Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1007 matches for "disappoint".
2004 Jun 28
1
Disappointed
Well, I have to confess that I am disappointed that in a fairly high volume
list like this, I haven't had one reply to the questions I've asked.
(I know I haven't got any right to expect a reply, but communities are usually
fairly helpful).
It might be really obvious to you guys, but if you have not a lot of
experience with IS...
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: disappointed with group
<rant>
I concur with "MR I" in his "disappointed" post. I've rarely
gotten help from this list, although I've had productive email
conversations with individuals. For example, I posted twice about
the fact that the "list archive search" function was broken for this list
at xiph.org, and was totally ignored. I emailed i...
2011 Jul 02
5
%dopar% parallel processing experiment
dear R experts---
I am experimenting with multicore processing, so far with pretty
disappointing results. Here is my simple example:
A <- 100000
randvalues <- abs(rnorm(A))
minfn <- function( x, i ) { log(abs(x))+x^3+i/A+randvalues[i] } ?## an
arbitrary function
ARGV <- commandArgs(trailingOnly=TRUE)
if (ARGV[1] == "do-onecore") {
?library(foreach)
?discard <...
2004 Jun 17
3
disappointed with x-axes in hist and density plots
I've got a few issues with the x-axes in the histogram and density plots. First,
often the default x-axis doesn't even extend to the length of my data. R often draws
histogram bars (or density lines) farther than the drawn x-axis extends. For example,
I might have a histogram bar at -15,000. But I wouldn't know that, because the most
negative number on the x-axis is -10,000. The
2003 Nov 21
5
Disappointing IMPORT Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative
2003 Nov 21
5
Disappointing IMPORT Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative
2004 Aug 06
0
disappointed with group
MR I wrote:
> must say I have found the help in this group very disapointing. Have
I don't understand why people keep complaining about this list. It's not
that anyone has the right to get personal assistance by the developers
(note: I am no developer). It's also better for all of us when the
developers don't have to waste their time on this list for minor/simple
things, imo.
2004 Aug 06
0
disappointed with group
Hi:
1. Icecast 1.x is no longer being developed excepting for security patches
and bug-fixes. Acordingly, it's probably also fair to say that it's not
really being supported, since basically, the developers have other fish to
fry. There is, of course, a decent sized user base, which I'm guessing
would make up the majority of this list.
2. Shout has not been supported for some
2003 Nov 13
0
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS onLinux
>and tpmC is read intensive.
I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive
2003 Nov 13
0
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS onLinux
>and tpmC is read intensive.
I got my benchmarks mixed up, TPC-H, of course, is read intensive
2009 Mar 11
4
starcraft disappointment.
I've tried everything i can think of and looked and tried a ton of hints on the page for it.
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=149
Under "Starcraft is soooooo sloowwwwww (that's me)"
Posted up my log and everything. I tried updates, wine updates, registry changes, switched from opengl to the default, back and forth. There are times starcraft
2003 Nov 13
2
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
...shmfs to go to a very large SGA.
I will post the results of my tuning efforts.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com]
Sent: 12 November 2003 17:40
To: Kevin Miller
Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with
OCFS on Linux
yes there is a very easy explanation fro this
you do selects
so read only
every access t a local filesystem goes through the linxu buffercache
(same with solaris)
so if you have enough memory or you hav a small database and plenty of
free ram, all t...
2003 Nov 13
2
Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with OCFS on Linux
...shmfs to go to a very large SGA.
I will post the results of my tuning efforts.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com]
Sent: 12 November 2003 17:40
To: Kevin Miller
Cc: ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com; ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Disappointing Performance Using 9i RAC with
OCFS on Linux
yes there is a very easy explanation fro this
you do selects
so read only
every access t a local filesystem goes through the linxu buffercache
(same with solaris)
so if you have enough memory or you hav a small database and plenty of
free ram, all t...
2011 Sep 07
7
new ssd to play with
I grabbed a new SSD M4-CT064M4SSD2 from Crucial.
I am disappointed. I stuck the unit in an Atom machine (zotac) with
CentOS 6 on the disk.
It really doesn't "feel" faster than the previous 5400 RPM drive that
was in it.
The SSD is giving me (in the zotac running centos 6):
hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 298 MB in 3...
2006 Jul 21
8
Ruby on Rails Impossible Windows
...n Rails is going
to offer something like php4apache.dll to make life easier.
As I think, There are three things made PHP popular:
1st, The ease of installation
2nd, The complete, detailed and perfect organized documentation
3rd, The variety of free tutorials and resources
Conclusion, Ruby on Rails disappointed me.
Best Regards,
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2005 Aug 03
2
The Next Guide Will Be...
The Next Guide Will Be...
August 3rd, 2005
The next guide on Sambadmin will about creating a great LDAP
infrastructure. I have been disappointed that I have only
received two comments about what the next guide should be,
especially since the site has had over 500 visitors in the
past two days.
I came to this decision after reading my posts. I stated that
the core motivation behind all of this is LDAP. Sure, Samba IS
great, but we can ha...
2006 Apr 13
13
Digium cards, so disappointing !
...2495 card ! Is the "fax" extension in Asterisk just there
to push us to the competing products ?
We hesitated to buy another Digium card after the problems with
TE410P, but I told myself it was nice to support Asterisk by
buying some Digium cards. Now Digium make us regret our buys and
a disappointed customer is a lost customer forever... Too sad...
2019 Jul 24
6
[RFC] A new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic
...nes that would need a
separate type parameter, but a couple of target-specific ones did.
Unless they were particularly anomalous and implementable by other
means, intrinsics will need to develop the ability to specify an
abstract "notable type" anyway.
Apart from all that, I'm pretty disappointed to see this as an
intrinsic though. GEP is such a fundamental part of addressing in LLVM
that bifurcating it into an intrinsic for either a language or an
analysis seems like we'd be papering over a language deficiency.
Cheers.
Tim.
2011 Dec 16
2
Disappointed
I have subscribed to this list for about a month now.
I am just a MarkDown user; new to it. Using it within *Ema Personal Wiki &
Epistle* for Android.
I am not trying to implement this cool little light language into an app I
am developing; maybe someday.
I signed up because I thought I might get some MarkDown use tips.
*I have learned nothing from this list.*
I have witnessed a lot of
2005 Feb 22
4
Sound of breathing
...ft phone, the sound of breathing comes through
so clearly that it has started bothering me. Earlier I was amazed at
the quality, but now feel it is irritating. Wondering if there is a
way to cut it down. I am in the process of exploring using iax for a
call center, but this sound of breathing is a disappointment.
Thanks
Hari