search for: devoid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: > I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is > it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape to an alternate > location? The user may or may not exist at this time, but I still need > to inspect the mailbox ... thank you, yes - -- Steffen Kaiser

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >> >>> I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is >>> it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >> On Dec 9, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie

On 12/10/2014 01:54 PM, Stephen Lidie wrote: > The reason I did not see -o is because that option is NOT documented in the man pages for my dovecot installation, for whatever reason! Either of our egreps would have found it if only it had been there :( > > [root]# man doveadm|egrep -i '\-v' > -v Enables verbosity, including progress counter. > [root]# man

dovecot --version 2.2.10 I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape to an alternate location? The user may or may not exist at this time, but I still need to inspect the mailbox ... thank you, Steve

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388 Summary: Parts of auth2-pubkey.c are completely devoid of debug logging Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd Assi...

> On Dec 10, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >>> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>>>> On Dec 9,

> On Dec 9, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: >>> >>>>

> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Stephen Lidie wrote: > >> I've only be able to status a mailbox for currently existing users, is it possible to status a mailbox reloaded from tape to an alternate location? The user may or may

Good afternoon Support Team, I have discovered a disturbing error inside?anaconda-ks.cfg under the /root directory. Examination found the config file devoid of the string "buns". It's distressing, because I don't understand how my Anaconda can get anything done if it doesn't happen to have any buns. Please advise I need to know how to continue. Please feel free to contact me below. Mr. Mixalot

...penalty in the judging). Please send images and source code (and data) used to produce them, to paul at stat.auckland.ac.nz The competition will last until January 31st 2004, or until we die waiting, whichever happens first. R-core reserves the right to decide that the R user base is just as devoid of artistic talent as R-core itself; we only promise to make use of zero or more of the submitted images on the web site. The R-core development team.

...12 months (I last looked into this about a year ago). Can you point out a URL to the info. Actually, not really the info, but any opinions regarding this from artists, radio stations, mailing list discussions, etc. I'm sure the RIAA has a page or two up about this, but it's probably devoid of reasoning, etc. Thanks for the heads up. Sujal > Online radio is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than on-the-air radio. You MUST > follow the RIAA guidelines for non-interactive broadcasts for online > radio, and you do not have to follow these for on-the-air radio. > > This isn't a...

...an implementation more or less inspired by the one found in > > core/legacynet/dnsresolv.c. > > > > Since it's non-trivial, I'd like to ask for a deep review of this > > code. I tried to make it as strong as possible against malformed > > packets and should be devoided of remote code execution or infinite > > loops (contrary to the legacynet implementation), but I may have > > forgotten something. I would take any comment, > > even on the coding style. :) > > > > I made a few tests, it worked correctly with a normal dns > > s...

...cause problems. Yet, I don't know if I can trust samba 3 -- Has anyone been able to get a samba 2.x server to join a an Active Directory domain? My assumptions are the joining Active Directory is 'different' than joining an nt style 'domain'. The samba.org sites seems to be devoid if documents detailing what I really want... which is 1) having samba auth users against active directory -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax: 480-965-9189 College of Public Programs/ASU Wilson Hall 232 Tempe, AZ 85287-0803 "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespas...

...x for the motherboard is too small. I have read up about a PWR2400b and it seems to use 2wire pin, I am guessing to connect to P8 just behind the molex connector on the tdm410. can any one here confirm this, or have any info on the pwr2400b - ie how it connects to the cards. The web site is a bit devoid of the information and all the photo's are not clear. this would make my life rather simple, I have 12V + GND to supply the card - seems like people have done this with a TDM400, unfortunately the 410 is longer .... Alex -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrub...

...is meant is https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/ At least, that is where the "downloads" page of syslinux.org directs you. Under there are the various source tarballs (tar.gz format, tar.bz2 format). Also a directory called RPMS/. But that kernel.org RPMS/ directory is devoid of any content. Secondly, I realize mixing binaries/executables during a given boot session would be a problem. but I don't think that's the situtation here, not even getting to apscp TFTP request of ldlinux.e64. However, your answer got me further along. It's not clearly spelled ou...

...user X?s mail store (the INBOX, btw, is named ?cur?) - move all to be changed messages there using the mail client - kill the mail client - stop dovecot - edit the messages and change the names of the files so the S= W= parts are in line with the new content. (I understand S, but what is W?) - run ?devoid index -u user REPAIR? - start dovecot - start email client (potentially, reload the entire mail store for that user) Would that work? G

...of many large objects. In any given analysis, I only need a few of those objects, but attach'ing the whole database is fine since objects are only read as needed. How can I do the same thing in R, without reading the entire database? One possibility is to treat the database as a package, devoid of code but containing many .RData files under /data, then load() each object I'll need. Perhaps autoload() can be used to avoid having to anticipate which objects I'll need? Another is to use dput and dget. Again I need to know ahead of time which objects I'll want. On July 20...

...oment) has no native DNS resolver. I propose here an implementation more or less inspired by the one found in core/legacynet/dnsresolv.c. Since it's non-trivial, I'd like to ask for a deep review of this code. I tried to make it as strong as possible against malformed packets and should be devoided of remote code execution or infinite loops (contrary to the legacynet implementation), but I may have forgotten something. I would take any comment, even on the coding style. :) I made a few tests, it worked correctly with a normal dns server. Didn't test malformed packets. Here are the tw...

...by the one found in >>> > core/legacynet/dnsresolv.c. >>> > >>> > Since it's non-trivial, I'd like to ask for a deep review of this >>> > code. I tried to make it as strong as possible against malformed >>> > packets and should be devoided of remote code execution or infinite >>> > loops (contrary to the legacynet implementation), but I may have >>> > forgotten something. I would take any comment, >>> > even on the coding style. :) >>> > >>> > I made a few tests, it worked...