search for: delink

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from backports.org and is built for sarge. deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Enjoy, - -- http://www.delink.net/ Ok, so he's got a cellphone in one hand and latte in the other, I know what he's using to steer, but what is that soccer mom using, a strap-on? - Brian Kantor in the monastery -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1...

...> decisions, we had to allow the network path to this OU as well and > hence the GPO was modified. > > Despite running gpupdate / force several times, it is observed that > the changed GPO is not getting applied and the network path is still > being blocked. We even checked by delinking all GPO for this > particular OU and the same old GPOs are getting reapplied. > > Initially, we thought, there could be a problem in gpupdate /force may > not be working properly and did checks using commands like "sfc > /scannow" and the result is everything was fine...

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:27:44 +0530 Anantha Raghava via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We did not modify anything but yes, we did delink the default domain > controller policy. > Then relink it, you need it, but don't modify it, or the other default policy. Rowland

...I see the config.h.in file in the root dir, but I cannot figure out what the brackets are for. If I modify the file and remove the brackets, it works properly and I can compile dovecot. What are the brackets in the name for? Am I breaking something by removing them? Thanks, -- Brian T Glenn delink.net Internet Services -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050605/5af17e17/attachment-0001.bin>

...ough GPO due to organisation decisions, we had to allow the network path to this OU as well and hence the GPO was modified. Despite running gpupdate / force several times, it is observed that the changed GPO is not getting applied and the network path is still being blocked. We even checked by delinking all GPO for this particular OU and the same old GPOs are getting reapplied. Initially, we thought, there could be a problem in gpupdate /force may not be working properly and did checks using commands like "sfc /scannow" and the result is everything was fine on the PCs. But gpupdat...

Hey- Just wanna say that I'm really happy with Dovecot, it has worked really well for my small operation. I do have a couple problems I'd just like to bring to everyone's attention for future bugfixes and if there is a solution available. I'm using dovecot-0.99.10-6 with a clean fedora core 1 install. I'm using primarily IMAP with OpenSSL, however a few people use POP3

Hi there, i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge). Anyone here that has a backported package? Greetings, Moritz

...d_send(-1) failed: Broken pipe This is with SSL on or off, I have tried building the source many different ways, but it behaves the same every time. I even copied the config from a working installation and tried it with that, but to no avail. Any insight would be appreciated. -- Brian T Glenn delink.net Internet Services -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20040405/3bc3020b/attachment-0001.bin>

Is there any way to addon the ability to have dovecot auto create imap folders for a user ? -- Chris L. Franklin

...m as well. Virtual users go into /home/vmail/mailstore/$username/ System users go into /home/$username/Maildir How can I have both of these available as inboxes in dovecot using ldap logins? Do I need to use namespaces or am i missing something with default_mail_env? Thanks, -- Brian T Glenn delink.net Internet Services

Hi, I would like to try implementing user specific default_mail_env's as described here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/MailLocation using the LDAP attribute 'mailLocation'. However, I have been unable to find any LDAP schema which contains mailLocation. What schema is this attribute part of? Thanks, Jason Pepas

Hi, I'm still getting the errors below on Debian Etch with Dovecot 1.0.8-4 and Dovecot LDA. Is this something that's fixed in 1.0.9? It doesn't seem to have an effect but I'm wary of messages I don't recognise! Regards, Alex Jun 20 14:13:04 server01 deliver: entered bc_action_emit with filelen: 16 Jun 20 14:13:04 server01 deliver: entered bc_action_emit with filelen: 112

It sounded like there was going to be one, so that some of the fixes that didn't make it into rc7 could be easily tested before releasing 1.0? -- Best regards, Charles

Hello, Here is an issue. I am trying to make dovecot work with sendmail If I use the default conf file (default_mail_env = ) then the inbox is the file /var/mail/user and a mail folder is created in /home/user directory where it stores all additional imap folders. The problem with this is that I can?t have subfolders. If I edit dovecot.conf file and enter default_mail_env =

Has anyone considered setting up a Dovecot public server to serve the list archives by IMAP? Or does Dovecot not do anonymous read-only access? (I note by comparison that the Cyrusoft Mulberry list archives are served by an IMAP server. <http://www.cyrusoft.com/mulberry/support/anonimap.html>) It should be sufficient to set up Dovecot on some server in the dovecot.org domain and

Dear all, How can I use dovecot for both "real" users and virtual users? I could configure dovecot for real users, by using these lines in /etc/dovecot.conf: default_mail_env = maildir:%h/Maildir auth default { passdb pam { } userdb passwd { } } To accept virtual users, I used these lines: default_mail_env = maildir:/usr/local/virtual/%u/ auth default { passdb sql {

Ok, here's my situation. I currently run IMail 7.x with about 80 domains and nearly 4000 users. I want to switch this to a Linux server. I'm using Virtualmin to manage the users/postfix. I have dovecot working just peachy with the setup, except for one problem. We are an ISP. The easiest thing for us (and our users) is to have them use their full email address as their username.

After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers. But any comments on which one is better: a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.YYYYMMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable) b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable) With a) style the releases could be done by simply copying a nightly snapshot to releases/ directory and announcing the changes since the last