search for: discont

Hello, I recently added discontinuous stream support to libogg1. The patch is attached. I also wrote Writ codec for libogg1 (based on original code by Arc), and sample Writ encoder (SubRip to Writ converter) and decoder. Is anybody interested? WBR, Roman. -------------- next part -------------- Index: include/ogg/ogg.h =======...

...ould join it now at http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev In order to further facilitate everyone's ability to be informed I'm laying out an outline of which changes are actually being made: I. Debated API elements: A. To my last knowledge there was *STILL* a debate going on re discont. codecs, even though these have been published by Monty months ago. A part of this debate the following API additions have been debated: within ogg2_packet struct: ogg_int64_t top_granule; ogg_int64_t end_granule; vs ogg_int64_t granulepos; This, Mo...

...ould join it now at http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev In order to further facilitate everyone's ability to be informed I'm laying out an outline of which changes are actually being made: I. Debated API elements: A. To my last knowledge there was *STILL* a debate going on re discont. codecs, even though these have been published by Monty months ago. A part of this debate the following API additions have been debated: within ogg2_packet struct: ogg_int64_t top_granule; ogg_int64_t end_granule; vs ogg_int64_t granulepos; This, Mo...

...ould join it now at http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev In order to further facilitate everyone's ability to be informed I'm laying out an outline of which changes are actually being made: I. Debated API elements: A. To my last knowledge there was *STILL* a debate going on re discont. codecs, even though these have been published by Monty months ago. A part of this debate the following API additions have been debated: within ogg2_packet struct: ogg_int64_t top_granule; ogg_int64_t end_granule; vs ogg_int64_t granulepos; This, Mo...

...ould join it now at http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev In order to further facilitate everyone's ability to be informed I'm laying out an outline of which changes are actually being made: I. Debated API elements: A. To my last knowledge there was *STILL* a debate going on re discont. codecs, even though these have been published by Monty months ago. A part of this debate the following API additions have been debated: within ogg2_packet struct: ogg_int64_t top_granule; ogg_int64_t end_granule; vs ogg_int64_t granulepos; This, Mo...

...ould join it now at http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev In order to further facilitate everyone's ability to be informed I'm laying out an outline of which changes are actually being made: I. Debated API elements: A. To my last knowledge there was *STILL* a debate going on re discont. codecs, even though these have been published by Monty months ago. A part of this debate the following API additions have been debated: within ogg2_packet struct: ogg_int64_t top_granule; ogg_int64_t end_granule; vs ogg_int64_t granulepos; This, Mo...

...ine] doSeek(): [Event] type: SEEK, format: 5, position: 52730 [INFO] Element: [pipeline] doSendEvent(): [Event] type: SEEK, format: 5, position: 52730 to Pad: httpsrc:src [INFO] [BUFFER] sink -> doSeek() waiting for permissionToSeek If i do a wait for 5 seconds to get around this issue, i get discontinue messages in the console, and i don't know why: [INFO] theora: got discont [INFO] theora: got discont [INFO] theora: got discont So my first question is: Is my whole thinking right with providing full pages to the demuxer? Is that the right way for seeking in a Theora video stream? Why d...

Yes, I know. It's just when I see "happy", "Apple" and "iPhone SDK" on an Apple employee's mouth here, I felt a strong urge on the spur of moment to express my discontent towards Apple people who think they should make us buy their iMac just to be able to code freeware applications on iPhone. I've been waiting for so long time until an official SDK is released and finally you get : "no, guy ! you cannot ! you must be an Apple geek !". @Mike Stu...

...reasoning could have been solid for a new back-end, but not for destroying fresh code. The removal was weeks after Adhemerval had LLD bootstrapping Clang on AArch64 upstream. There were backlashes to that decision, as well as other decisions in this list, and many people have already demonstrated discontent with how LLD patches and decisions are handled. During EuroLLVM's LLD presentation, a lot of people asked technical questions about the implementation of wanted features like library order, linker scripts, version scripts, and all answers were "it's not that hard, it's all in m...

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Thiago, > > The coding standards (which have been finalized and comitted) don't dictate names for local variables. > Do you like the fact that local variables start with capital letter? Following the same convention used to name classes? It's a very strange adoption. I like the way that

On Dec 4, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Thiago Farina wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> Thiago, >> >> The coding standards (which have been finalized and comitted) don't dictate names for local variables. >> > > Do you like the fact that local variables start with capital letter? > Following the same

Hi all, I can see huge traffic here over 400 post in 4 days. My proposal is to create asterisk newsgrup proposal or phpBB forum what do think about it ? BR, Corvin btw. I'm admin of phpBB Forum (slackware forum - polish language), nearly 900 users. I think if someone will prepare it good it can be great project. (but I have 7 person team).

I'm UNhappy to see the iPhone SDK REQUIRES an expensive iMac computer to be able freely to develop programs on iPhone/iPod Touch. On 08/03/2008 00:59:55, Chris Lattner (clattner at apple.com) wrote: > I'm happy to announce that the iPhone SDK beta (released yesterday, > available on http://developer.apple.com) includes a beta version of > llvm-gcc 4.2 as part of the included

Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10), so I have to wonder. I didn't see anything jump out at me on the Red Hat site, so - anyone? Thanks. mhr

. Monday, July 5, 2004 15:50:06 (-08:00hrs UTC) Hello asterisk-users, From the following post: On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Joe Baptista wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote: >> i did not criticize the protocol. remember, my question started >> with >> >> >> i am looking at iax to

This (CentOS5.1) box is my new imap server. Using system-config-security-level I opened port 143 tcp, and mail is readable throughout the LAN. I want a Roaming account on my laptop so that I can read mail while away from home. I have set up the account in kmail, and I know that that part is correct, as it worked on my old, less-secured, imap server. However, I haven't been able so far

That is one of the reasons I do not bother since long with public CAs but rather deploy my own, including own OSCP responder. Which has of course has some drawbacks like redundancy, resilience, bandwidth provision, geographical spread, implementing CA security standards and CA trust in clients. Latter though could be easily overcome if browser and email clients were to support DNSSEC/DANE

Heylas, So, okay, I've had this lovely IMAP server running, and adore the ease of configuration, among other things. Problem, though. I'm trying to set up SquirrelMail, so that some folks with accounts on my box can use it without having to set up a proper imap client (or can check mail when they're at a cafe, or like that). However, I *won't* turn off the

...ght because I count on the people here to demonstrate my error if I am wrong. But the more I look at the architecture, the more I feel like I've dropped through a time-warp back to 1997, or even 1987. TROUBLING QUESTIONS: Let's start with a simple question that strikes at the root of my discontent: 1. In an era when file systems are normally journaled and hardened so they recover clean from power failures, what point is there in having your UPS initiate a controlled shutdown N seconds beforehand? I sure don't see enough of one to justify a multi-layer architecture involving three...

I was somewhat concerned reading Mark's posting earlier today. Obviously, things are very bad in the US at the moment. Their Government even deported Cat Stevens the other day (check http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3686992.stm ). Clearly, given the fact that Digium contributes so much to Asterisk, they shouldn't be forced to risk their company's future by hosting these