Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "discontignous".
2006 Mar 22
1
Re: Who is using the jitter buffer?
hi,
>.. And equally important; during discontignous transmission, in which
>there may be small communication pauses (of either 3 seconds or several
>minutes), it would be beneficial if the jitter buffer remembered it's
>current estimates instead of resetting to the default.
just my two cents.
even during discontinuous transmission, i am...
2006 Mar 20
0
Who is using the jitter buffer?
...bably benefit from knowing that
packets always come in pairs.
Also, it would be beneficial if a "minimum safety" could be set, below
which the jitter buffer would not adapt (ie: always maintain at least 40ms
of buffer). Some users have requested this.
.. And equally important; during discontignous transmission, in which
there may be small communication pauses (of either 3 seconds or several
minutes), it would be beneficial if the jitter buffer remembered it's
current estimates instead of resetting to the default.
But I must say that it really does work well at the moment, at least fr...
2006 Mar 19
3
Who is using the jitter buffer?
Hi,
I'd like know about anyone using the current jitter buffer in Speex. I'm
planning on changing it to make it more general and I'd like some
feedback about how to make it better. Also, let me know if you're doing
anything serious with it and want to make sure I don't break your stuff.
Basically, I want to make the jitter buffer easier to use with other
codecs and reduce the