search for: dilettantes

Greetings, ----- Original Message ----- > Yeah, there are a lot of possibilities to my problem. But it is harder > to verify a hypothesis than coming up with one. So, do you have any > specific commands for the verification purpose? I'm not sure what you mean by "specific commands for verification process". Step 1, delete the troubled package and erase it from your

Am 17.01.2015 um 19:16 schrieb Heng Zhou: > OK, ok, let's put an end to this thread. We are all dilettantes and > further discussion would be just a waster of time, as is everywhere in > online forums. Fortunately I don't have critical tasks to run on linux. > Thank everyone for your involvement. Hope I can find the link to quit here. > Sad you think it is a waste of time. You might have...

Hi, Yes, that's what I would do. If you want LLVM and the register allocator to also know that the instruction explicitly defines the register, I would designate the register into it's own register class and have your instruction write to that class (and there will be only a single option for RA). cheers, Sam Sam Parker Research Student Electronic Systems Design Group Loughborough

Hi Dmitri, If you have such a simple intrinsic which operates on a single register, just lower the intrinsic to a target specific node which is only implemented by a single instruction. Like you were doing before and by using a chain operand. Hard code the instruction to use and define the global register and only pass the instruction the actual variable argument. Hope that helps, Sam Sam

Hi, I'm not sure. But in your lowered DAG the chain nodes are the first operands for you custom nodes, however for the other nodes the chain is the last operand. I seem to remember that during targetlowering the chain is the first operand and then it seems to switch over after ISelDAG, this confused me and may have something to do with the issue that you are seeing. I really don't

OK, ok, let's put an end to this thread. We are all dilettantes and further discussion would be just a waster of time, as is everywhere in online forums. Fortunately I don't have critical tasks to run on linux. Thank everyone for your involvement. Hope I can find the link to quit here. On 1/17/2015 1:11 PM, Scott Dowdle wrote: > Greetings, > >...

...ociated with. But exactly how this information can be used to ascribe contrasts of interest remains beyond my understanding, especially where interaction is concerned. Googling for days didn't yield the help i was looking for. Can some one point me to a detailed explanation (suitable for R dilettantes) how to specify any contrast of interest given a design matrix? For anyone really needing some diversion, i'd *really* appreciate a personal explanation using my design as an example. Warning- its not small... #load limma package to analyse affy gene expression data library(limma) targets...

X server, that is (as opposed to my ex-spouse...) Anyway, I was loving life with my rebuilt 2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0custom041130a kernel, and then ran "yum update", which gave me a grub line for 2.4.21-20.0.1EL, but the 21-20 not only won't work with the old X settings, I can't get it to set up X at all. I tried running "yum update" from a console on this kernel, but yum

Hi. OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 exhibits the following behavior on Linux 2.2.5. I believe this is a bug. Can anyone else replicate this? On any given SSH machine (let's call it 'test'), start ssh like this: ./ssh -L2526:mail.blah.com:25 -f mail.blah.com sleep 1000 (where mail.blah.com is some machine running sendmail, you have a login account, etc.) In a just world (and this works with

On December 14th, 2004 David Heinemeier Hansson sent this to the mailing list: I''m seeing a lot of new names on the list. Could we perhaps do a round of introductions? That would also be a great first post, if you haven''t had a chance to contribute yet. The basics should include your name, your organization, your country and city, and the project you''re