Displaying 20 results from an estimated 541 matches for "deviding".
Did you mean:
deciding
2007 May 08
0
Bug#422819: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae
Version: 3.0.3-0-2
Hi!
the error suddenly appeared when rebooting one of the etch instances
using xm reboot <name> on our etch server
DEVIDE:~# DEVIDE kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
DEVIDE kernel: CPU: 3
DEVIDE:~# Message from syslogd@DEVIDE at Tue May 8 11:45:27 2007 ...
Message from syslogd@DEVIDE at Tue May 8 11:45:27 2007
2012 Sep 05
3
BTRFS thinks device is busy [kernel 3.5.3]
Hi,
I''m running OpenSuse 12.2 with kernel 3.5.3
HBA= LSI 1068e using the MPTSAS driver (patched)
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1379181/)
SANOS1:/media # uname -a
Linux SANOS1 3.5.3 #3 SMP Sun Sep 2 18:44:37 CEST 2012 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
I''ve tried to simulate a disk replacement but it seems that now
/dev/sdg is stuck in the btrfs pool (RAID10)
SANOS1:/media #
2009 Feb 26
2
BUG: Mount/Unmount Loop
Hello Developers,
it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries
mainframe :-)
## Test environment:
- IBM System z900 Mainframe
- Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel
- GIT Sources from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git
- System runs as z/VM guest
- 3 Virtual CPUs
- 1 GB RAM Storage
## Initial Test Setup
- Setup a Debian SID System with
2008 Sep 05
0
raidz pool metadata corrupted nexanta-core->freenas 0.7->nexanta-core
I made a bad judgment and now my raidz pool is corrupted. I have a
raidz pool running on Opensolaris b85. I wanted to try out freenas 0.7
and tried to add my pool to freenas.
After adding the zfs disk,
vdev and pool. I decided to back out and went back to opensolaris. Now
my raidz pool will not mount and got the following errors. Hope someone
expert can help me recover from this error.
2013 May 24
3
[BUG, PATCH] xen-4.1-3 xend/XendDomainInfo.py#device_configure() TypeError
Hello,
I noticed a bug in Xen-4.1-3, which is also still present in xen+git.
I know that the Python xend is deprecated, but I''m stuck with xen-4.1 until xen is usable with libvirt, so my patch might still be helpful for others.
This is a follow-up to <http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2012-11/msg00069.html>, which still keeps me busy.
/xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py
2013 Jul 22
69
[xen-unstable] Commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, makes dom0 boot process stall several times.
Hi Jan,
After commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, booting dom0 stalls several times.
Sometimes this results in RCU stall warnings from the dom0 kernel, hitting the "any" key, on normal or serial console, makes the boot continue for a while but it stalls several times.
(It also stalls on shutdown BTW)
I have
2011 Nov 22
1
Recovering data from old corrupted file system
I have a corrupted multi-device file system that got corrupted ages
ago (as I recall, one of the drives stopped responding, causing btrfs
to panic). I am hoping to recover some of the data. For what it''s
worth, here is the dmesg output from trying to mount the file system
on a 3.0 kernel:
device label Media devid 6 transid 816153 /dev/sdq
device label Media devid 7 transid 816153
2012 Feb 26
0
"device delete" kills contents
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I''ve (once again) tried "add" and "delete".
First, with 3 devices (partitions):
mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 /dev/sdm1
Mounted (to /mnt/btr), filled with about 100 GByte data.
Then
btrfs device add /dev/sdj1 /mnt/btr
results in
# show
Label: none uuid: 6bd7d4df-e133-47d1-9b19-3c7565428770
Total devices 4 FS bytes
2010 Oct 26
0
XCP 0.5 killing umanaged domain (BUG?)
1) Misspelled message ''killing umanaged domain'' (must be killing
UNmanaged domain)
2) more serious. I found this message after disappearance of virtual
machine created early. I restart XAPI tool stack and machine was killed
(not shutdowned, but completely removing). Here log (from machine where
domain was resident)
Main line in log file I suspect:
2012 Apr 23
5
'filesystem resize max' tries to use devid 1
Back story:
I started my pool with a 200gb partition at the end of my drive (sdc5)
, until I was able to clear out the data at the beginning of my drive.
When I was ready, I ran `btrfs dev add /dev/sdc4 /` then `btrfs dev
del /dev/sdc5 /`,
$ sudo btrfs fi resize max /
Resize ''/'' of ''max''
ERROR: unable to resize ''/'' - Invalid argument
in
2013 Feb 11
25
Xen 4.2.1 boot failure with IOMMU enabled
Hi all
I already posted about this problem on xen-users some time ago
(http://markmail.org/message/sbgtyjqh6bzmqx4s) but I couldn''t
resolve my problem using help from people on xen-users, so I''m posting here .
I have a problem with enabling IOMMU on Xen 4.2.1. When I enable it in BIOS
and in grub.conf using iommu=1 kernel option, my machine cannot boot.
I get a following error
2013 May 13
7
Remove a materially failed device from a Btrfs "single-raid" using partitions
Hello,
I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8.
I''ve created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard
drives has failed, I mean it''s materially dead.
:~$ sudo btrfs filesystem show
Label: none uuid: 40886f51-8c9b-4be1-8721-83bf5653d2a0
Total devices 5 FS bytes used 226.90GB
devid 4 size 37.27GB used 31.01GB path /dev/sdd1
2012 May 04
2
btrfs scrub BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
I think I have some failing hard drives, they are disconnected for now.
stan {~} root# btrfs filesystem show
Label: none uuid: d71404d4-468e-47d5-8f06-3b65fa7776aa
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 6.27GB
devid 1 size 9.31GB used 8.16GB path /dev/sde6
*** Some devices missing
Label: none uuid: b142f575-df1c-4a57-8846-a43b979e2e09
Total devices 8 FS bytes used
2013 Oct 07
2
Some questions after devices addition to existing raid 1 btrfs filesystem
Hi,
I have added 2x2Tb to my existing 2x2Tb raid 1 btrfs filesystem and
then ran a balance:
# btrfs filesystem show
Total devices 4 FS bytes used 1.74TB
devid 3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdd
devid 4 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sde
devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /dev/sdc
devid 1 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /dev/sdb
# btrfs
2020 Apr 14
0
[PATCH v2 15/33] iommu/amd: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Convert the AMD IOMMU Driver to use the probe_device() and
release_device() call-backs of iommu_ops, so that the iommu core code
does the group and sysfs setup.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
---
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 71 ++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff
2013 Mar 28
1
question about replacing a drive in raid10
Hi all,
I have a question about replacing a drive in raid10 (and linux kernel 3.8.4).
A bad disk was physical removed from the server. After this a new disk
was added with "btrfs device add /dev/sdg /btrfs" to the raid10 btrfs
FS.
After this the server was rebooted and I mounted the filesystem in
degraded mode. It seems that a previous started balance continued.
At this point I want to
2013 Aug 16
2
[PATCH] xfstests: update filters and output of btrfs/006
The btrfs-progs tools changed the output:
- 100GiB instead of 100GB
- The number of spaces was changed
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
---
common/filter | 2 +-
common/filter.btrfs | 3 ++-
tests/btrfs/006 | 6 +++---
tests/btrfs/006.out | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
2013 Jan 17
2
btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -22
I booted the guest in which i was testing btrfs (transient ENOSPC
issues, etc). It booted in emergency mode.
[ 6.705187] device label testfs1 devid 1 transid 4141 /dev/sdb1
[ 6.724353] device label fedora devid 1 transid 2036 /dev/sda2
[ 6.780931] device label fedora devid 1 transid 2036 /dev/sda2
[ 6.817157] snd_hda_intel 0000:00:04.0: irq 42 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 6.818326]
2002 Jun 27
1
Building from a source-code library under windows
Dear All,
I have a pair of .cpp and .def file can be compiled using VC++ and works
perfectly well in S-PLUS.
I wanted to do the same for R; so I followed the guidline given in "Building
from a source-code library under Windows" as much as possible and manage to
compile them using VC++ and call it from R. But it gives different answer
from the one called from S-Plus.
I know that I did
2012 Jan 13
5
Can't resize second device in RAID1
Hi,
the situation:
Label: ''RootFS'' uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB
devid 2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3
devid 1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3
RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB.
I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated
it occupying all