search for: dimly

I've meant to ask the following for several years now. I understand why: > foo <- function(x, dim=dim) { dim } > foo(1) Error in foo(1) : promise already under evaluation: recursive default argument reference or earlier problems? gives an error, but why wouldn't/couldn't the following work? > foo <- function(x, dim=dim(x)) { dim } > foo(1) Error in foo(1) :

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14/11/2014, 9:06 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > > I've meant to ask the following for several years now. I understand why: > > > >> foo <- function(x, dim=dim) { dim } > >> foo(1) > > Error in foo(1) : > > promise already under evaluation:

Hi R users I try to use the lme but I can?t!!!!! My script is (some words in french, sorry!!): rm(list=ls(all=TRUE)) #Efface tous les objets en m?moire pour ?viter des erreurs library(MASS) #Chargement des Librairies library(car) library(Hmisc) library(tkWidgets) library(svDialogs) library(multtest) library(nlme) #Rep <- "C:/Documents and Settings/U3M/Bureau/steph/Scripts

Hello, the fix of PR18612 (https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18612) in r85380 (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/2653cc6203fce4c48874111c75bbccac3ac4e803) caused a change in `dim<-()`. Specifically, in the past, any `dim<-()` assignment would _always_ remove "dimnames" and "names" attributes per help("dim"): The replacement method changes

>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson >>>>> on Sun, 29 Oct 2023 10:42:19 -0700 writes: > Hello, > the fix of PR18612 > (https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18612) in > r85380 > (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/2653cc6203fce4c48874111c75bbccac3ac4e803) > caused a change in `dim<-()`. Specifically, in the past,

Hi Martin, Henrik, I actually like this change. Makes a lot of sense IMO that dim(x) <- dim(x) be a no-op, or, more generally, that foo(x) <- foo(x) be a no-op for any setter/getter combo. FWIW S4Arrays::set_dim() does that too. It also preserves the dimnames if the right value is only adding or dropping outermost (ineffective) dimensions: ??? > x <- array(1:6, dim=c(2,3,1),

Hi I have two arbitrarily dimensioned arrays, "a" and "b", with length(dim(a))==length(dim(b)). I want to form a sort of "corner-to-corner" version of abind(), or a multidimensional version of blockdiag(). In the case of matrices, the function is easy to write and if a=matrix(1,3,4) and b=matrix(2,2,2), then adiag(a,b) would return: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]

Transpose vector extracted from a matrix Hello, I am doing a recursive analysis that uses every line (vector) of a matrix in a loop. In the model, I need to transpose those vectors that are extracted from a matrix. Using simple vectors (no matrix involved) the transpose function works fine: simplevector <-matrix(1:3,3,1) tsimplevector <-t(simplevector) #transposed dim(simplevector)

Christoph -- There was just a thread on this earlier this week. You can search in the archives for the title: "refitting lm() with same x, different y". (Actually, it doesn't turn up in the R site search yet, at least for me. But if you just go to the archive of recent messages, available through CRAN, you can search on refitting and find it. The original post was from William

Hello, Perhaps I am missing something here about the function structure() (Platfrm etc. in the end? > structure(1:6, dim= 2:3) [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 1 3 5 [2,] 2 4 6 > structure(1:6, dim= 3:2) [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 2 5 [3,] 3 6 > structure(1:2, dim= 1:2) [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 2 > structure(1:2, dim= 2:1) [,1] [1,] 1 [2,]

Hi, I'm Sorry for any cross-posting. I've reviewed the archives and could not find an exact answer to my question below. I'm trying to generate very large sparse matrices (< 1% non-zero entries per row). I have a sparse matrix function below which works well until the row/col count exceeds 10,000. This is being run on a machine with 32G memory: sparse_matrix <-

Hi all, I'm not sure if this is a feature or a bug (and I did read the FAQ and the posting guide, but am still not sure). Some of my students have been complaining and I thought I just might ask: Let K be a vector of length k. If one types dim(K), you get NULL rather than [1] k. Is this logical? Here's the way I explain it (and maybe someone can provide a more accurate

Anyone who is interested in using optimal colour palettes should look at the work of Cindy Brewer: www.colorbrewer.org I have written code to use her colour schemes in R. It is included below. Perhaps someone may find this interesting enough to work into a package. Included also is a function showpalette, which was posted here a while back. I don't remember who wrote it. I have copied all

Hi, I tried to write the dim method for the list class, but R doesn't seem to dispatch to it: > dim.list = function(x) c(length(x[[1]]), length(x)) > dim(list(1)) NULL > dim.list(list(1)) [1] 1 1 What is the correct way of registering dim.list with .Primitive("dim")? Thanks, Vadim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All, I'm trying to compile the following code on clang- template <int dim> class X {}; template <class T> struct Y { static const unsigned int dim = 1 ; template <class U> X<Y<T>::dim> f(); }; template <class T> template <class U> X<Y<T>::dim> Y<T>::f() { return X<dim>(); } int main() { Y<int>().f<int>();

Dear R community, I am working with huge arrays, so I spend a lot of time computing. This is my code: for (x in 1:dim(variable)[1]){ for (y in 1:dim(variable)[2]){ for (z in 1:dim(variable)[3]){ result <- max(variable[x,y,z,]) } } } Is there a more efficient procedure to do this task? Thanks in advance! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All, I am trying to use optim() to minimize a function with a penalty function term. This is a simple model bioeconomic model of a fishery. The penalty function constrains the amount of effort (f) at 9. This works fine. The code is: ********** nfleets<-2 M<-1 M<-array(M,dim=c(nfleets)) N<-1000 cost<-c(30,30) cost<-array(cost,dim=c(nfleets)) Price<-2

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 9 Feb 2017, at 01:33, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 4.0.0-rc2 was just tagged from the branch at r294535. > > Building on FreeBSD 10 at least didn't crash this time, and lld built just fine. :) I uploaded the following: >

Hi, The following error message misspells the name of the 'dim' argument: > array(integer(0), dim=integer(0)) Error in array(integer(0), dim = integer(0)) : 'dims' cannot be of length 0 The name of the argument is 'dim' not 'dims': > args(array) function (data = NA, dim = length(data), dimnames = NULL) NULL Cheers, H. -- Herv? Pag?s

Hi, I have been dealing with some problems finding a fast way of getting to know in what dimension a specific value is located out of an array (like the 'which' function for a vector returns its position). Unable to find anything about this on the internet I wrote a function myself. Could you please comment if such a function already exists, and if not, please feel free to comment the