search for: dev64_t

OK. Didn't see anything about this in the archives, other than an old post from 2000 about a similar problem, so here goes. Feel free to contact me if I can provide anything else useful. Problem: -------- Major numbers on 64bit Solaris are being dropped, and created as 0 on recieving end. 32bit version works perfectly. Environment: ------------ Solaris 8 or Solaris 9 (haven't tried

Two patches: one to correct the spelling of permissions (in comments, but such typos disturb me as well), and one to cast inode and dev to unsigned long before comparing, to prevent gcc giving a warning "comparison between signed and unsigned". Paul Slootman -------------- next part -------------- diff -ru orig/rsync-2.5.6/generator.c rsync-2.5.6/generator.c ---

...ntf(FINFO, "%s %11.0f %s %s %s\n", perms, (double) f->length, timestring(f->modtime), - f_name(f)); + timestring(f->atime), f_name(f)); } @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ { unsigned short flags; static time_t modtime; + static time_t atime; static mode_t mode; static DEV64_T rdev, rdev_high; static DEV64_T dev; @@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ if (!file) { write_byte(f, 0); - modtime = 0, mode = 0; + modtime = 0, atime = 0, mode = 0; rdev = 0, rdev_high = 0, dev = 0; uid = 0, gid = 0; *lastname = '\0'; @@ -386,6 +387,12 @@ flags |= XMIT_SAME_TIME; e...

...ckup_only) + return; if (do_symlink(file->link,fname) != 0) { rprintf(FERROR,RSYNC_NAME": symlink \"%s\" -> \"%s\": %s\n", fname,file->link,strerror(errno)); @@ -384,6 +398,8 @@ if (statret != 0 || st.st_mode != file->mode || (DEV64_T)st.st_rdev != file->rdev) { + if (backup_only) + return; delete_file(fname); if (verbose > 2) rprintf(FINFO,"mknod(%s,0%o,0x%x)\n", @@ -396,6 +412,8 @@ rprintf(FINFO,"%s\n",fname); } } else { + if (backup_only) + return; set_perms(fn...

...nd Unixware 1.1.2. - Dave Dykstra On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:00:24PM -0800, Martin Pool wrote: > > Date: Fri Jan 25 15:00:21 2002 > Author: mbp > > Update of /data/cvs/rsync > In directory va:/tmp/cvs-serv24773 > > Modified Files: > rsync.h > Log Message: > DEV64_t and INO64_T should probably be unsigned > > > Revisions: > rsync.h 1.120 => 1.121 > http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/rsync.h?r1=1.120&r2=1.121

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20030728/49616c2f/attachment.bin

Trying to compile rsync 2.5.2 after "./configure --prefix=/usr" I get the following make errors: gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c rsync.c -o rsync.o In file included from rsync.c:23: rsync.h:339: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rsync.h:339: parse error before `inode' rsync.h:341: parse error before `dev' rsync.h:341: warning: type

...king compiler flags for position-independent code... > checking for long long... no > checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes > checking for 64 bit off_t... no > checking for off64_t... no > checking for 64 bit ino_t... no > checking for ino64_t... no > checking for dev64_t... no > checking for struct dirent64... yes > checking for major macro... no > checking for minor macro... no > checking for makedev macro... no > checking for unsigned char... no > checking for sin_len in sock... no > checking whether seekdir returns void... yes > checking...

...2-02-14 05:42:20.000000000 +1100 > +++ rsync-2.5.4-fuzzy/receiver.c 2002-04-03 16:46:46.000000000 +1000 > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > extern char *compare_dest; > extern int make_backups; > extern char *backup_suffix; > +extern int fuzzy; > > static struct delete_list { > DEV64_T dev; > @@ -307,8 +308,6 @@ > char *fname; > char template[MAXPATHLEN]; > char fnametmp[MAXPATHLEN]; > - char *fnamecmp; > - char fnamecmpbuf[MAXPATHLEN]; > struct map_struct *buf; > int i; > struct file_struct *file; > @@ -366,28 +365,24 @@ > if (verb...

...or shared libraries... -shared checking compiler flags for position-independent code... checking for long long... no checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes checking for 64 bit off_t... no checking for off64_t... no checking for 64 bit ino_t... no checking for ino64_t... no checking for dev64_t... no checking for struct dirent64... yes checking for major macro... no checking for minor macro... no checking for makedev macro... no checking for unsigned char... no checking for sin_len in sock... no checking whether seekdir returns void... yes checking for __FILE__ macro... yes checking for _...

...or shared libraries... -shared checking compiler flags for position-independent code... checking for long long... no checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes checking for 64 bit off_t... no checking for off64_t... no checking for 64 bit ino_t... no checking for ino64_t... no checking for dev64_t... no checking for struct dirent64... yes checking for major macro... no checking for minor macro... no checking for makedev macro... no checking for unsigned char... no checking for sin_len in sock... no checking whether seekdir returns void... yes checking for __FILE__ macro... yes checking for _...

...pendent code configure:9051: checking for long long configure:9092: checking for LL suffix on long long integers configure:9127: checking for 64 bit off_t configure:9165: checking for off64_t configure:9207: checking for 64 bit ino_t configure:9245: checking for ino64_t configure:9287: checking for dev64_t configure:9329: checking for struct dirent64 configure:9368: checking for major macro configure:9409: checking for minor macro configure:9450: checking for makedev macro configure:9491: checking for unsigned char configure:9528: checking for sin_len in sock configure:9564: checking whether seekdir...

...... no checking whether cc accepts -KPIC... no checking whether cc accepts -Kpic... no checking for long long... yes checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes checking for 64 bit off_t... no checking for off64_t... no checking for 64 bit ino_t... no checking for ino64_t... no checking for dev64_t... no checking for struct dirent64... no checking for major macro... no checking for minor macro... no checking for makedev macro... no checking for unsigned char... no checking for sin_len in sock... no checking whether seekdir returns void... no checking for __FILE__ macro... yes checking for __F...

Hello, I am running HP-UX 11 with Samba 2.2.5 binaries for HPUX and I keep getting the error that Samba can't find the unicode_map.xxx file. Well, I notice that all I have in /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages is codepage type files, not unicode. Why do the binaries not include a compiled make_unicodemap? I did download the source and found the .c file for the command. When I try to run

...compiler flags for position-independent code... checking whether building shared libraries actually works... yes checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes checking for 64 bit off_t... no checking for off64_t... yes checking for 64 bit ino_t... no checking for ino64_t... yes checking for dev64_t... no checking for struct dirent64... yes checking for major macro... no checking for minor macro... no checking for unsigned char... no checking for sin_len in sock... no checking whether seekdir returns void... yes checking for __FUNCTION__ macro... yes checking if gettimeofday takes tz argument....

...r position-independent code... checking for long long... (cached) yes checking for LL suffix on long long integers... (cached) yes checking for 64 bit off_t... (cached) yes checking for off64_t... (cached) no checking for 64 bit ino_t... (cached) no checking for ino64_t... (cached) no checking for dev64_t... (cached) no checking for struct dirent64... (cached) no checking for major macro... (cached) yes checking for minor macro... (cached) yes checking for makedev macro... (cached) yes checking for unsigned char... (cached) no checking for sin_len in sock... (cached) no checking whether seekdir retu...

I've downloaded the binary Samba 2.0.7 for AIX. I have no idea how to install this critter. Can anyone walk me thru this step by step? I think once i have it running, I'll be able to configure it based on the info at samba.org. It's just getting it running that troubles me. I have some experience with *nix, but not with compliling (sorry, no C compliler on system) and installing

...r position-independent code... checking for long long... (cached) yes checking for LL suffix on long long integers... (cached) yes checking for 64 bit off_t... (cached) yes checking for off64_t... (cached) no checking for 64 bit ino_t... (cached) yes checking for ino64_t... (cached) no checking for dev64_t... (cached) no checking for struct dirent64... (cached) yes checking for major macro... (cached) yes checking for minor macro... (cached) yes checking for makedev macro... (cached) yes checking for unsigned char... (cached) no checking for sin_len in sock... (cached) no checking whether seekdir ret...

...independent code... checking whether building shared libraries actually works... yes checking for long long... yes checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes checking for 64 bit off_t... yes checking for off64_t... no checking for 64 bit ino_t... yes checking for ino64_t... no checking for dev64_t... no checking for struct dirent64... yes checking for major macro... yes checking for minor macro... yes checking for unsigned char... no checking for sin_len in sock... no checking whether seekdir returns void... yes checking for __FUNCTION__ macro... yes checking if gettimeofday takes tz argumen...

...shared libraries... -shared checking compiler flags for position-independent code... checking for long long... yes checking for LL suffix on long long integers... yes checking for 64 bit off_t... yes checking for off64_t... no checking for 64 bit ino_t... no checking for ino64_t... no checking for dev64_t... no checking for struct dirent64... no checking for major macro... yes checking for minor macro... yes checking for makedev macro... yes checking for unsigned char... no checking for sin_len in sock... no checking whether seekdir returns void... no checking for __FILE__ macro... yes checking for...