search for: dichotomy

...global environment does not contain x. Why doesn't it look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? THanking you, Yours sincerely, AKSHAY M KULKARNI [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear list, has anyone written a package/function in R for computing a point- biserial resp. biserial correlation? Thanks in advance Bernd

Le 19/02/2015 11:03, Chris Murphy a ?crit : > This is a false dichotomy. I reject it. There's too much fact to the > contrary. My mom has done an OS installation, she is most definitely > not an admin. I'd say your mom is an admin in the sense that chickens fly and horses swim. :o) -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres...

...vironment does not contain x. Why doesn't it look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). > > What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? > > THanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/...

...t CMake have > apparently not been faced with the absolute need for solid > up-time. Installing hack-me-now, buggy, bleeding-edge software > was severely discouraged. But in the LLVM environment, I can see > where that is not a strong necessity. However I think you are creating a false dichotomy. I have no real insight into Ubuntu's methodology, but as a user, what I observe is that Ubuntu LTS is NOT a collection of the most recent stable well-tested versions of all components, kept up-to-date; instead, it is a snapshot of stable, well-tested versions of all components, which Ubuntu...

...all installed libraries are listed. We have used the standard installer that comes with R0.65.1. What are we doing wrong? Jim PS It would be nice if the installer knew exactly where to put libraries within an R tree instead of having to specify the library directory. Also, the library/package dichotomy is extremely confusing for a new user. (I refuse to use the term, package, myself.) If the package terminology is to be retained, then they should be loaded with package(). -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwi...

...not contain x. Why doesn't it > look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are > thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that > happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). > > What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? > > THanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/...

...not contain x. Why doesn't it > look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are > thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that > happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). > > What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? > > THanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/...

...full matrix of possible frontend and backends. Even if you write very small tests for checking vectorization, what is next? What about unrolling, inlining, loop-fusion, etc. ? Why would we stop the end-to-end FileCheck testing to vectorization? So the monorepo vs the test-suite seems like a false dichotomy: if such tests don't make it in the monorepo it will be (I believe) because folks won't want to maintain them. Putting them "elsewhere" is fine but it does not solve the question of the maintenance of the tests. -- Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment...

...re sets of packages which the distribution creators have selected to work together; you don't compose modules as an end-user. > Are you sure that all the added complexity and implicitly giving up a > stable platform by providing a mess of package versions is worth it? This is a false dichotomy. We will be providing a stable platform as the Base Runtime module. > How are the plans about dealing with bug reports, say, for squid 2.7, > for those who need that version for a feature which hasn?t been > included in current versions yet? Just wait a bit until the > distribution go...

Link here http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-318208.html Will H264 become web standard in the future?

Link here http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-318208.html Will H264 become web standard in the future?

...ironment does not contain x. Why doesn't it look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). > > What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? > First, some background: Packages are associated with multiple environments. There is the internal one that the package sees, and the external one that contains just the exports. These are sometimes called the "package" environment and the "namespace" environment, b...

...d no longer give an error. -Deepayan Why doesn't it look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? THanking you, Yours sincerely, AKSHAY M KULKARNI [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org<mailto:R-help at r-project.org> mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PL...

...#39;t it > > look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are > > thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that > > happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). > > > > What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? > > > > THanking you, > > Yours sincerely, > > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, se...

Dear R-users, Is there a function in R that classifies data in more than 2 groups using logistic regression/classification? I want to compare the c-indices of earlier research (lrm, binary response variables) with new c-indices obtained from 'multiple' (more response variables) logistic regression. Best regards, Stephanie Delalieux Department Biosystems M?-BIORES Group of Geomatics

Le 19/02/2015 05:43, Chris Murphy a ?crit : > My personal view on installers is extremely biased toward the user > staying out of trouble, they shouldn't have to read documentation for > a GUI installer. A *user* never has to even see - or use - an installer. A USER has to USE a computer, by which I mean the applications he or she needs to get some work done. The person who gets

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:16 PM Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Let's not assume a dichotomy between storing a int64 in > llvm::Instruction and bitwise tricks -- they're both ways of caching > position within llvm::Instruction. I think we first need to establish > that we need such a cache in llvm::Instruction/llvm::BasicBlock at > all. > > Do you have a sense of whe...

...; > -Deepayan > > Why doesn't it look further in the environment stack, like that of packages? There are thousands of packages that contain the variable named x. Of course, that happens if the above code is in a function (or does it?). > > What concept of R is at work in this dichotomy? > > THanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org<mailto:R-help at r-project.org> mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see &...

I have two indicator variables ABS and DEFF. I want to create another indicator variable which will take value 1 if either ABS=1 or DEFF=1. Otherwise, it will take value 0. How can I make that? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]