search for: distaster

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50 matches for "distaster".

Did you mean: disaster
2016 Sep 08
5
DNF update
On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. > CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different than what he already knows. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
2008 Mar 01
10
Send in your favorite CentOS slogan today
Hi everyone, The CentOS project is looking for more slogans that may end up on promotional material (eg media, flyers, posters or stickers). We already collected a few funny, ironic, sarcastic or even distasteful ones. Feel free to visit our Slogans wiki page for a good laugh or rude offenses and add your own slogan by sending them to this thread. See: http://wiki.centos.org/Promo/Slogans
2002 Sep 30
0
End Chinese Censorship at Yahoo!
Dear Friends, I read in a September 2002 edition of the Economist Magazine that Yahoo! (www.yahoo.com) has signed an agreement with the Chinese government to censor searches on their web site for consumers in China. I am very disappointed in Yahoo! and hope you are too. To let my distaste be known, I am writing Yahoo! and closing my email accounts and un-subscribing from Yahoo!-based mailing
2003 Dec 01
1
Linus "praise" for Xen
http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20031201_243.html --- Relevant section --- Nuno Silva mentioned: The good people at Cambridge made a (very nice) VMM that exploits ring0/1/3 to let one machine run various kernels independently (the kernels need to be ported to the xen arch). Xen itself executes in ring0 and the "guest" operating systems execute in ring1.
2009 Jun 05
7
Reporting a Complaint
I'm sorry my first post is along these lines, but I recently made a bug report regarding a game running in Wine and was, in rather unfriendly words, informed that I had posted in an incorrect bug report by a developer. I subsequently started a new bug report for the problem and was replied to by that same developer from the first bug. He replied in more, rather unfriendly, terms and
2009 Jan 21
11
[PATCH] x86: change IO-APIC ack method default for single IO-APIC systems
Ever since 3.0.2 we''ve been carrying this patch in our products. Since there was no indication that there would be anything wrong with the ''new'' IO-APIC ack method added back then, we finally decided to drop this patch recently from SLE11, to find that the subsequent release candidate failed to work on at least on system without using "ioapic_ack=old". With
2012 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] How to represent __attribute__((fastcall)) functions in the IL
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 19 October 2012 17:00, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> That said, I also don't like the idea of filling the IR with tons of target >> specific stuff. > > In this case, I think it's even worse than "aapcs" or "fastcall", that > are
2008 Jan 31
1
RFC: ssh-copy-id tweaks
I'd like to propose a couple of tweaks to ssh-copy-id: o Change the default ID_FILE from identity.pub to id_dsa.pub or perhaps {id_dsa,id_rsa,identity}.pub to cover all the bases, although the patch below deals only with id_dsa.pub - it would need some more tweaking to deal with more than one (possibly non-existent) file. o If the destination authorized_keys file already contains the
2012 Oct 20
4
[LLVMdev] How to represent __attribute__((fastcall)) functions in the IL
On 19 October 2012 17:00, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > That said, I also don't like the idea of filling the IR with tons of target > specific stuff. In this case, I think it's even worse than "aapcs" or "fastcall", that are target dependent, but at a higher level. Proposing at which register each variable will be, forces the front-ends to
2015 Jan 10
2
C-6, Gnome question
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 15:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:34:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 09:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > Using the default Gnome desktop on Centos-6, I keep having
2014 Mar 17
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Simple control-flow integrity
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Tom Roeder <tmroeder at google.com> wrote: > > > > I'm definitely interested in removing the inline asm bits. I'm not > > sure what you mean by a pseudo-plt, though; do you mean hooking into > > the code that generates the Procedure
2009 May 04
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add support for accessing the FS segment register on X86
On May 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > Hello, > > The preferred way to do TLS is to use the thread_local keyword. > There is x86-64 support for thread_local on ELF; if you need > it for other targets, I recommend looking at adapting it. That said, the X86 backend supporting access off FS is general goodness, right? -Chris
2014 Sep 04
0
Offer of Tripplite OMNIVS1500XL to official nut developer
Hi all, I gave up on a Tripplite OMNIVS1500XL due to it failing to work on the version of Nut in FreeNAS (and having experienced numerous issues on Debian Jessie as well due to incomplete/unknown protocol elements causing USB problems and Debian Wheezy doesn't even recognize the device). Since the issue is likely lack of information (i.e. unknown protocol) I'm not sure my offer of device
2015 Jan 11
0
C-6, Gnome question
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > <snip> > > > Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the > > thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered > > over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it
2016 Sep 08
0
DNF update
On Wed, September 7, 2016 9:59 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >>> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. >> CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. > > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different > than what he already knows. > Your, comment is probably correct: with this long frustration Mr.
2016 Sep 08
0
DNF update
On 2016-09-08, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >>> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. >> CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. > > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different > than what he already knows. Don't we all? I'm not really all that excited about
2004 Aug 06
0
and and in stats.log
minutes gets repeated at nice_time_minutes. patch attached -- Jose Celestino <japc@co.sapo.pt> SysAdmin::SAPO.pt http://www.sapo.pt ----------------------------------------------------- "Lately, the only thing keeping me from becoming a serial killer is my distaste for manual labor." -- Dilbert -------------- next part -------------- *** icecast-1.3.12/src/ice_string.c
2004 Aug 06
0
and and in stats.log
minutes gets repeated at nice_time_minutes. patch attached -- Jose Celestino <japc@co.sapo.pt> SysAdmin::SAPO.pt http://www.sapo.pt ----------------------------------------------------- "Lately, the only thing keeping me from becoming a serial killer is my distaste for manual labor." -- Dilbert -------------- next part -------------- *** icecast-1.3.12/src/ice_string.c
2002 Jan 22
1
ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch and 2.4.18 pre 4
The ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch applies with 0 fuzz against both 2.4.18 pre 4 and 2.4.18 pre3-ac2. Will it be included into 2.4.18 pre 5? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 "Debugging is
2007 May 29
1
best practicefor storage allocation for vm?
dear list, whats de best practice giving store to vm? you can make plans for every server, but some have much free space, some vm''s need storage. is there a way to easy change disk capacity? storage for xen-server side: a) fc shared storage for a hand of servers. images sored on centrally storage. b) local lvm and the posibility do add local disks for the vm''s wich variant do