search for: dissociated

I am attempting to use drag and drop to reorder elements then submit the form to store the changes. Each element (<li>) has text and a nested hidden input element. The problem I am experiencing is that when the form is submitted any of the elements that have been moved are not submitted. Inspecting the DOM shows that the inputs are still nested with the elements. But for some reason

Hi, This is the fifth version of this patch series. With the Versatile Express TC2, it''s possible to boot only with A7 or A15. If the user choose to boot with only A7, the CPU ID will start at 0x100. As Xen relies on it to set the logical ID and the GIC, it won''t be possible to use Xen with this use case. This patch series is divided in 3 parts: - Patch 1: prepare Xen

When attempting to execute the mcollective puppet plugin: # mco puppet runonce -v aixl : execution expired aixj : execution expired I get an error, ''execution expired'' on some hosts. However, these hosts respond via mco ping and, I have verified the date/time on the servers. The puppet agent is also

...@user = session[:user] in my controllers and then access the various @user associations such as @user.posts. In 1.0, the session data would remained unchanged unless I explicitlt made change to a @user property, but in Edge, every association I reference is copied into the session and becomes dissociated from the database. For example, @user.posts.delete(post) only removes the post from the session. If i delete it from teh database directly, I have to reload the user object. Are there any new session options that I can change to prevent rails from copying associations to the session in the firs...

Folks, I'm trying to rationalize about optimization levels and maybe we should come up with a document like this: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html Though, I remember a discussion a few months ago, and some people recommended we had names, rather than numbers, to dissociate the idea that 3 is better than 2. Regardless, would be good to have some guidelines on what goes

Dear R users, I would like to edit my graphics in Illustrator. I know that I can set up almost every graph parameter in R, but the time I will spend searching for the correct settings might not be worth since I'm quite used to Illustrator and since I will in any case use Illustrator to prepare for publication. Up to now, I've used savePlot() with type=("eps") but I'm

Hello everyone, I tried integrating opus middleware on an STM32L4 microcontroller based project. First thing I noticed is the considerable amount of memory allocated by the opus_encoder_create function (nearly 40 kbytes if I recall). After modifying my project's memory setting (mainly heap size adjustments), I could bypass some aspects of this problems. What I'm noticing now is the time

Hi Karl, > While I think most of this is fine, I think in the fserve part (where > the checks to see if there is a playlist file in webroot), they all > seem to follow the same pattern so that would tend to indicate a > function to reduce duplication. > > At the moment I'm wondering whether these responses could be > automatically generated from xslt files? like xspf is.

...here's a way to model this more closely in the LLVM IR? (You could just specify that the llvm.eh.exception call has to be at the start of a landing pad, but I think that is too prone to being broken by optimisation passes.) To illustrate why I don't like having the llvm.eh.exception() call dissociated from the landing pads, what is the *exact* definition of llvm.eh.exception: - Does there have to be a one-to-one correspondence between convokes and llvm.eh.exception calls? - Does llvm.eh.exception have to be dominated by landing pads? - Does it just return the exception pointer from the *most re...

Chris Lattner wrote: > >> The issue I'm facing is object inheritance and how to find from a LLVM >> type what types it inherits. Currently this can't be implemented in LLVM >> and I need to implement a higher representation for types. >> > > Yep. Sorry :(. "Sorry", like "this can really not be integrated in LLVM" or like

My understanding is that if I "zfs set checksum=<different>" to change the algorithm that this will change the checksum algorithm for all FUTURE data blocks written, but does not in any way change the checksum for previously written data blocks. I need to corroborate this understanding. Could someone please point me to a document that states this? I have searched and searched

On 2016.02.26 15:32, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > Regarding the "+1", when talking about the math (not the computer code > to achieve a result as accurate as it can be) Well, sorry, but I will not dissociate the context of application from the formula itself. I thought this was implied into what I wrote, which was in the context of fixing a computation algorithm bug. The sole

mejino at u.washington.edu wrote: > > >>> A canonical human body will have canonical parts and those canonical >>> parts will >>> have canonical subparts and so on. >> >> ... and? >> >>> Can't think of anyone who would fit that >>> description. >> >> is this considered an argument for that there cannot possibly an

Infomaniak Network SA / Guy Baconniere wrote: > Hi Karl, > >> While I think most of this is fine, I think in the fserve part (where >> the checks to see if there is a playlist file in webroot), they all >> seem to follow the same pattern so that would tend to indicate a >> function to reduce duplication. >> >> At the moment I'm wondering whether these

Compile issues on an older BSD/OS 4.2 system: src/lib/byteorder.h needs #include <netinet/in.h> to pick up in_addr struct src/lib/byteorder.c no "libgen" here (no basename()). Added it inline, no big deal, but you might want to have configure test for this and provide one if it's missing. Also, on this system there are no types like "uint8_t" and

I've a script which calls: rsync --password-file=password.txt rsync://server/files /files However, due to an unrelated error password.txt was missing. In authenticate.c:auth_client, the code tries to read from the password file, then tries the RSYNC_PASSWORD env var, then calls getpass(3). This last step is causing problems as, even though the script is intended to run unattended, it

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > In its implementation of types, LLVM only has one instance of a given > shape, mostly for type equality > Is this a non-issue for LLVM? Are types just considered as layouts? LLVM uses a structural type system, which is different than many source languages. This is useful for the optimizer, but is not so useful if you want source level

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: >> Yep. Sorry :(. > > "Sorry", like "this can really not be integrated in LLVM" or like "it is > possible but it requires a lot of work to integrate it"? :) it is not a desired feature for the LLVM type system itself. >> Depending on your application, you could read debug info, >> > >

Hello everyone, I am looking at the joint spatial distribution of 2 kinds of organisms (estimated on a grid of points) and want to test for significant association or dissociation. My first question is: do you know a nice technique to do that, considering that I have a limited number of points (36) but that they are repeated (4 times)? I did GLMs to test for correlations between the

Hi all, In its implementation of types, LLVM only has one instance of a given shape, mostly for type equality (and I suppose projects like pool allocation requires it). However, this leads to a somehow misleading bytecode representation. For example, consider the C++ program compiled with llvm-g++: class AAA { int b; }; class FFF { int a; }; extern int foo(AAA * aaa); extern int