Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "distc".
Did you mean:
dist
2006 Apr 19
3
isoMDS and 0 distances
...stB[which(distB==0)] <- NA
isoA <- isoMDS(distB, cmdsA)
initial value 21.835691
final value 21.835691
converged
The other approach I've tried is replacing the 0's with small numbers.
In this case isoMDS does reduce the stress values.
min(distA[which(distA>0)])
[1] 0.02325581
distC <- distA
distC[which(distC==0)] <- 0.001
isoC <- isoMDS(distC)
initial value 21.682854
iter 5 value 16.862093
iter 10 value 16.451800
final value 16.339224
converged
So my questions are: what am I doing wrong in the first example? Why
does isoMDS converge without doing anything? Is...
2009 Feb 08
2
Strange behavior of C compiled program
...mClus=%f",mTraj[i+nbId*c],mClustersCenter[j+nbClusters*c]);
Rprintf("\nDistA=%d Tmp=%d",dist,tmp);
tmp = mTraj[i+nbId* c] - mClustersCenter [j+nbClusters* c];
Rprintf("\nDistB=%d Tmp=%d",dist,tmp);
dist += (tmp * tmp);
Rprintf("\nDistC=%d Tmp=%d",dist,tmp);
--- 8< ----
Herer are the stranges results it gives :
XXXX mTraj=1.000000 mClus=3.000000
DistA=0 Tmp=0
DistB=0 Tmp=0
DistC=0 Tmp=1074790400
I ask on a C chat, but no one can answer me.
Any idea of what wrong ?
Thanks
Christophe