search for: devlink

...And move mlx5_core module name to general include, so auxiliary drivers > > will be able to use it as a basis for a name in their device ID tables. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 4 +--- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 1 - > > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib/ethtool.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c...

...o host networking stack >> >> I would like to hear what you think about this or maybe you have some other ideas to address this topic. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli > Something I'm not sure I understand is how are vdpa instances created on mellanox cards? There's a devlink command for that, is that right? > Can that be extended for stats? > > Currently any VF will be probed as VDPA device. We're adding devlink support but I am not sure if devlink is suitable for displaying statistics. We will discuss internally but I wanted to know why you guys think....

...39;s only the offload cases which > > need this sort of fallback. > > Of course not, almost any error unwind path which sets extack will need it. I guess we can come up with scenarios where the new behavior would be useful. But the fact is - your patch changes 4 places... > See devlink as an example I don't know what part of devlink you mean at a quick scroll.

I tried to use cdrom in domU linux pv (Linux Mint 11 based on Natty). With ''/mnt/vm/iso/test.iso,raw,xvdb,ro,cdrom'', Mint sees it as internal disk (not cdrom) and only administrators can mount it. I tried also ''/dev/scd0,raw,xvdb,ro,cdrom'' does the same thing. Is possible use cdrom on linux domU pv full working where also normal user can mount it without

...MINOR=64 E: DEVNAME=/dev/input/event0 E: SUBSYSTEM=input E: ID_INPUT=1 E: ID_INPUT_KEY=1 E: ID_INPUT_KEYBOARD=1 E: ID_SERIAL=noserial E: ID_PATH=platform-i8042-serio-0 E: XKBMODEL=pc105 E: XKBLAYOUT=fr E: XKBVARIANT=latin9 E: XKBOPTIONS=lv3:ralt_switch E: x11_driver=evdev E: DMI_VENDOR=Dell Inc. E: DEVLINKS=/dev/char/13:64 /dev/input/by-path/platform-i8042-serio-0-event-kbd P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0D:00/input/input1/event1 N: input/event1 S: char/13:65 E: UDEV_LOG=3 E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0D:00/input/input1/event1 E: MAJOR=13 E: MINOR=65 E: DEVNAME=/dev/inp...

...such a case > > > > I would like to hear what you think about this or maybe you have some other ideas to address this topic. > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > Something I'm not sure I understand is how are vdpa instances created on mellanox cards? There's a devlink command for that, is that right? > Can that be extended for stats? > > Currently any VF will be probed as VDPA device. We're adding devlink support but I am not sure if devlink is suitable for displaying statistics. We will discuss internally but I wanted to know why you guys think....

...ke in other parts of the mlx5 driver. * Renamed MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VDPA to tbe MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VNET as a preparation to coming series from Eli C. * Some small naming renames in mlx5_vdpa. * Refactored adev index code to make Parav's SF series to apply more easily. * Fixed devlink reload bug that caused to lost TCP connection. v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201026111849.1035786-1-leon at kernel.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, This patch set converts mlx5 driver to use auxiliary bus [1]. In this series, we are connecting three s...

...isp_core_fini+0x107/0x160 [nouveau Aug 02 14:19:42 localhost.localdomain kernel: Device: nouveau timeout Aug 02 14:19:42 localhost.localdomain kernel: Modules linked in: tcp_lp ext4 mbcache jbd2 fuse xt_CHECKSUM ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 tun devlink ip6t_rpfilter ip Aug 02 14:19:42 localhost.localdomain kernel: irqbypass crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul snd_hda_intel glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd snd_hda_codec Aug 02 14:19:42 localhost.localdomain kernel: e1000e drm crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common libata crc32c_in...

...ter_child(struct net_device *child_netdev) >+{ >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+#endif >+ >+#endif /* _NET_BYPASS_H */ >diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig >index 0428f12c25c2..994445f4a96a 100644 >--- a/net/Kconfig >+++ b/net/Kconfig >@@ -423,6 +423,24 @@ config MAY_USE_DEVLINK > on MAY_USE_DEVLINK to ensure they do not cause link errors when > devlink is a loadable module and the driver using it is built-in. > >+config NET_BYPASS >+ tristate "Bypass interface" >+ ---help--- >+ This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drive...

...return 0; +} + +static inline int bypass_unregister_child(struct net_device *child_netdev) +{ + return 0; +} + +#endif + +#endif /* _NET_BYPASS_H */ diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig index 0428f12c25c2..994445f4a96a 100644 --- a/net/Kconfig +++ b/net/Kconfig @@ -423,6 +423,24 @@ config MAY_USE_DEVLINK on MAY_USE_DEVLINK to ensure they do not cause link errors when devlink is a loadable module and the driver using it is built-in. +config NET_BYPASS + tristate "Bypass interface" + ---help--- + This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen + for netdev...

Hi! I've installed NUT 2.0.2 to work with my MGE Protection Center and it works but for one thing. When I reboot the computer, at startup upsdrvctl/newhidups can't find the UPS so I have to manually unplug, replug and start upsdrvctl/upsd every time. I've installed from sourcecode onto a Gentoo machine. Where should I look for the problem (USB/hotplug/newhidups/somewhere else)?

...by a user. It should be ignored by certain s/w with lldpd as just an > *example*. Two approaches: 1) Add an IFF_CONTROL and make userspace understand this. It is probably long overdue. 2) Design the driver properly. Have a non-netdev master device like mlxsw does, and control it using devlink or similar. This is exactly how this stuff was meant to be architected. > From there I think you are confusing my intentions: I fundamentally do > not believe the kernel should be hiding anything from an admin. Not > showing data by default is completely different than not showing tha...

...ome proposals during the discussion of mdev >> approach. But I'm not sure if he had any RFC codes for me to integrate it >> into vdpasim. >> >> Or do you want me to propose the netlink API? If yes, would you prefer to a >> new virtio dedicated one or be a subset of devlink? > Well, lets see what feed back Parav has > > Jason Hi Parav: Do you have any update on this? If it still require sometime, I will post V2 that sticks to sysfs based API. Thanks

...des > networking to a guest. The VDPA driver creates the necessary resources > on the VF it is driving such that data path will be offloaded. > > Notifications are being communicated through the driver. > > Currently, only VFs are supported. In subsequent patches we will have > devlink support to control which VF is used for VDPA and which function > is used for regular networking. > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit<parav at mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen<eli at mellanox.com> > --- > Changes from V0: > 1. Fix include path usage > 2. Fix us...

...des > networking to a guest. The VDPA driver creates the necessary resources > on the VF it is driving such that data path will be offloaded. > > Notifications are being communicated through the driver. > > Currently, only VFs are supported. In subsequent patches we will have > devlink support to control which VF is used for VDPA and which function > is used for regular networking. > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit<parav at mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen<eli at mellanox.com> > --- Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>

...nfiguration. Ethtool can be used in such a case > > I would like to hear what you think about this or maybe you have some other ideas to address this topic. > > Thanks, > Eli Something I'm not sure I understand is how are vdpa instances created on mellanox cards? There's a devlink command for that, is that right? Can that be extended for stats? -- MST

...elevant Architectures: sparc BugId's fixed with this patch: 4337350 Changes incorporated in this version: 4337350 Patches accumulated and obsoleted by this patch: Patches which conflict with this patch: Patches required with this patch: Obsoleted by: Files included with this patch: /etc/devlink.tab /etc/minor_perm /kernel/drv/random /kernel/drv/random.conf /kernel/drv/sparcv9/random /usr/include/sys/random.h /usr/lib/mdb/kvm/random.so /usr/lib/mdb/kvm/sparcv9/random.so Problem Description: 4337350 RFE - Solaris should have /dev/random Patch Installation Instructions: ------------------...

...e try: - a touch /reconfigure: doesn''t help - a forceload in /etc/system: doesn''t help The only hack we found is to pkgrm the driver and pkgadd the driver again after a dom U restart. Pseudo Driver installation is done the following way: # pkgadd -d ... SUNWegcff that adds /etc/devlink.tab: type=ddi_pseudo;name=ffmod ffmod\M0 /etc/minor_perm: clone:ffmod 0600 root sys and does /usr/sbin/add_drv -v ffmod /usr/sbin/devfsadm -i ffmod # modinfo -c | grep ffmod 194 2 ffmod LOADED/INSTALLED # # ls -al /dev/*ff* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other...

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:32:13 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> > > > > In netdev common pattern, xxtack pointer is forwarded to the drivers > ~~~~~~ > extack > > > to be filled with error

...: 000000000000000a R09: 00005649fcee96f0 R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fca33c0c760 R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007fca33c07760 R15: 0000000000000002 Modules linked in: nouveau ttm ipt_MASQUERADE xt_CHECKSUM ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 tun bridge stp llc ebtable_filter ebtables devlink ip6table_filter ip6_tables pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) iptable_mangle xt_nat iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack libcrc32c crc32c_generic cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_conservative iptable_f...