Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1007 matches for "disappointments".
Did you mean:
disappointment
2004 Jun 28
1
Disappointed
Well, I have to confess that I am disappointed that in a fairly high volume
list like this, I haven't had one reply to the questions I've asked.
(I know I haven't got any right to expect a reply, but communities are usually
fairly helpful).
It might be really obvious to you guys, but if you have not a lot of
experience with ISDN/PBXs, it's hard to understand.
I'm going to
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: disappointed with group
<rant>
I concur with "MR I" in his "disappointed" post. I've rarely
gotten help from this list, although I've had productive email
conversations with individuals. For example, I posted twice about
the fact that the "list archive search" function was broken for this list
at xiph.org, and was totally ignored. I emailed individuals at
xiph.org, and
2011 Jul 02
5
%dopar% parallel processing experiment
dear R experts---
I am experimenting with multicore processing, so far with pretty
disappointing results. Here is my simple example:
A <- 100000
randvalues <- abs(rnorm(A))
minfn <- function( x, i ) { log(abs(x))+x^3+i/A+randvalues[i] } ?## an
arbitrary function
ARGV <- commandArgs(trailingOnly=TRUE)
if (ARGV[1] == "do-onecore") {
?library(foreach)
?discard <-
2004 Jun 17
3
disappointed with x-axes in hist and density plots
I've got a few issues with the x-axes in the histogram and density plots. First,
often the default x-axis doesn't even extend to the length of my data. R often draws
histogram bars (or density lines) farther than the drawn x-axis extends. For example,
I might have a histogram bar at -15,000. But I wouldn't know that, because the most
negative number on the x-axis is -10,000. The
2003 Nov 21
5
Disappointing IMPORT Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative
2003 Nov 21
5
Disappointing IMPORT Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative
2004 Aug 06
0
disappointed with group
MR I wrote:
> must say I have found the help in this group very disapointing. Have
I don't understand why people keep complaining about this list. It's not
that anyone has the right to get personal assistance by the developers
(note: I am no developer). It's also better for all of us when the
developers don't have to waste their time on this list for minor/simple
things, imo.
2004 Aug 06
0
disappointed with group
Hi:
1. Icecast 1.x is no longer being developed excepting for security patches
and bug-fixes. Acordingly, it's probably also fair to say that it's not
really being supported, since basically, the developers have other fish to
fry. There is, of course, a decent sized user base, which I'm guessing
would make up the majority of this list.
2. Shout has not been supported for some
2003 Nov 13
0
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS onLinux
>and tpmC is read intensive.
I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive
2003 Nov 13
0
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS onLinux
>and tpmC is read intensive.
I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive
2009 Mar 11
4
starcraft disappointment.
I've tried everything i can think of and looked and tried a ton of hints on the page for it.
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=149
Under "Starcraft is soooooo sloowwwwww (that's me)"
Posted up my log and everything. I tried updates, wine updates, registry changes, switched from opengl to the default, back and forth. There are times starcraft
2003 Nov 13
2
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
Wim,
Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very
impressive, and tpmC is read intensive.
I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO
vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are
referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the
lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure.
The database is
2003 Nov 13
2
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
Wim,
Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very
impressive, and tpmC is read intensive.
I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO
vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are
referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the
lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure.
The database is
2011 Sep 07
7
new ssd to play with
I grabbed a new SSD M4-CT064M4SSD2 from Crucial.
I am disappointed. I stuck the unit in an Atom machine (zotac) with
CentOS 6 on the disk.
It really doesn't "feel" faster than the previous 5400 RPM drive that
was in it.
The SSD is giving me (in the zotac running centos 6):
hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 298 MB in 3.00 seconds = 99.30 MB/sec
The
2006 Jul 21
8
Ruby on Rails Impossible Windows
Hello,
Ruby on Rails still, as I think, very poor with MS Windows. I make the
comparison as a PHP user.
In some minutes, I have got Apache running PHP easily. In Ruby On Rails,
there is no such breeze. I expect in the future, Ruby on Rails is going
to offer something like php4apache.dll to make life easier.
As I think, There are three things made PHP popular:
1st, The ease of installation
2nd,
2005 Aug 03
2
The Next Guide Will Be...
The Next Guide Will Be...
August 3rd, 2005
The next guide on Sambadmin will about creating a great LDAP
infrastructure. I have been disappointed that I have only
received two comments about what the next guide should be,
especially since the site has had over 500 visitors in the
past two days.
I came to this decision after reading my posts. I stated that
the core motivation behind all of this is
2006 Apr 13
13
Digium cards, so disappointing !
I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P,
I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we
bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility
issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo
cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and
guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought
2019 Jul 24
6
[RFC] A new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic
Hi all,
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 16:14, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Mmmh, looks like Tim Northover is actively working on typeless/opaque
> pointers, e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D64203
Yep, I'm spending as much time as I can on the project. I think
there's not really much chance that it'll be required in this cycle
(i.e. when we fork
2011 Dec 16
2
Disappointed
I have subscribed to this list for about a month now.
I am just a MarkDown user; new to it. Using it within *Ema Personal Wiki &
Epistle* for Android.
I am not trying to implement this cool little light language into an app I
am developing; maybe someday.
I signed up because I thought I might get some MarkDown use tips.
*I have learned nothing from this list.*
I have witnessed a lot of
2005 Feb 22
4
Sound of breathing
while using iax and a soft phone, the sound of breathing comes through
so clearly that it has started bothering me. Earlier I was amazed at
the quality, but now feel it is irritating. Wondering if there is a
way to cut it down. I am in the process of exploring using iax for a
call center, but this sound of breathing is a disappointment.
Thanks
Hari