search for: disappointing

Well, I have to confess that I am disappointed that in a fairly high volume list like this, I haven't had one reply to the questions I've asked. (I know I haven't got any right to expect a reply, but communities are usually fairly helpful). It might be really obvious to you guys, but if you have not a lot of experience with ISDN/PBXs, it's hard to understand. I'm going to

<rant> I concur with "MR I" in his "disappointed" post. I've rarely gotten help from this list, although I've had productive email conversations with individuals. For example, I posted twice about the fact that the "list archive search" function was broken for this list at xiph.org, and was totally ignored. I emailed individuals at xiph.org, and

dear R experts--- I am experimenting with multicore processing, so far with pretty disappointing results. Here is my simple example: A <- 100000 randvalues <- abs(rnorm(A)) minfn <- function( x, i ) { log(abs(x))+x^3+i/A+randvalues[i] } ?## an arbitrary function ARGV <- commandArgs(trailingOnly=TRUE) if (ARGV[1] == "do-onecore") { ?library(foreach) ?discard <-...

I've got a few issues with the x-axes in the histogram and density plots. First, often the default x-axis doesn't even extend to the length of my data. R often draws histogram bars (or density lines) farther than the drawn x-axis extends. For example, I might have a histogram bar at -15,000. But I wouldn't know that, because the most negative number on the x-axis is -10,000. The

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

MR I wrote: > must say I have found the help in this group very disapointing. Have I don't understand why people keep complaining about this list. It's not that anyone has the right to get personal assistance by the developers (note: I am no developer). It's also better for all of us when the developers don't have to waste their time on this list for minor/simple things, imo.

Hi: 1. Icecast 1.x is no longer being developed excepting for security patches and bug-fixes. Acordingly, it's probably also fair to say that it's not really being supported, since basically, the developers have other fish to fry. There is, of course, a decent sized user base, which I'm guessing would make up the majority of this list. 2. Shout has not been supported for some

>and tpmC is read intensive. I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive

>and tpmC is read intensive. I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive

I've tried everything i can think of and looked and tried a ton of hints on the page for it. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=149 Under "Starcraft is soooooo sloowwwwww (that's me)" Posted up my log and everything. I tried updates, wine updates, registry changes, switched from opengl to the default, back and forth. There are times starcraft

...shmfs to go to a very large SGA. I will post the results of my tuning efforts. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 12 November 2003 17:40 To: Kevin Miller Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux yes there is a very easy explanation fro this you do selects so read only every access t a local filesystem goes through the linxu buffercache (same with solaris) so if you have enough memory or you hav a small database and plenty of free ram, all that...

...shmfs to go to a very large SGA. I will post the results of my tuning efforts. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: 12 November 2003 17:40 To: Kevin Miller Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux yes there is a very easy explanation fro this you do selects so read only every access t a local filesystem goes through the linxu buffercache (same with solaris) so if you have enough memory or you hav a small database and plenty of free ram, all that...

I grabbed a new SSD M4-CT064M4SSD2 from Crucial. I am disappointed. I stuck the unit in an Atom machine (zotac) with CentOS 6 on the disk. It really doesn't "feel" faster than the previous 5400 RPM drive that was in it. The SSD is giving me (in the zotac running centos 6): hdparm -t /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 298 MB in 3.00 seconds = 99.30 MB/sec The

Hello, Ruby on Rails still, as I think, very poor with MS Windows. I make the comparison as a PHP user. In some minutes, I have got Apache running PHP easily. In Ruby On Rails, there is no such breeze. I expect in the future, Ruby on Rails is going to offer something like php4apache.dll to make life easier. As I think, There are three things made PHP popular: 1st, The ease of installation 2nd,

The Next Guide Will Be... August 3rd, 2005 The next guide on Sambadmin will about creating a great LDAP infrastructure. I have been disappointed that I have only received two comments about what the next guide should be, especially since the site has had over 500 visitors in the past two days. I came to this decision after reading my posts. I stated that the core motivation behind all of this is

I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P, I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought

Hi all, On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 16:14, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Mmmh, looks like Tim Northover is actively working on typeless/opaque > pointers, e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D64203 Yep, I'm spending as much time as I can on the project. I think there's not really much chance that it'll be required in this cycle (i.e. when we fork

I have subscribed to this list for about a month now. I am just a MarkDown user; new to it. Using it within *Ema Personal Wiki & Epistle* for Android. I am not trying to implement this cool little light language into an app I am developing; maybe someday. I signed up because I thought I might get some MarkDown use tips. *I have learned nothing from this list.* I have witnessed a lot of

while using iax and a soft phone, the sound of breathing comes through so clearly that it has started bothering me. Earlier I was amazed at the quality, but now feel it is irritating. Wondering if there is a way to cut it down. I am in the process of exploring using iax for a call center, but this sound of breathing is a disappointment. Thanks Hari