Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "dmagda".
Did you mean:
magda
2010 Jan 25
0
smbd not talking to winbindd?
...mappings. We're talking to a
Windows 2008R2 server, with AD in "2003 mode" I believe.
What the issue appears to be is that smbd does not seem to want to talk
with winbindd. One moment my account worked:
[2010/01/25 08:13:07, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:745(ntlmssp_server_auth)
Got user=[dmagda] domain=[ADS] workstation=[TOR123] len1=24 len2=24
[2010/01/25 08:13:07, 3] auth/auth.c:222(check_ntlm_password)
check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user
[ADS]\[dmagda]@[TOR123] with the new password interface
[2010/01/25 08:13:07, 3] auth/auth.c:225(check_ntlm_password)
chec...
2009 Mar 04
5
Oracle database on zfs
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a guideline on how to configure ZFS on a server
with Oracle database?
We are experiencing some slowness on writes to ZFS filesystem. It take about
530ms to write a 2k data.
We are running Solaris 10 u5 127127-11 and the back-end storage is a RAID5
EMC EMX.
This is a small database with about 18gb storage allocated.
Is there a tunable parameters that we can apply to
2009 Oct 28
4
compiling 3.2.15: cifs.upcall not found afer RPM build
Hello,
Trying to compile Samba 3.2.15 on a RHEL AS 4u2 (i686) and I'm getting the
following result from 'sh makerpms.sh':
> Provides: samba-doc = 3.2.15-1
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <=
3.0.3-1
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> File not found:
2009 Feb 17
32
Backing up ZFS snapshots
I have an OpenSolaris snv_105 server at home that holds my photos,
docs, music, etc, in a zfs pool. I backup my laptops with rsync to the
OpenSolaris server. All of my important data is in one place, on the
OpenSolaris server. I want to backup this data. I want to protect
against losing my data, and I would also like to recover previous
versions of files when I make mistakes.
* I do not have a
2011 Jun 10
1
Braindead Autoreply filters...
On 2011-06-10 2:00 PM, Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info> wrote:
> Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> It's not clear to me... are ALL autoresponders "braindead" or are there
>> some that don't notice it's a mailing list contacting them?
> Some auto-responders look at the to: field and if it's not directly sent
> to the recipient's address (i.e.
2011 Jun 14
10
ZFS for Linux?
Hello,
A college friend of mine is using Debian Linux on his desktop,
and wondered if he could tap into ZFS goodness without adding
another server in his small quiet apartment or changing the
desktop OS. According to his research, there are some kernel
modules for Debian which implement ZFS, or a FUSE variant.
Can anyone comment how stable and functional these are?
Performance is a
2010 Nov 23
14
ashift and vdevs
zdb -C shows an shift value on each vdev in my pool, I was just wondering if
it is vdev specific, or pool wide. Google didn''t seem to know.
I''m considering a mixed pool with some "advanced format" (4KB sector)
drives, and some normal 512B sector drives, and was wondering if the ashift
can be set per vdev, or only per pool. Theoretically, this would save me
some size on
2009 Nov 02
24
dedupe is in
Deduplication was committed last night by Mr. Bonwick:
> Log message:
> PSARC 2009/571 ZFS Deduplication Properties
> 6677093 zfs should have dedup capability
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-November/010683.html
Via c0t0d0s0.org.
2010 Nov 18
9
WarpDrive SLP-300
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/index.html
Good stuff for ZFS.
Fred
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20101117/d48186f0/attachment.html>
2009 Mar 28
53
Can this be done?
I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1.
I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1
Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two
raid5''s striped (in raid terms?)
Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running
snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110.
If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command
lines to
2010 Aug 28
5
native ZFS on Linux
This just popped up:
> In terms of how native ZFS for Linux is being handled by [KQ
> Infotec], they are releasing their ported ZFS code under the Common
> Development & Distribution License and will not be attempting to go
> for mainline integration. Instead, this company will just be
> releasing their CDDL source-code as a build-able kernel module for
> users and
2004 Jun 10
1
multiple connections
...>: icmp: echo request
07:35:44.997944 <Dest IP> > <Static IP>: icmp: echo request
07:35:46.003377 <Dest IP> > <Static IP>: icmp: echo request
No responses come back though.
Any suggestions?
[1] http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html
--
David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/
Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under
the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well
under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI
_______________________________________________
LA...
2010 Aug 13
32
ZFS development moving behind closed doors
If this information is correct,
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=133043
further development of ZFS will take place behind closed doors.
Opensolaris will become the internal development version of Solaris
with no public distributions. The community has been abandoned.
--
-Gary Mills- -Unix Group- -Computer and Network Services-
2010 Mar 18
13
ZFS/OSOL/Firewire...
An interesting thing I just noticed here testing out some Firewire drives with OpenSolaris.
Setup :
OpenSolaris 2009.06 and a dev version (snv_129)
2 500Gb Firewire 400 drives with integrated hubs for daisy-chaining (net: 4 devices on the chain)
- one SATA bridge
- one PATA bridge
Created a zpool with both drives as simple vdevs
Started a zfs send/recv to backup a local filesystem
Watching
2010 Apr 10
41
Secure delete?
Hi all
Is it possible to securely delete a file from a zfs dataset/zpool once it''s been snapshotted, meaning "delete (and perhaps overwrite) all copies of this file"?
Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy at karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et element?rt imperativ
2009 Apr 19
21
[on-discuss] Reliability at power failure?
Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>
> I would suggest that you follow my recipe: not check the boot-archive
> during a reboot. And then report back. (I''m assuming that that will take
> several weeks)
>
We are back at square one; or, at the subject line.
I did a zpool status -v, everything was hunky dory.
Next, a power failure, 2 hours later, and this is what zpool status
2009 Mar 18
24
rename(2), atomicity, crashes and fsync()
Hi all,
Recently there''s been discussion [1] in the Linux community about how
filesystems should deal with rename(2), particularly in the case of a crash.
ext4 was found to truncate files after a crash, that had been written with
open("foo.tmp"), write(), close() and then rename("foo.tmp", "foo"). This is
because ext4 uses delayed allocation and may not
2009 Jun 15
33
compression at zfs filesystem creation
Hi,
I just installed 2009.06 and found that compression isn''t enabled by default when filesystems are created. Does is make sense to have an RFE open for this? (I''ll open one tonight if need be.) We keep telling people to turn on compression. Are there any situations where turning on compression doesn''t make sense, like rpool/swap? what about rpool/dump?
Thanks,
~~sa
2010 Apr 07
53
ZFS RaidZ recommendation
I have been searching this forum and just about every ZFS document i can find trying to find the answer to my questions. But i believe the answer i am looking for is not going to be documented and is probably best learned from experience.
This is my first time playing around with open solaris and ZFS. I am in the midst of replacing my home based filed server. This server hosts all of my media
2007 Nov 03
0
CIFS/SMB in (Open)Solaris kernel
Hello all,
In case you missed it:
> We already had the basic CIFS service building on Solaris but it
> took another 8 months, 22 more ARC cases, a lot of helping hands
> and many late nights to deliver the project. On October 25th, 2007,
> the CIFS service project putback over 800 files, approximately
> 370,000 lines of code (including 180,000 lines of new code) to the