search for: disproved

I run a decent amount of 3ware hardware, all under centos-4. There seems to be some sort of fundamental disagreement between ext3 and 3ware's hardware RAID5 mode that trashes write performance. As a representative example, one current setup is 2 9550SX-12 boards in hardware RAID5 mode (256KB stripe size) with a software RAID0 stripe on top (also 256KB chunks). bonnie++ results look

Could anyone please explain how to set up contrasts between means in R. I want to know if "before I conduct an experiment and believe the mean for 1 and 2 will be different from means 3 and 4, Is this true?" That is what I have to prove or disprove, I thought that contrasts would be the way to go. Thanks for the help. Igor [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I was doing an experiment to disprove some theory therefore performing lot of random simulation. Goal is to show the audience that although something has very rare chance to occur but it doesn't mean that event would be impossible. In this case after getting that rare event I need to show that same scenario for multiple times to explain other audience. Hence I need to somehow

Hi Sanjoy, Reading through LoopDependenceAnalysis::analyseStrongSIV(), I noticed one problem and one confusion. My confusion related to your naming of the two instructions as A and B. It's consistent all through LoopDependenceAnalysis. I'd prefer something like source and destination, so I can keep track of which is which. It didn't matter so much when you were simply proving or

Wojtek, If you like, I can help guide this SoC project. I would also like to see if we can coordinate with Alex and Albert, who are doing the class project here. As a first comment, your 3 layers are a good organization but two comments: 1. Layer 1 shd also look at loop bounds and array bounds: those can be used to disprove some deps. 2. The interface will also need to compute direction and

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:10 -0400, Justin Foreman wrote: > Okay. The master build worked on the join. Excellent. So it was 4.8.0 having a problem. > > I’ve attempted to join 2008 R2 now to 4.8.0 but it still blue screens. Should I start a new thread for clarity’s sake? So, I think this, the upgrade issues and even the old servicePrincipalName handling bug is all the same thing. What

Hello: I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached. I will be reading and writing many files for professor's research projects. Each file can be anywhere from 1k to 120GB (fluid dynamic research images). The 10 servers will be using NIC bonding (1GB/network). So, would GFS be ideal for this? I have been reading a lot

...up with a crossover cable between them for a straight, dedicated 1Gb/s But it certainly looks like rsync is not using more than a fraction of the (theoretically) available 100Mb/s There are several other hosts attached to the NetGear switch, and there is no "slowness" about them (which disproved my initial hypothesis of a saturated backplane) Is this a known rsync and/or Cygwin issue? I also get a "cannot send long-named file" message that halted rsync The file in question is probably a fluke, but this could happen again. How could I get rsync to just ignore the too-long filena...

Hi folks, For the past month I’ve been working on improving the DominatorTree and PostDominatorTree in LLVM. The RFC that explains the motivations and plans can be found here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114045.html . Here’s a short summary of what changed upstream since posting it: - We switched from the Simple Lengauer-Tarjan algorithm for computing dominators

I have a coworker, who''s primary expertise is in another flavor of Unix. This coworker lists floating point operations as one of ZFS detriments. I''s not really sure what he means specifically, or where he got this reference from. In an effort to refute what I believe is an error or misunderstanding on his part, I have spent time on Yahoo, Google, the ZFS section of

Is there a sensible way for me to manually remove the duplicate SPNs in the mean time? Justin > On Mar 17, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 07:34 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical > wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:10 -0400, Justin Foreman wrote: >>> Okay. The master build worked on the join.

...becomes unkillable. The only resolution is to reboot the server completely. This has occurred at least once when a workstation crashed but we have not proven that this is always the case. I was rather hoping that it was a Windoze problem to do with not having SP2 installed but this has now been disproved. This is a serious problem. I have seen postings here before about disabling OPLOCKS but am reticent to do this becasue of the drop in performance which could put cracks in our arguments for using Samba in the first place. Also I thought 2.2.2 had fixes for OPLOCK bugs! Does anyone have any sug...

Valmico <valmico88 at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm currently trying to develop new LLVM Pass that will generate > simple data dependencies graph. For now I'm trying to get familiar > with DependenceAnalysis. > My general idea is to traverse each function (runOnFunction) > top to bottom Instruction by Instruction, using DA.depends( I, I2, ...) > on every Instructions

...SHA-256. So I'm out of luck here. The different formats are no longer relevant then. CRYPT-SHA512 is not anywhere near as secure as PBKDF2. But I've read and learned a lot about secure password hashing in the past 24 hours. My initial point that PBKDF2 is the state of the art has been disproved already. This order seems to be the case [1]: MD5/SHA1 << SHA2 << PBKDF2 < bcrypt < scrypt < Argon2 So I've changed my plans and try to go for Argon2 now. I found support for .NET Core [2] and Python [3]. My original question is kind of obsolete now because I also found...

To whom it may concern, I happened to run the following R code just to check the layout of the output, but found that the code doesn't work the way I thought it should work. '' > lm(rnorm(100) ~ rnorm(100)) Call: lm(formula = rnorm(100) ~ rnorm(100)) Coefficients: (Intercept) -0.07966 Warning messages: 1: In model.matrix.default(mt, mf, contrasts) : the response appeared

1. ————— Dan, The reasoning given below for how GVN operates seems odd to me, Poison is an attribute of a value, just like nsw is an attribute of an operation, So when GVN sees a pair of equal values, one of which has an extra attribute, The proper choice for representative value is the one without the attribute, Just like when GVN sees a pair of add operations, one of which has an

Hello all, I''m new to Mongrel and am very impressed with what I see so far. This thing beats FastCGI hands down, and is even simpler to use than SCGI. Great job Zed! Thanks for all the hard work. I am a bit surprised at the memory usage patterns though. I''m not sure if I''m doing something wrong (most likely I am), or if this is a problem with the app I''m

Daniel, Thanks for taking the time to respond. Regarding GVN and newGVN, I recently finished a search through the llvm-dev archives for “nsw” in the subject line, and GVN was discussed in some of those threads [1]. In particular it was claimed that there was a right choice for GVN to make given two ADD instructions, one with the “nsw” attribute and one without, the one without ‘nsw’

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13692 Bug ID: 13692 Summary: Coverity scan for rsync-3.1.3 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: mruprich at

> Which version of gcc are you using? I know that only recently has gcc > made itself compatible with the C++ name mangling standard, whatever > that is. I have no idea if MSVC++ is compatible with it. It was essentially my own mistake. After the Embedded C++ IDE crashed unexpectedly, the .lib file was no longer present in the project settings (the project had not been saved) so all