search for: dfsr

...#39;m trying to get a healthy domain at the 2008 R2 domain level first. So don't worry about the WS 2016 for now. Most of it already works: I can do a classicmigrate to AD, then join the WS2008 and afterwards get rid of all dcdiag errors. What I'm having problems with though is getting the DFSR replication of SYSVOL working. I am perfectly aware that Samba doesn't support FRS nor DFSR. But is it at least possible to get it working after the Samba server was demoted? Can it at least provide for the necessary LDAP objects? I tried raising the domain level while I had the Samba server a...

...sers,DC=axxxxxx,DC=local Fix replPropertyMetaData on CN=Sxxxxxx Sxxxxx,CN=Users,DC=axxxxxx,DC=local by sorting the attribute list? [YES] Fixed attribute 'replPropertyMetaData' of 'CN=Sxxxxxx Sxxxxx,CN=Users,DC=axxxxxx,DC=local' . . . CN=ADS,CN=Topology,CN=Domain System Volume,CN=DFSR-GlobalSettings,CN=System,DC=axxxxxx,DC=local: 0x00000003 CN=ADS,CN=Topology,CN=Domain System Volume,CN=DFSR-GlobalSettings,CN=System,DC=axxxxxx,DC=local: 0x00000000 ERROR: unsorted attributeID values in replPropertyMetaData on CN=ADS,CN=Topology,CN=Domain System Volume,CN=DFSR-GlobalSettings,CN=Sys...

...Microsoft DFS i have 3 options regarding the target. (Targets in a client's site are listed first in a referral. Nevertheless i can choose between: Random order, Lowest cost, Exclude targets outside of the client's site). Is it possible to achieve something similar with a samba DFS? 2. DFSR within samba is "not yet implemented." - is there any timetable for it? 3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here) In Windows this is possible with a "Workaround", the solution for that...

...rk on DCs, use a separate file server. - Joining an AD requires one of its DCs in the same subnet? - Cluster filesystems destroy TDB files, use CTDB. - CTDB does not work on an AD-DC, use a separate file server. - DFS works only server-based, not domain-based? - DFS works only for Administrators? - DFSR is not implemented. Is this list correct? Is it complete? This list should be in a Samba4-ReadmeFirst on the Wiki startpage. I once started such a page, should I update the "limitations" section and finally put a link to it on the startpage? Will the Wiki allow me to edit the startpa...

...svdcp.tls.msk.ru. A 192.168.19.6 I haven't found the string e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 anywhere in /var/lib/samba/ or similar dirs, the only single mention of it is in private/spn_update_list: # These are not supported yet: # NtFrs-88f5d2bd-b646-11d2-a6d3-00c04fc9b232/${HOSTNAME} # Dfsr-12F9A27C-BF97-4787-9364-D31B6C55EB04/${HOSTNAME} (yes, commented out). What it is doing here? It *looks* like this is being logged when the this DC (msdcm) is trying to replicate to msdcp, - but that one reports successful replication, while this one (svdcm) shows errors in replication: ==== IN...

...s >> in >> a client's site are listed first in a referral. Nevertheless i can >> choose between: Random order, Lowest cost, Exclude targets outside of >> the client's site). Is it possible to achieve something similar with a >> samba DFS? >> >> 2. DFSR within samba is "not yet implemented." - is there any >> timetable >> for it? >> >> 3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the >> servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here) >> In Windows this is possible w...

...olynx.com,CN=Microsoft System Volumes,CN=System,CN=Configuration,DC=microlynx,DC=com > Removing Sysvol reference: CN=DC3,CN=Domain System Volumes (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=microlynx,DC=com > Removing Sysvol reference: CN=DC3,CN=Topology,CN=Domain System Volume,CN=DFSR-GlobalSettings,CN=System,DC=microlynx,DC=com > Demote successful > root at dc3:~# > > but it leaves the demoted DC's DNS entries in place. So there's still something missing in the demote process. > > Thanks, > > spindles7 > > The patch has been pushed, so i...

...f idmap.ldb is different on each DC, so when you rsync sysvol from one to the other, it ends up with the wrong ownership. > >> the cure is to have the same idmap.ldb on all DCs. > The conceptual failure with sysvol is that we don't support > the AD protocol replication (FRS or DFSR) yet. Only therefore, > we need the band-aid of replicating under the hood with unix > file system level tools like rsync. I think that problems with > sysvol synchronization rather originate in this circumstance > than in the use of rsync w/o identical ids on both side. > But I may...

...000 R5: 00000001 R6: 00000001 R7: 0028fb54 (XEN) R8: 00004d24 R9: 7fffa000 R10:00000000 R11:0028fad4 R12:80000001 (XEN) HYP: SP: 0028fab4 LR: 0024718c (XEN) (XEN) HTTBR bfed2000 (XEN) HDFAR 0 (XEN) HIFAR 0 (XEN) HPFAR 0 (XEN) HCR 00002835 (XEN) HSR 94000155 (XEN) VTTBR 0000000000 (XEN) (XEN) DFSR 0 DFAR 0 (XEN) IFSR 0 IFAR 0 (XEN) (XEN) Xen stack trace from sp=0028fab4: (XEN) 0024d784 00000fff 00000000 00000001 00000001 0028fb54 40028000 0028fadc (XEN) 0026850c 0028fee4 00243404 b0000000 00000000 00020000 00000000 00000000 (XEN) 40037f58 4003f000 0025c4b4 fffffd48 00255c90 00000008...

Thanks Rowland. Have submitted a bug report (No 11818). spindles7 On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:38:02 +0100, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: >On 30/03/16 23:26, spindles7 wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am consistently getting the error: >> >> root at dc2:~# samba-tool domain demote -Uadministrator >> Using dc1.microlynx.com as partner server for the demotion

...vers,CN=Default-First-Site -Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=micore,DC=us objectGuid obtained InvocationID obtained dnsHostname obtained site info obtained All the info for the server collected * Identifying all NC cross-refs. Got error while checking if the DC is using FRS or DFSR. Error: A device attached to the system is not functioning.The VerifyReferences, FrsEvent and DfsrEvent tests might fail because of this error. * Found 3 DC(s). Testing 1 of them. Done gathering initial info. Doing initial required tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LARK...

Hey all, has anyone done dcdiag against his DC yet? It's made from a windows client on command line: dcdiag /s:<servername> What are your results? With me some of the tests were not successful, e.g. ForestDNSDomain. My dcdiag is German so its output would not be so helpful for the mailing list. So somebody else can do a check to compare? Thanks in advance Tim

This patch fixes size of ttbcr register (TCR_EL1 in case of AArch64) and it''s programming considering size in case of context switch. Currently ttbcr is defined as 32b register but for AArch64 TCR_EL1 size is 64b. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> --- xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 8

On 07/11/15 23:28, Michael Adam wrote: > rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. OK, I know that logins will work on all the samba machines, but I am not sure what you say about rsync is correct, this is what 'man rsync' has to say about '--numeric-ids': --numeric-ids don't map uid/gid values by user/group name So by my reading, if you don't use it,

...tions regarding the target. (Targets in > a client's site are listed first in a referral. Nevertheless i can > choose between: Random order, Lowest cost, Exclude targets outside of > the client's site). Is it possible to achieve something similar with a > samba DFS? > > 2. DFSR within samba is "not yet implemented." - is there any timetable > for it? > > 3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the > servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here) > In Windows this is possible with a "Workaround", t...

...> a client's site are listed first in a referral. Nevertheless i can >>> choose between: Random order, Lowest cost, Exclude targets outside of >>> the client's site). Is it possible to achieve something similar with a >>> samba DFS? >>> >>> 2. DFSR within samba is "not yet implemented." - is there any timetable >>> for it? >>> >>> 3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the >>> servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here) >>> In Windows this is p...

...he requested operation". Existing GPOs seem to work. - dcdiag fails the test VerifyReferences, complaining like [1] Problem: Missing Expected Value Base Object: CN=AD2008,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=abc,DC=com Base Object Description: "DC Account Object" Value Object Attribute Name: msDFSR-ComputerReferenceBL Value Object Description: "SYSVOL FRS Member Object" Recommended Action: Please See Knowledge Base Article Q312862 - FRS Service is disabled, DFS service is running, so it seems this DC would like to use DFS for SYSVOL replication. dfsrmig /getmigrationstate says the...

...ta Name="IpPort">-</Data> </EventData> </Event> PS Z:\> dcdiag.exe /s:dc1 Directory Server Diagnosis Performing initial setup: * Identified AD Forest. [dc1] An LDAP operation failed with error 31 Got error while checking if the DC is using FRS or DFSR. Error: A device attached to the system is not functioning.The VerifyReferences, FrsEvent and DfsrEvent tests might fail because of this error. Done gathering initial info. Doing initial required tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 Starting test: Connectivity...

...C3,CN=microlynx.com,CN=Microsoft System Volumes,CN=System,CN=Configuration,DC=microlynx,DC=com Removing Sysvol reference: CN=DC3,CN=Domain System Volumes (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=microlynx,DC=com Removing Sysvol reference: CN=DC3,CN=Topology,CN=Domain System Volume,CN=DFSR-GlobalSettings,CN=System,DC=microlynx,DC=com Demote successful root at dc3:~# but it leaves the demoted DC's DNS entries in place. So there's still something missing in the demote process. Thanks, spindles7 On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:20:22 +0100, spindles7 <spindles7-2 at yahoo.co.uk&g...

On 9/19/2016 1:37 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:19:08 +0200 > Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: >>> >>> Am 19.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:57:38 -0400 >>>> Adam