search for: disscussed

Xcuse me for stupid questions... but why almost all of U are usiing samba+ldap+kerberos, is it better than default authentication method? And could anyone assist me in tunning this mad thing up? I don't ever now what they (LDAP and Krb) are used for. Maybe U would be so kind to give me some advices considering this topic or some url's where i can find same topics disscussions. Thanks for

Hi folks, this summer I will work with Richard Smith on clang devirtualization. Check out our proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f2SGa4TIPuBGm6y6YO768GrQsA8awNfGEJSBFukLhYA/edit?usp=sharing And modified LangRef http://reviews.llvm.org/D11399 You can also check out previous disscussion that was started before our proposal was ready -

Anyone using Asterisk in a Call Center environment? And more importantly is anyone supporting home based remote call center agents with an Asterisk backend? My experience with Asterisk is limited, however I have set it up and installed it previously and had it working for home usage and for simply playing around. My background however is with Cisco CallManager, Cisco IPCCX for call centers as

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:25 PM Michael Spencer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:38 PM via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone. My name is DeForest Richards. I’m the technical writer who was selected to work on the LLVM project as part of the Google Season of Docs program. I’ll be helping to

Hi Piotr, You may be interested in a recent patch I posted: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11043 This patch addresses a de-virtualization case that I’m not sure would be handled by your current proposal, namely that of a virtual call where the ‘this’ object is a global variable. For example: struct A { A(); virtual void foo(); }; void g(A * a) { a->foo(); } A a; int main()

Hi Piotr, Thanks for posting this! First, a question. When you say, regarding i8* @llvm.invariant.group.barrier(i8*): "Required to handle destructors, placement new and std::launder. Call of this function will be put on the end of each of this functions" I completely understand placement new and std::launder. I don't understand destructors, could you explain? Also, am I correct

HI, Yep, our proposal doesn't cover it, because this load ; icmp ; assume; will land global initilizer function, and main will not see it. At least if foo would be called multiple times, then we would only have one load from vtable, but unfortunatelly we will not be able to inline, or make direct call to it with this approach. I think that this case is rare enough to solve it right now. Piotr

Hi, I mentioned this in my email last week, but I wanted to start a new thread to get everyone's input on what to do about the git-llvm script after the GitHub migration. The original plan was to require the use of the git-llvm script when committing to GitHub even after the migration was complete. The reason we decided to do this was so that we could prevent developers from accidentally

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Piotr, > > Thanks for posting this! First, a question. When you say, regarding i8* > @llvm.invariant.group.barrier(i8*): > > "Required to handle destructors, placement new and std::launder. Call of > this function will be put on the end of each of this functions" > > I

Hello, I''m using the below dtrace script to capture the flow and times of kernel functions, from an ioctl() call. After an entry into restorectx(), the trace of startimestamp - vtimestamp makes a dramatic jump downwards. Here''s the snippet showing the jump... 6 -> di_checkmem 8 220176600 6 <- di_checkmem

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:18 PM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 08:44, Whisperity via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. > > This is a big uphill fight that is rarelly worthy. Not to mention > privacy guarantees and terms and conditions

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Piotr Padlewski <prazek at google.com> wrote: > HI, > Yep, our proposal doesn't cover it, because this load ; icmp ; assume; > will land global initilizer function, and main will not see it. > At least if foo would be called multiple times, then we would only have > one load from vtable, but unfortunatelly we will not be able to inline,

On Apr 3, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Russell Wallace wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> No, please don't. This is something we specifically do not want to support. The issue is not the parser, the issue is that struct field offsets are no longer constant in this model. > > What about declaring that pointers are always 64

Greeting to all, I am trying to understand the concepts/theory/code of Vorbis Encoder, but I am finding it difficult to get many a things. I have gone through the specs and understood the modules in Vorbis, but I am not able to find any reference docs besides those available at xiph. Can someone point me to some docs or disscussion threads in this regard. As I am going through the code, please

Hello Can someone explane to me how the TCQ_F_THROTTLED flag and the watchdog function used in tbf and htb works? To be more specific, (reading tbf code) if there are not enough tokens, a watchdog timer will be "started" and the TCQ_F_THROTTLED flag set. But what happens then the time is up? where is the code reentered? What does the flag "really" mean? If someone could

I am experiencing a problem with scroll when dragging items to my drop area. I tried using the scroll option, looked through other forum disscussions but I have not been able to find a solution. I have a side by side layout where i drag elements from myTable into dropZone. The workArea div has overflow: scroll enabled. My problem is when the list becomes long and I have to scroll down to get to a

Hi Mark, Well, so do you think that any of this libraries probably won't provide correct audio conversion? Do you know any other possible solutions for described problems, ommiting trying to fix on my own any of this libraries or waiting for fix? Will you mind if I quote you in disscussion I mentioned? Sorry for asking you so many questions at once. Regards, Mateusz 2015-07-08 17:42

Hello richard, Experts , Sorry for my offtopic post, During our maillinglist disscussions in the emac-list i thought of making an announcement. Long times ago, there was a smart video chat tool, called CuSeeMe. I am tied a little bit on the tool. Nowadays with the all this Streaming Servers the time for video chat tools is coming back with power. So, I thought, it would be a smart idea

The volume/traffic on this list has been getting pretty heavy. I find it hard to follow certain discussions and there are some that I am not interested in. Perhaps, we could split the list into two: One for discussing hardware (client phones and cards) and one for the software (configuration, problems, etc...) Or some other better scheme that someone can propose.

Hi, In our project we use janus-gateway (http://janus.conf.meetecho.com/) as a webRTC gateway and also as a stream recorder. We are on the tests stage of our project, and after very long development time we have ecountered a bug that is a blocker for whole project. After real tests of recording streams using janus we realized that audio and video are out of sync in recordings, despite of fact,