search for: dnskey

Default install with local_unbound and ntpd can't be functional with incorrect date/time in BIOS: Unbound requred correct time for DNSSEC check and refuseing queries ("Jul 1 20:17:29 yellowrat unbound: [3444:0] info: failed to prime trust anchor -- DNSKEY rrset is not secure . DNSKEY IN") ntpd don't have any numeric IP of ntp servers in ntp.conf -- only symbolic names like 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org, as result -- can't resolve (see above, about DNSKEY). IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP of public ntp servers. # date Tue Jul...

Default install with local_unbound and ntpd can't be functional with incorrect date/time in BIOS: Unbound requred correct time for DNSSEC check and refuseing queries ("Jul 1 20:17:29 yellowrat unbound: [3444:0] info: failed to prime trust anchor -- DNSKEY rrset is not secure . DNSKEY IN") ntpd don't have any numeric IP of ntp servers in ntp.conf -- only symbolic names like 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org, as result -- can't resolve (see above, about DNSKEY). IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP of public ntp servers. # date Tue Jul...

...grade to 2.7.5 I keep getting an error on fragment collection. The code is like below: @@concat::fragment{ "${name}" : target => "/etc/bind/named.conf.keys", content => template("dns/named.conf.keys.erb"), order => 10, tag => ''dnskey'' } Concat::Fragment <<| tag == ''dnskey'' |>> err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find type Concat::Fragment on node Is anybody facing the same kind of issue ? -- Bruno -- You received this message because...

...? validating @0xb48fdcd0: dlv.isc.org NSEC: verify failed due to bad signature (keyid=64263): RRSIG has expired 25-Mar-2020 16:26:25.828 dnssec: info:?? validating @0xb48fdcd0: dlv.isc.org NSEC: no valid signature found 25-Mar-2020 16:29:05.075 dnssec: info: validating @0xb473dc48: dlv.isc.org DNSKEY: verify failed due to bad signature (keyid=19297): RRSIG has expired 25-Mar-2020 16:29:05.075 dnssec: notice: validating @0xb473dc48: dlv.isc.org DNSKEY: unable to find a DNSKEY which verifies the DNSKEY RRset and also matches a trusted key for 'dlv.isc.org' 25-Mar-2020 16:29:05.075 dnss...

...rg NSEC: verify failed due to bad signature (keyid=64263): > RRSIG has expired > 25-Mar-2020 16:26:25.828 dnssec: info:???????? validating @0xb48fdcd0: > dlv.isc.org NSEC: no valid signature found > > 25-Mar-2020 16:29:05.075 dnssec: info: validating @0xb473dc48: > dlv.isc.org DNSKEY: verify failed due to bad signature (keyid=19297): > RRSIG has expired > 25-Mar-2020 16:29:05.075 dnssec: notice: validating @0xb473dc48: > dlv.isc.org DNSKEY: unable to find a DNSKEY which verifies the DNSKEY > RRset and also matches a trusted key for 'dlv.isc.org' > 25-M...

Is this mis-configuration, or just noise in my log? ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.056 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success: 1 Time(s) ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.120 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for 'dlv.isc.org': success: 1 Time(s) -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | (713)993-0671 ph. |...

...ng list operator can fix "well", and it's mainly based on the fact that DMARC was designed in a vacuum of anyone who actually understands mailing lists and/or anyone who uses or cares about them. http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=17891458 The summary here is that the DNSKEY that Yahoo signs the message with (and has nothing to do with SPF as was suggested above) is invalidated by the mailing list's need to comply with legalities of needing a footer with unsubscribe information, etc. By altering the message (as sent by yahoo) the checksum no longer matches and whe...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2119 Bug ID: 2119 Summary: SSHFP with DNSSEC ? no trust anchors given, validation always fails Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hello, after I did update all my CentOS6 boxes - VMs and router; two of them (one VM and the router) are my local DNS resolvers; and I'm using the DNSSECTLSAvalidator plugin from nic.cz: https://www.dnssec-validator.cz/ before the update this plugin worked using my resolvers, after the update I get: "Failure - bogus DNSSEC reply, DNSSEC validation not possible with current

This release is a bug fix release. Please see the README document for configuration and installation instructions. You can download NSD from http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ NSD 2.0.2 release notes: BUG FIXES: - Allow the use of a mnemonic for the algorithm field of a DNSKEY record. - Behavior of the zonec -v flag has been modified. By default zonec will only print a single line with a summary of the error count. - Bug #75: Fixed typo in previous "fix".

...ll", and > it's mainly based on the fact that DMARC was designed in a vacuum of > anyone who actually understands mailing lists and/or anyone who uses or > cares about them. > > http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=17891458 > > The summary here is that the DNSKEY that Yahoo signs the message with > (and has nothing to do with SPF as was suggested above) is invalidated > by the mailing list's need to comply with legalities of needing a footer > with unsubscribe information, etc. By altering the message (as sent by > yahoo) the checksum no lo...

...s (serial 2016121200) 27-Dec-2019 23:20:21.227 notify: info: zone ixsdns.de/IN: sending notifies (serial 2018010102) *27-Dec-2019 23:20:28.434 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure* 27-Dec-2019 23:20:28.444 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.219 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: no valid signature found 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.714 dnssec: info:?? validating ./SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure 27-Dec-2019 23:20:29.957 dnssec: info: validating ./NS: no va...

...these days I added a few zones needed for DDNS; this works but in /etc/ I found quite a strange file, I'm not sure if it was in use at the beginning I used this system as a DNS-Server, and after several 'yum update' not any more; /etc/named.root.key with this content managed-keys { # DNSKEY for the root zone. # Updates are published on root-dnssec-announce at icann.org . initial-key 257 3 8 "AwEAAagAIKlVZrpC6Ia7gEzahOR+9W29euxhJhVVLOyQbSEW0O8gcCjF FVQUTf6v58fLjwBd0YI0EzrAcQqBGCzh/RStIoO8g0NfnfL2MTJRkxoX bfDaUeVPQuYEhg37NZWAJQ9VnMVDxP/VHL496M/QZxkjf5/Efucp2gaD X6RS6CXpoY68LsvPVjR0...

...smb.conf and named.conf for your reference. Few things I wish to clarify here. 1. We have installed the samba on CentOS 7.4 not on Debian OS. As, packages from repositories are of version 4.3 and 4.4, we have used sources, compiled & installed the package. 2. named.log had an entry "DNSKEY (.) could not be obtained, Time Out". But named-checkconf did not return any errors. 3. We did run dbcheck and dbcheck --cross-ncs. It threw some erros. We fixed it. Yet, DNS could not resolve. We are now simulating the production environment in our testing virtual machines. We are trying...

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] >> > >> > For some

Hi Anantha, > The upgrade from 4.6.5 broke all the servers. Although the services were > running and there is no error message, DNS resolution failed. Even from > inside the domain controllers, DNS queries failed. > > Samba Version 4.7.1 and Named Version 9.9.4. The same issue happened > with samba version 4.7.3 and 4.7.4 > > We had to revert back to 4.6.5 to bring the

Greetings, Unbound 1.4.20 OS X 10.8.4 - Server NSD 3.2.15 I have installed 'unbound' and it works nicely on my client (test purpose) - Client is MacBook Air. I have installed NSD (will be in replacement of BIND) on said client. All is good but when i try to start NSD Error --> nsd can't bind udp socket: address already in use. Everything is configured to bind to 127.0.0.1. #

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the

....0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN: loaded serial 0 Feb 15 09:28:54 dc1 named[3673]: all zones loaded Feb 15 09:28:54 dc1 named[3673]: running Feb 15 09:28:54 dc1 systemd[1]: Started Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS). Feb 15 09:29:04 dc1 named[3673]: managed-keys-zone: Unable to fetch DNSKEY set '.': timed out Feb 15 09:29:04 dc1 named[3673]: resolver priming query complete I still cannot find the mandatory DNS records. Re-provisioning Samba AD DC again. # cd /usr/local/samba/etc # mv smb.conf smb.conf.bak # samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [TE...