search for: disagrees

Dear R-list, I currently have to convert a data.frame with several factor-variables to a numeric matrix. Now the problem is, that the order of the factor-labels don't match the order I would like to use. for example, let's assume I have this factor-variable in my data-frame: x <- factor(rep(1:4, 5), labels=c("slightly disagree", "disagree", "agree",

I am working on modifying a REDCap survey. The data dictionary column for the response field has the following value. 1, Strongly disagree | 2, Disagree | 3, Agree | 4, Strongly Agree | 5, Don't Know | 6, Refuse to Answer | 7, Not Applicable I am wanting to convert this so that it looks as follows: 1, A. Strongly disagree | 2, B. Disagree | 3, C. Agree | 4, D. Strongly Agree | 5, E.

Dear R users, I am a psychology postgraduate student who is relatively new to using R. I am currently developing a psychometric scale and have run into a few problems when using R to calculate a polychoric correlation matrix for my dataset. I am trying to produce a polychoric correlation matrix for calculating ordinal reliability estimates (eg. Alpha, omega).The set consists of 439 observations

Hi, Everything compiled correctly for the ocfs2 package, but so far the modules will not load with the "well known" module symbol error. FATAL: Error inserting ocfs2 (/lib/modules/2.6.16.27-0.6-smp/kernel/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) Okay not sure what is up here, any suggestions? BTW, this is the correct module location and I

Hello, I am attempting to create a bar plot that contains a range of possible response values on the x-axis of 1 to 5 and contains barplots for the number of responses even in the event that there are 0 responses. For example, I have a data set that contains values of 2, 3, 4, and 5 but I would also like my graph to show that there are no 1's. I have attached the resulting graph. The

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:08:37PM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: > Hi Rich > > I have all the virtio modules available in the kernel but I'm getting the > same result . It doesn't appear to be using any kernel modules. I would have expected to see output such as this: supermin: internal insmod virtio.ko It seems as if you might not be setting SUPERMIN_MODULES; or maybe you

Hi All, I produced a barplot and made a horizontal legend below the graph. Because the results are from a survey, there are three levels, namely strongly disagree/disagree, neutral and strongly agree/agree. > rownames(survey)[1] "Strongly disagree/disagree" "Neutral" "Strongly agree/agree" As in the output above, there is a large space

Dear Professor Fox, Apologies for my oversight relating to the polychor command and thank you for your advice. I turned to the polychor command when trying to find an equivalent for the polychoric command found in the psych package (I am following a procedure outlined in Gadermann, Guhn & Zumbo, 2012 that uses this command rather than the polycor package) . The polychoric command is returning

...b=/usr/local/ofed/src/openib) . did a make install, depmod -a > and still get the following: > > my modprobe.conf is the following > > options lnet ip2nets="o2ib0 161.74.83.[0-255]" > > lctl network up > LNET configure error 100: Network is down > > ko2iblnd: disagrees about version of symbol ib_create_cq > ko2iblnd: Unknown symbol ib_create_cq > ko2iblnd: disagrees about version of symbol ib_dereg_mr > ko2iblnd: Unknown symbol ib_dereg_mr > ko2iblnd: disagrees about version of symbol ib_destroy_cq > ko2iblnd: Unknown symbol ib_destroy_cq > ko2i...

Hi all, I'm sure this is simple but I don't get it. I have a table mytable<-c(rep("Disagree",37),rep("Agree",64)) table(mytable) this gives me Agree Disagree 64 37 but I didn't ask for it to be in alphabetic order. How can I get it in original order? Disagree Agree 37 64 Thanks, Jeff Jeffrey. M. Miller, PhD

Hi, I've some virtual folders which seem a bit odd when they are listed. a LIST "virtual.spam." "*" * LIST (\Noselect \HasNoChildren) "." "virtual.spam." * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "virtual.spam.unchecked" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "virtual.spam.disagree" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "."

Dear all, Lets say I have the following: > x <- c("Eve: Going to try something new today...", "Adam: Hey @Eve, how are you finding R? #rstats", "Eve: @Adam, It's awesome, so much better at statistics that #Excel ever was! @Cain & @Able disagree though :(", "Adam: @Eve I'm sure they'll sort it out :)", "blahblah") > x [1]

...up: 5.1.8 zlib > supermin: cmdline: panic=1 console=ttyS0 udevtimeout=6000 no_timer_check > acpi=off printk.time=1 cgroup_disable=memory root=/dev/sdb selinux=0 > guestfs_verbose=1 TERM=xterm > supermin: mounting /sys > supermin: internal insmod crc32c.ko > [ 1.136268] crc32c: disagrees about version of symbol > crypto_unregister_shash > [ 1.138006] crc32c: Unknown symbol crypto_unregister_shash (err -22) > [ 1.139571] crc32c: disagrees about version of symbol > crypto_register_shash > [ 1.141446] crc32c: Unknown symbol crypto_register_shash (err -22) >...

##Q1. confint.glm(...) fails for an example of HSAUR data("womensrole", package = "HSAUR"); ## summary(womensrole); womensrole_glm_2 <- glm(fm2, data = womensrole,family = binomial()) ## summary(womensrole_glm_2); confint(womensrole_glm_2); ## -------Fail--------- # Waiting for profiling to be done... # Error in if (any(y < 0 | y > 1)) stop("y values must be 0

Hello: I need to create a six barplots from data that looks pretty close to what appears below. There are two grouping variables (age and gender) and three dependent variables for each grouping variables. I'm not really familiar with trellis graphics, perhaps there is something that can do what I need there, i don't know. The thing is: I *need* these to appear on one row, with some way

Hi, I have probably overlooked something obvious, but could anybody help me with following, please? Trying to make regression analysis. I have a huge dataframe with results from National Opinion Survey on Crime and Justice (www.abacon.com/fox/) with two variables G5 and N3 which are imported to R as ordered factors: > levels(noscj$G5) [1] "Strongly agree" "Agree"

I updated a C5 system to 2.6.18-406.el5 (from 404) and the kvm_intel module doesn't load anymore: # dmesg |grep kvm kvm_intel: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module anyone seeing similarities? -- LF

I am having a problem with ${DIALSTATUS} and )=CDR(disposition) disagreeing. Below is a dialplan snippet and the resulting CLI output. This is running in an 'h' extension. Noop(DIALSTATUS=${DIALSTATUS}) Noop(CDR(disposition)=${CDR(disposition)}) -- Executing [h at pbxmax-dial-simple:1] NoOp("SIP/msx_01-0000005b", "DIALSTATUS=ANSWER") in new stack

....8-24.11-smp/extra/torisa.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) Mar 22 11:28:51 linux modprobe: FATAL: Error running install command for torisa Mar 22 11:28:51 linux kernel: module torisa unsupported by SUSE/Novell, tainting kernel. Mar 22 11:28:51 linux kernel: torisa: disagrees about version of symbol zt_receive Mar 22 11:28:51 linux kernel: torisa: Unknown symbol zt_receive Mar 22 11:28:51 linux kernel: torisa: disagrees about version of symbol zt_ec_chunk Mar 22 11:28:51 linux kernel: torisa: Unknown symbol zt_ec_chunk Mar 22 11:28:51 linux kernel: torisa: disagrees a...

Hi R experts I'm trying to emigrate from SPSS to R, thou I have some problems whit getting R to distinguish between the different kind of missing. I want to distinguish between data that are missing because a respondent refused to answer and data that are missing because the question didn't apply to that respondent. In other words I wante to create data values where I control