in Rf_eval (e=0x8954a8c, rho=0x9208338) at eval.c:418
#18 0x080a586b in Rf_evalList (el=0x8954a1c, rho=0x9208338) at
eval.c:1372
#19 0x080a3a50 in Rf_eval (e=0x8954a00, rho=0x9208338) at eval.c:439
#20 0...
2008 Oct 03
1
Memory crash
...duplicate.c:214
#3 0x00000000004e1775 in do_makelist (call=<value optimized out>,
op=<value optimized out>, args=0x1e18238, rho=<value optimized out>)
at builtin.c:645
#4 0x000000000054697a in Rf_eval (e=0x10685a0, rho=0x1c557e0) at eval.c:492
#5 0x000000000054a7ef in do_set (call=0x10684f8, op=0x936188,
args=0x1068530,
rho=0x1c557e0) at eval.c:1424
#6 0x0000000000546896 in Rf_eval (e=0x10684f8, rho=0x1c557e0) at eval.c:463
#7 0x00000000005474c0 in do_begin (call=0x1089ab0, op=0x936ef8,
args=0x10684c0, rho=0x1c557e0) at eval.c:1176
#8 0x0000000000546896 i...
2017 Feb 22
0
Crash in the latest release
...rneau/Rlib/lme4/libs/lme4.so)
==31901== by 0xD8727F1: merPredDCreate (in /home/therneau/Rlib/lme4/libs/lme4.so)
==31901== by 0x80C0B9E: R_doDotCall (dotcode.c:648)
==31901== by 0x80C159F: do_dotcall (dotcode.c:1252)
==31901== by 0x80FFABA: Rf_eval (eval.c:728)
==31901== by 0x810308A: do_set (eval.c:2579)
==31901== by 0x80FF907: Rf_eval (eval.c:700)
==31901== Address 0xe310828 is 0 bytes after a block of size 2,408 alloc'd
==31901== at 0x402A6DC: operator new(unsigned int) (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==31901== by 0xD872770: merPredDCreate (in /...
2017 Feb 22
0
[Lme4-authors] Crash in the latest release
...> ==31901== by 0xD8727F1: merPredDCreate (in
> /home/therneau/Rlib/lme4/libs/lme4.so)
> ==31901== by 0x80C0B9E: R_doDotCall (dotcode.c:648)
> ==31901== by 0x80C159F: do_dotcall (dotcode.c:1252)
> ==31901== by 0x80FFABA: Rf_eval (eval.c:728)
> ==31901== by 0x810308A: do_set (eval.c:2579)
> ==31901== by 0x80FF907: Rf_eval (eval.c:700)
> ==31901== Address 0xe310828 is 0 bytes after a block of size 2,408 alloc'd
> ==31901== at 0x402A6DC: operator new(unsigned int) (in
> /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
> ==31901== by 0xD8727...
2012 Feb 03
2
Hanging -- please help decipher event report
...0x10013dca6]
19 Rf_eval + 1196 (in libR.dylib)
[0x10013ca1c]
19 do_begin + 308 (in libR.dylib)
[0x100141724]
19 Rf_eval + 1196 (in libR.dylib)
[0x10013ca1c]
19 do_set + 709 (in libR.dylib)
[0x10013ea55]
19 Rf_eval + 962 (in libR.dylib)
[0x10013c932]
19 Rf_applyClosure + 724 (in
libR.dylib) [0x10013f364]
19 Rf_eval + 1196 (in
libR.dylib) [...
2006 May 09
1
Seg fault when installing package from bad repository
...fd64) at
../../../../R-2.3.0/src/main/internet.c:99
#8 0x010cefc4 in do_internal (call=0x18c3b50, op=0xbfff2a03,
args=0x0, env=0x18cfd64) at ../../../../R-2.3.0/src/main/names.c:1089
#9 0x0109d798 in Rf_eval (e=0x18d0040, rho=0x18cfd64) at
../../../../R-2.3.0/src/main/eval.c:391
#10 0x0109f87c in do_set (call=0x18d17b0, op=0x180a190,
args=0x18d0008, rho=0x18cfd64) at
../../../../R-2.3.0/src/main/eval.c:1303
#11 0x0109d798 in Rf_eval (e=0x18d17b0, rho=0x18cfd64) at
../../../../R-2.3.0/src/main/eval.c:391
#12 0x0109d798 in Rf_eval (e=0x18d16b4, rho=0x18cfd64) at
../../../../R-2.3.0/src/main/eval.c:3...
2001 Jan 23
0
1.2.1 segfault
...a94d0, generic=0x1632e8 "[",
args=0x3a94b4, rho=0xd9da48, ans=0xefffc1c4, dropmissing=0) at eval.c:1386
#7 0xbea40 in do_subset (call=0x3a94d0, op=0x1c3754, args=0x3a94b4,
rho=0xd9da48) at subset.c:471
#8 0x56aa0 in Rf_eval (e=0x3a94d0, rho=0xd9da48) at eval.c:317
#9 0x582c0 in do_set (call=0x3a95cc, op=0x1c3834, args=0x3a95b0, rho=0xd9da48)
at eval.c:1008
#10 0x56aa0 in Rf_eval (e=0x3a95cc, rho=0xd9da48) at eval.c:317
#11 0x57c8c in do_begin (call=0x3c0e84, op=0x1c37c4, args=0x3a96e4,
rho=0xd9da48) at eval.c:803
#12 0x56aa0 in Rf_eval (e=0x3c0e84, rho=0xd9da48) at eval....
2003 May 14
2
abrupt end to R
...77c13730 esp=0022d5ac ebp=0022d7f8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na po nc
cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 efl=00000246
Call stack:
77C13730 msvcrt.dll:77C13730 strlen
004C799D R.dll:004C799D do_dotcall
004DA35F R.dll:004DA35F Rf_eval
004DC2D5 R.dll:004DC2D5 do_set
004DA3C8 R.dll:004DA3C8 Rf_eval
004DBA52 R.dll:004DBA52 do_begin
004DA3C8 R.dll:004DA3C8 Rf_eval
004DA6B5 R.dll:004DA6B5 Rf_applyClosure
004DA1D7 R.dll:004DA1D7 Rf_eval
004DA949 R.dll:004DA949 Rf_applyClosure
004DAC5A R.dll:004DAC5A R_execMethod
10DA2B43 methods.dll:10DA2B43 R_stand...
2004 Sep 13
6
Spare some CPU cycles for testing lme?
If anyone has a few extra CPU cycles to spare,
I'd appreciate it if you could verify a problem that I
have encountered. Run the code
below and tell me if it crashes your R before
completion.
library(lme4)
data(bdf)
dump<-sapply( 1:50000, function(i) {
fm <- lme(langPOST ~ IQ.ver.cen + avg.IQ.ver.cen, data = bdf,
random = ~ IQ.ver.cen | schoolNR);
cat("
2003 Apr 05
0
sweave/gc segfault bt
...:418
#15 0x080a3fa5 in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x8955188, op=0x883db08,
arglist=0x94f5bbc, rho=0x94f57b0, suppliedenv=0x81f6ca0) at
eval.c:609
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#16 0x080a3b27 in Rf_eval (e=0x8955188, rho=0x94f57b0) at eval.c:453
#17 0x080a5895 in do_set (call=0x8955134, op=0x94f57b0, args=0x8955150,
rho=0x94f57b0) at eval.c:1283
#18 0x080a3d18 in Rf_eval (e=0x8955134, rho=0x94f57b0) at eval.c:418
#19 0x080a5a7b in Rf_evalList (el=0x89550c4, rho=0x94f57b0) at
eval.c:1372
#20 0x080a3c40 in Rf_eval (e=0x89550a8, rho=0x94f57b0) at eval.c:439
#21...
2024 Mar 02
1
capture "->"
That would have been an elegant solution, but it doesn't seem to work:
> `->` <- `+`
> 1 -> 3 # expecting 4
Error in 3 <- 1 : invalid (do_set) left-hand side to assignment
It is possible to reassign other multiple character operators:
> `%%` <- `+`
> 1 %% 3
[1] 4
The assignment operator `->` is so special for the R parser, that it seems
impossible to change.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 11:30?PM <avi.e.gross at gmail.com>...
1997 Nov 07
0
R-alpha: "invisible" : R_INVISIBLE .. -- repeat{} gives BOMB
...investigated some more:
> R_VISIBLE is set to 0 ``R_Visible = 0;''
> also in other places in eval.c :
>
> line C function
>
> 344: do_if
> 436: do_for
> 480: do_while
> 515: do_repeat
> 720: \
> 727: > do_set
> 738: /
> ^^^
>(line numbers from current 0.60)
>
>In my opinion, only the three cases in do_set ("<-" things) should have
>the invisibility flag...
In S-PLUS, for, while and repeat all return invisible answers, so for
compatibility these should probably be kep...
2005 May 24
0
Segmentation violation in eval.c (R 2.1.0) (PR#7893)
Hi,
I get a segmentation fault in eval.c:
do_set (call=0x8ce166c, op=0x82b43b8, args=0x8ce1650, rho=0x8acf218)
at eval.c:1309
1309 switch (NAMED(s)) {
The instruction is
0x080becf1 <do_set+177>: movzbl (%eax),%edx
and %eax contains a non-accessible address
(gdb) x/x $eax
0x4a5bf008: Cannot access memory at ad...
2003 Apr 21
0
sweave provoked segfault (PR#2809)
...053
#11 0x080a3b28 in Rf_eval (e=0x8324ef4, rho=0x8f385f0) at eval.c:418
#12 0x080a3db2 in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x878ef30, op=0x8324e14,
arglist=0x8dbc92c, rho=0x8f0bb0c, suppliedenv=0x81f65a0) at
eval.c:609
#13 0x080a3937 in Rf_eval (e=0x878ef30, rho=0x8f0bb0c) at eval.c:453
#14 0x080a5685 in do_set (call=0x878efd8, op=0x8f0bb0c, args=0x878efa0,
rho=0x8f0bb0c) at eval.c:1283
#15 0x080a3b28 in Rf_eval (e=0x878efd8, rho=0x8f0bb0c) at eval.c:418
#16 0x080a4f62 in do_begin (call=0x878f4ec, op=0x81fba7c,
args=0x878eff4,
rho=0x8f0bb0c) at eval.c:1072
---Type <return> to continue, or q...
2003 Mar 18
0
all.rda again
...hread 0 Crashed:
#0 0x0185095c in Rf_install (names.c:1024)
#1 0x01827d64 in R_execMethod (eval.c:721)
#2 0x013d6c38 in R_standardGeneric (methods_list_dispatch.c:630)
#3 0x00082d60 in do_standardGeneric (objects.c:1013)
#4 0x00057188 in Rf_eval (eval.c:441)
#5 0x00058f40 in do_set (eval.c:1281)
#6 0x00056fcc in Rf_eval (eval.c:418)
#7 0x00058810 in do_begin (eval.c:1055)
#8 0x00056fcc in Rf_eval (eval.c:418)
#9 0x00057614 in Rf_applyClosure (eval.c:609)
#10 0x00057200 in Rf_eval (eval.c:453)
#11 0x00058810 in do_begin (eval.c:1055)
#12 0x00056fcc in...