Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "diffult".
Did you mean:
diffcult
2020 Apr 24
2
[yaml2obj] GSoC-20: Add DWARF support to yaml2obj
...ives be a more useful abstraction
>> level? If you think about the .loc directive, there is actually some
>> prior art in assembler.
>>
>> -- adrian
>
> I also find YAML tests unwieldy but for some tests (especiall malformed)
> we may have to use them because it is diffult for an assembly directive
> to produce invalid output (invalid offset/relocation/string table/etc).
>
> An assembly syntax can be conciser than its YAML counterpart, e.g. to
> describe a section:
>
> assembly: .section .foo,"a", at progbits
> YAML: - Name: foo
&...
2020 Mar 31
3
[yaml2obj] GSoC-20: Add DWARF support to yaml2obj
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 10:55 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to all that & cc'ing a few of the usual suspects as FYI
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:36 AM Pavel Labath via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>
> For me personally, the ability to write/edit syntactically
2020 Apr 27
2
[yaml2obj] GSoC-20: Add DWARF support to yaml2obj
...mbler directives be a more useful abstraction
> level? If you think about the .loc directive, there is actually some
> prior art in assembler.
>
> -- adrian
>
>
> I also find YAML tests unwieldy but for some tests (especiall malformed)
> we may have to use them because it is diffult for an assembly directive
> to produce invalid output (invalid offset/relocation/string table/etc).
>
> An assembly syntax can be conciser than its YAML counterpart, e.g. to
> describe a section:
>
> assembly: .section .foo,"a", at progbits
> YAML: - Name: foo
>...