search for: dialect

...zed that the OpenMPIRBuilder will be used for all the constructs, wouldn’t it be better to delay the submission of “translation to LLVM IR” patch in MLIR? Lowering code will become inconsistent if the OpenMPIRBuilder is used only for a few constructs and not for others. Also, the patch does OpenMP dialect lowering *alongside* LLVM Dialect to LLVM IR. This is different from most dialects which get directly lowered to LLVM Dialect. I think lowering to LLVM Dialect would be a cleaner way if OpenMPIRBuilder is not being considered for all constructs. Mehdi also seems to have the same suggestion: “I agr...

...t; points out. >> >> Given that the multiple components of the LLVM project, namely clang, >> flang, MLIR and LLVM are involved, llvm-dev is probably a better place, >> with a much wider audience >> > > Possibly wider, but maybe less focused about discussing MLIR dialect > design. In particular there is an RFC thread for this particular dialect on > Discourse, which is the canonical place to discuss its design. > > >> , until it is clear how different components must interact. >> > > They don't need to interact so closely: they are...

Hi, I have few questions / concerns regarding the design of OpenMP dialect in MLIR that is currently being implemented, mainly for the f18 compiler. Below, I summarize the current state of various efforts in clang / f18 / MLIR / LLVM regarding this. Feel free to add to the list in case I have missed something. 1. [May 2019] An OpenMPIRBuilder in LLVM was proposed for fla...

...hat the multiple components of the LLVM project, namely clang, >>>> flang, MLIR and LLVM are involved, llvm-dev is probably a better place, >>>> with a much wider audience >>>> >>> >>> Possibly wider, but maybe less focused about discussing MLIR dialect >>> design. In particular there is an RFC thread for this particular dialect on >>> Discourse, which is the canonical place to discuss its design. >>> >>> >>>> , until it is clear how different components must interact. >>>> >>> &...

I have a kyocera TA-205C printer that is can scan to pdf and place the file on a smb share. I have a user on my domain (PCEDOM\printers) that can login and access the share. I tested it out with smbclient and was able to create a file where the printer is supposed to be able to put the file. The printer gave a very unhelpful error message, so I did a packet capture to find the error. (see

...rding where the optimisations should be carried out. Could you please provide more details on this? I would like to quote Chris here: “if you ignore the engineering expense, it would clearly make sense to reimplement the mid-level LLVM optimizers on top of MLIR and replace include/llvm/IR with a dialect definition in MLIR instead.“ -- http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-January/138341.html *Rest of the comment are inlined.* On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:48 PM Johannes Doerfert <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Vinay, > > Thanks for taking an interest and the detailed disc...

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 1:54 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > Of course by its nature, MLIR doesn't lend itself to concrete semantic > >> descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to > >> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR. > > > > > > Just last week I had to scout through the affine dialect "LangRef > > <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/Dialects/Affine.md > >" > > for somethin...

...ed for > > an official specification, similar to the one for LLVM IR, as well as > > a formal document with the expected semantics into LLVM IR. Sooner, > > indeed. > > +1. There are all kinds of scattered documents on the TensorFlow site > talking about MLIR, the affine dialect, etc. but nothing of the quality > and approachability of LLVM's language reference. I find it difficult > to pull all the pieces together. > One of the main reason we haven't invested in a proper website and documentation was in anticipation of a possible integration in LLVM, so...

Hello, I was reading about secure Dialect negotiation to prevent man-in-middle to downgrade dialects & capabilities. _https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/openspecification/2012/06/28/smb3-secure-dialect-negotiation/_ I wanted to ask, is there any option to disable SMB2 to do dialect renegotiation as present in Windows8 clients, as they c...

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > What's the use case? the use case is that we can print out the assembly using alternative dialect. currently, on Intel machine, the default dialect is AT&T, and we cannot change that to Intel syntax without using cl:opt. the new public method lets us change the dialect without having cl:opt involved. thanks, Jun > On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wr...

currently, there is no (easy) way to set the AssemblerDialect. the only method i am aware of is to set that via cl:opt. this patch fixes that by adding a public function setAssemblerDialect() to class MCAsmInfo. Signed-off-by: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> diff --git a/include/llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h b/include/llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h index 97aad71..cd08...

Please help me interpret the following results. The full model (Schwa~Dialect*Prediction*Reduction) was reduced via both update() and step(). The minimal adequate model is: ancova<-lm(Schwa~Dialect+Prediction+Reduction+Dialect:Prediction) Schwa is response variable Dialect is factor, two levels ("QF","SF") Prediction is factor, two levels ("High&...

Hi all How can I list of all opened connections to a share and see protocol negotiated? Ubuntu 12.04, Samba 3 & 4 Regards Daniel -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/List-open-connections-with-negotiated-dialect-tp4670389.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...ct: ess-mode 5.1.24; end of loop timeout --text follows this line-- Emacs : XEmacs 21.4 (patch 11) "Native Windows TTY Support (Windows)" [Lucid] (i586-pc-win32) of Wed Jan 08 2003 on TSUNAMI Package: ess-mode 5.1.24 current state: ============== (setq ess-language "S" ess-dialect "R" ess-ask-for-ess-directory nil ess-ask-about-transfile nil ess-directory nil ess-keep-dump-files "always" ess-source-directory "/tmp/" ) (ess-setq-vars-LOCAL): language=SAS, dialect=SAS, buf=unlikely-name.sas, comint..echoes=nil, comint..sender=comint-simple-s...

Hello Jeremy, thanks a million for your help and interest in tracking this down! :-) Am 13.06.2017 um 18:36 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > Can you get comparitive wireshark traces for the two cases ? > > That would help discover what the bottleneck is. I am not at all a network guy, but I hope that - maybe with a little more help from your part once I have tried to do so in practice - I

...e a POSIX-compliant /bin/sh" [2]. The footnote goes even further, and links to the POSIX specification of the Shell Command Language [3] (as published by The Open Group), which explicitly includes arithmetic expressions like the one above in its syntax [4]. My question then is: what exact dialect should be considered? Given that the statement above does not work in the Bourne shell, I conclude that the Bourne shell is not POSIX-compliant. That in turn would make the manual ambiguous as to the precise dialect that should be used by our configure scripts, and either the shells used by R s...

...(TID) = 0x0000 SMB: - Process ID (PID) = 0xfffe SMB: - User ID (UID) = 0x0000 SMB: - Multiplex ID (MID) = 0x0000 SMB: - Flags summary = 0x18 SMB: - Flags2 summary = 0xc843 SMB: SMB: ByteCount = 49 SMB: Dialect String = NT LANMAN 1.0 SMB: Dialect String = NT LM 0.12 SMB: Dialect String = SMB 2.002 SMB: Dialect String = SMB 2.??? SMB: On the working member server, the packet capture included a lot of "SMB" traffic. With the problem server, all the "SM...

What's the use case? On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > currently, there is no (easy) way to set the AssemblerDialect. the > only method i am aware of is to set that via cl:opt. > > this patch fixes that by adding a public function > setAssemblerDialect() to class MCAsmInfo. > > Signed-off-by: Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> > > > diff --git a/include/llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h b/in...

.../bin/sh" [2]. The footnote goes even > further, and links to the POSIX specification of the Shell Command Language > [3] (as published by The Open Group), which explicitly includes arithmetic > expressions like the one above in its syntax [4]. > > My question then is: what exact dialect should be considered? Given that the > statement above does not work in the Bourne shell, I conclude that the > Bourne shell is not POSIX-compliant. That in turn would make the manual > ambiguous as to the precise dialect that should be used by our configure > scripts, and either the sh...

Hi, I am enhancing the Samba Server on our product (VxWorks on the box) to support Long Name. So I started implementing the dialect "LM1.2X002" (first dialects that support Long Name, the current dialect that we support is PC Network Program). I have implemented the Negotiation, Tree Connect AndX and Open AndX command. When I try access the shared drive of our product, after the Negotiation, Tree Connect AndX and O...