search for: dialects

...etter to delay the submission of “translation to LLVM IR” patch in MLIR? Lowering code will become inconsistent if the OpenMPIRBuilder is used only for a few constructs and not for others. Also, the patch does OpenMP dialect lowering *alongside* LLVM Dialect to LLVM IR. This is different from most dialects which get directly lowered to LLVM Dialect. I think lowering to LLVM Dialect would be a cleaner way if OpenMPIRBuilder is not being considered for all constructs. Mehdi also seems to have the same suggestion: “I agree that having dialect lowering would be cleaner” in https://reviews.llvm.org/D7296...

...;> to LLVM IR” patch in MLIR? Lowering code will become inconsistent if the >> OpenMPIRBuilder is used only for a few constructs and not for others. >> > >> Also, the patch does OpenMP dialect lowering *alongside* LLVM Dialect to >> LLVM IR. This is different from most dialects which get directly lowered to >> LLVM Dialect. I think lowering to LLVM Dialect would be a cleaner way if >> OpenMPIRBuilder is not being considered for all constructs. >> > > > I don't disagree, but there are a lot of speculation here: your quote > starts with &qu...

.... A. For most OpenMP design discussions, FIR examples are used (as seen in (2) and (3)). The MLIR examples mentioned in the design only talks about FIR dialect and LLVM dialect. This completely ignores the likes of standard, affine (where most loop transformations are supposed to happen) and loop dialects. I think it is critical to decouple the OpenMP dialect development in MLIR from the current flang / FIR effort. It would be useful if someone can mention these examples using existing dialects in MLIR and also how the different transformations / lowerings are planned. B. In latest RFC(3), it is me...

...e >>>> inconsistent if the OpenMPIRBuilder is used only for a few constructs and >>>> not for others. >>>> >>> >>>> Also, the patch does OpenMP dialect lowering *alongside* LLVM Dialect >>>> to LLVM IR. This is different from most dialects which get directly lowered >>>> to LLVM Dialect. I think lowering to LLVM Dialect would be a cleaner way if >>>> OpenMPIRBuilder is not being considered for all constructs. >>>> >>> >>> >>> I don't disagree, but there are a lot of s...

I have a kyocera TA-205C printer that is can scan to pdf and place the file on a smb share. I have a user on my domain (PCEDOM\printers) that can login and access the share. I tested it out with smbclient and was able to create a file where the printer is supposed to be able to put the file. The printer gave a very unhelpful error message, so I did a packet capture to find the error. (see

...base language has to offer, both lexically and dynamically. > I am mostly concerned with the MLIR side of things for OpenMP representation. MLIR can not only support operations for General Purpose languages like C,C++, Fortran, etc but also various Domain Specific Language representations as dialects (Example, ML, etc.). Note that there is also SPIR V dialect which is again meant for “Parallel Compute”. It becomes important to define the scope of the dialects / operations / types supported inside OpenMP operations in MLIR. > Assuming otherwise is not going to work. Analyzing a "gene...

...t; descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to > >> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR. > > > > > > Just last week I had to scout through the affine dialect "LangRef > > <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/Dialects/Affine.md > >" > > for something, and I also felt that it is due for a refresh! It seemed a > > bit more than just BNF though, do you have example of what you would like > > to see expanded there? > > I was referring to the base MLIR documentation with the BNF com...

...doesn't lend itself to concrete semantic > descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to > have documentation on par with the LLVM IR. Just last week I had to scout through the affine dialect "LangRef <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/Dialects/Affine.md>" for something, and I also felt that it is due for a refresh! It seemed a bit more than just BNF though, do you have example of what you would like to see expanded there? And to be clear: the ambition should be that the dialects included in-tree (in MLIR/LLVM) get some level of...

Hello, I was reading about secure Dialect negotiation to prevent man-in-middle to downgrade dialects & capabilities. _https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/openspecification/2012/06/28/smb3-secure-dialect-negotiation/_ I wanted to ask, is there any option to disable SMB2 to do dialect renegotiation as present in Windows8 clients, as they can control using RequireSecureNegotiate. -- Thanks Amit K...

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > What's the use case? the use case is that we can print out the assembly using alternative dialect. currently, on Intel machine, the default dialect is AT&T, and we cannot change that to Intel syntax without using cl:opt. the new public method lets us change the dialect without having cl:opt involved.

currently, there is no (easy) way to set the AssemblerDialect. the only method i am aware of is to set that via cl:opt. this patch fixes that by adding a public function setAssemblerDialect() to class MCAsmInfo. Signed-off-by: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> diff --git a/include/llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h b/include/llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h index 97aad71..cd08a7e 100644 ---

...levels ("QF","SF") Prediction is factor, two levels ("High","Low") Reduction is covariate summary(ancova) yields: Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 0.58047 0.09865 5.884 9e-07 *** DialectSF -0.11819 0.08513 -1.388 0.173315 PredictionLow -0.49309 0.13650 -3.612 0.000896 *** Reduction -0.53488 0.15354 -3.484 0.001289 ** DialectSF:PredictionLow 0.49494 0.14627 3.384 0.001703 ** I know that the (Intercept) is the intercept for the...

Hi all How can I list of all opened connections to a share and see protocol negotiated? Ubuntu 12.04, Samba 3 & 4 Regards Daniel -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/List-open-connections-with-negotiated-dialect-tp4670389.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

(Hi, I tried sending this to ess-bugs, but got it bounced back: "user unknown". Hope this isn't too off-topic for ess-help. Scot) I'm using Xemacs 21.4, ess 5.1.24, on Windows 98 SE, with John Fox's configuration files: (http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/ESS/index.html) and am getting the end-of-loop-timeout warning message I've seen reported to

Hello Jeremy, thanks a million for your help and interest in tracking this down! :-) Am 13.06.2017 um 18:36 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > Can you get comparitive wireshark traces for the two cases ? > > That would help discover what the bottleneck is. I am not at all a network guy, but I hope that - maybe with a little more help from your part once I have tried to do so in practice - I

Dear all, During a recent package submission, we were highlighted that some lines in our configure script didn't follow the correct syntax. The lines looked like this: x=$(($y/10)) We were indicated at the time that this is because the statement does not use Bourne shell syntax, which is absolutely true, and also that the manual warns about this, which is true again. So far everything

I increased the logging to 10 on the problem member server. Didn't see anything of interest. I did a packet capture on the PDC while typing " net rpc testjoin" from both the problem member server (4.4.14) and a working member server (4.4.13) e.g SMB: ----- SMB Header ----- SMB: SMB: CLIENT REQUEST SMB: Command code = 0x72 SMB:

What's the use case? On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > currently, there is no (easy) way to set the AssemblerDialect. the > only method i am aware of is to set that via cl:opt. > > this patch fixes that by adding a public function > setAssemblerDialect() to class MCAsmInfo. > > Signed-off-by: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at

For what it's worth, Autoconf does not assume that arithmetic expansion will be available. Instead, it emits the following shell code: if ( eval 'test $(( 1 + 1 )) = 2' ) 2>/dev/null; then eval 'func_arith () { func_arith_result=$(( $* )) }' else func_arith () { func_arith_result=`expr "$@"` } fi 2017-12-17 23:55 GMT+01:00 Rodrigo Tobar

Hi, I am enhancing the Samba Server on our product (VxWorks on the box) to support Long Name. So I started implementing the dialect "LM1.2X002" (first dialects that support Long Name, the current dialect that we support is PC Network Program). I have implemented the Negotiation, Tree Connect AndX and Open AndX command. When I try access the shared drive of our product, after the Negotiation, Tree Connect AndX and Open AndX, the Windows XP machine sends...