search for: diffe

hi, i did some tests about performance in jspeex ... uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$ java TestClient Diff1: 0 10 Diff2: 141 started. uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$ <p>{ SpeexEncoder e1=new SpeexEncoder(); e1.init(0,1,44100,1); byte[] by1=new byte[320]; long l1=System.currentTimeMillis(); long l2=System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("Diff1:

Dear useRs, I want to write a function that generates all the possible combinations of diff(). Example: If my vector has length 5, I need the diff() until lag=4 -> c(diff(my.vec), diff(my.vec, lag=2), diff(my.vec, lag=3), diff(my.vec, lag=4)) If it has length 4, I need until lag=3 -> c(diff(my.vec), diff(my.vec, lag=2), diff(my.vec, lag=3)) So, it must be until lag=(length(my.vec)-1).

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10756 Summary: rsync can't create files or dirs in subdirs (sometimes?) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

...ur input is greatly valued. The reason why > "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because > we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has > narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the > difference is between kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 and > kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21. Is the difference literally just that > one patch? Or were there more patches to nouveau or drm that might have > been the culprit? So far I haven't succeeded in finding the exact > differenc...

rkotler at mipsswbrd006-le:~/caviumllvm/build/test$ make Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -s 8192 ; \ /usr/bin/python /home/rkotler/workspace/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py -s -v . ) XPASS: LLVM :: tools/llvm-cov/llvm-cov.test (8916 of 9784) ******************** TEST

...greatly valued. The reason why >> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because >> we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has >> narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the >> difference is between kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 and >> kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21. Is the difference literally just that >> one patch? Or were there more patches to nouveau or drm that might have >> been the culprit? So far I haven't succeeded in finding the exact >&g...

I'm trying to get the Ada gcc front-end to work with LLVM. This series of patches gets things to the point where the Ada compiler builds, though it fails to build itself or the runtime. While I was there I resurrected fortran and java: as with Ada, the compilers build but not the runtimes. Also, I've replaced the gcc 4.0 Ada front-end with a back-port of the Ada front-end from FSF gcc

...The reason why >>> "we" (nouveau developers) generally ask for a git bisection is because >>> we don't know or track specific distributions. Although your search has >>> narrowed the problem down (thanks for that!), we don't know how big the >>> difference is between kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 and >>> kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21. Is the difference literally just that >>> one patch? Or were there more patches to nouveau or drm that might have >>> been the culprit? So far I haven't succeeded in finding the...

Just an attempt to avoid overflows with an explicit check, I don't know if there's a better way to identify corrupt input here. James Zern (2): op_pcm_seek: fix int64 overflow op_fetch_and_process_page: fix int64 overflow src/opusfile.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.15.0.448.gf294e3d99a-goog

hello, What is the current situation with xen on amd64? the debian/sid archive keeps no linux-image-2.6.22-2-xen-amd64, and I was not able to compile a 2.6.22 dom0 kernel with debian xen patches applied on my amd64 system. I have linux-source-2.6.22 and linux-patch-debian-2.6.22 installed, and followed the instructions from the workaround for

Anyone knows hat might be the cause of this error? Thanks for any help! >library(MASS) > dif.mns = function(x2,tr1=.2,tr2=.3){ + #generates four different 'means' using + #difference scores from x2, an n x 2 matrix + #for use w/ bootstrap comparisons + diffs = apply(x2,1,diff) + mn1=mean(diffs) + mn2=mean(diffs,tr=.2) + mn3=mean(diffs,tr=.3) + mn4=median(diffs) + mns=c(mn1,mn2,mn3,mn4) + list(mnds=round(mns,3...

...IC") > summary(CPILD4UR) The results indicate that the optimal lags selected by BIC is 4. Then I run the same unit root test with drift and 4 lags: > CPILD4UR1<-ur.df(x1$CPILD4[5:nr1], type ="drift", lags =4) > summary(CPILD4UR1) Nevertheless, the results are different. Could anyone tells me why? In EViews these two are the same and the results are close to my first case. Thanks! A complete log: > CPILD4UR1<-ur.df(x1$CPILD4[5:nr1], type ="drift", lags =4) > summary(CPILD4UR1) ############################################### # Augm...

Dear List, Currently, I'm trying to implement a new feature to rsync. Delta back: Well, it simply just backups diff blocks, and the program is able to restore to any backup points. Current problem met for adding files! But I met a newbie problem here. I'm going to add six files, which are diff.h/diff.c del.h/del.c and merge.h/merge.c. I have modified Makefile.in. When I add an

hi, Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote: > uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$ java TestClient > Diff1: 0 > 10 > Diff2: 141 > started. > uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$ Sorry, i think this number (diff2) occured due to jvm startup load ... when doing repetive encoding the numbers are much closer to Marc's minimum requirements (with Diff being the elapsed time for encoding on my

--- diff/diff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/diff/diff.c b/diff/diff.c index f4b25e9..ad371b0 100644 --- a/diff/diff.c +++ b/diff/diff.c @@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ output_int64_uid (int64_t i) { next_field (); /* csv doesn't need escaping */ - if (printf ("%4" PRIi64, i) < 0) { + if (printf (csv ? "%" PRIi64 : "%4"

Dear R People: I thought all was well with my source compilation on Windows until I tried "make check" Here is an abbreviated version of my results: C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check make check -------- Testing package base -------- Running examples in 'base-Ex.R' ... Comparing `base-Ex.Rout' to `base-Ex.Rout.prev' ...diff: extra operand

Hello, I am trying to vectorize the following loop but the vectorizer says: "Found a possible write-write reorder" and does not vectorize. Why? for (j=0; j < 8; j++) { jj = j << 3; m2[j][0] = diff[jj ] + diff[jj+4]; m2[j][1] = diff[jj+1] + diff[jj+5]; m2[j][2] = diff[jj+2] + diff[jj+6]; m2[j][3] = diff[jj+3] + diff[jj+7]; m2[j][4] = diff[jj ] -

--- diff/diff.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/diff/diff.c b/diff/diff.c index 8b0fda0..6a374af 100644 --- a/diff/diff.c +++ b/diff/diff.c @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void deleted (guestfs_h *g, struct file *file) { output_start_line (); - output_string ("+"); + output_string ("-"); output_file (g, file); output_end_line ();

...to just move diff.ts() to package base, since it relies itself on lag & lag.default which are also only in package ts. ---------------------------------------------------- A simple example : > diff(ts(1:50, start= 1980, frequency = 12)) Error in tsp<-(*tmp*, value = c(xtsp[1] + lag * differences * xtsp[3], : invalid time series parameters specified > library(ts) > diff(ts(1:50, start= 1980, frequency = 12)) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1980 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1981 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1982 1...

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:22 PM, James Zern <jzern at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:07 PM, James Zern <jzern at google.com> wrote: >> Just an attempt to avoid overflows with an explicit check, I don't know if >> there's a better way to identify corrupt input here. >> >> James Zern (2): >> op_pcm_seek: fix int64 overflow