search for: detestable

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 106 matches for "detestable".

Did you mean: detectable
2004 Feb 11
6
Spelling (PR#6570)
I came across this in connection with an unrelated issue > beta[2] Error in beta[2] : object is not subsettable > beta[2] <- 5 Error in "[<-"(`*tmp*`, 2, value = 5) : object is not subsetable One of the messages must be wrong, but I need a native English speaker to tell me which one. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of
2008 Nov 20
2
A way to run extenrnotify when IMAP events take place...
I have IMAP voicemail working with Exchange 2003 using a single username and password for multiple mailboxes. Right now, I am setting up asterisk to use voicemail with my Cisco Call Manager (Which I detest BTW...) and I have everything working, EXCEPT: I cannot get my externnotify script to run when any changes have been made to the VoiceMail... Scenario: Bob gets a call -> Bob
2023 Jun 23
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: Unable to authenticate to share using UPN
Sorry about that I typed and sent a full message, but it looks like the entire body got swallowed up in transit. Here is the full text again. Let's hope this one works. I have a server running CentOS 7.9 with the system provided Samba packages (4.10.16-24.el7_9). It is joined to an Active Directory domain and acting as a member server. The active Directory domain has a user object with among
2011 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends
On 6/3/2011 3:19 PM, Samuel Crow wrote: > Why not runtime checks? The constant folding and dead-code elimination passes would get rid of any redundant code in a later stage of compilation anyway. The important part, as I see it, is that LLVM already does constant folding and dead-code elimination. Meta-data might require more effort in the long run. > > --snip-- Less flexible for the
2017 Aug 03
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: [...] > >>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>+ unsigned int migratetype, struct page **page) > >This is just too ugly and wrong actually. Never provide struct page > >pointers
2017 Aug 03
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: [...] > >>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>+ unsigned int migratetype, struct page **page) > >This is just too ugly and wrong actually. Never provide struct page > >pointers
2009 Aug 24
8
overriding .blank? method
Hi, Does anyone know a way to override .blank? method that rails provides. I want to add additional custom checks (specific to my application) to this method. Thanks, Pratik
2015 Sep 29
1
ExecShield in C6 or C7 kernels?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:49:21AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Fred Smith > <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out if the stock kernels for Centos-6 and/or Centos-7 > > have ExecShield compiled in, and if so, if it is turned on by default. > > According to what I've read, Exec Shield is enabled
2017 Sep 20
1
[OT] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma
Straying OT ... > > On Tue, September 19, 2017 1:42 pm, Nux! wrote: > > > Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. > > > > It is not as much true about languages themselves (though it is true, and > > I for one call python "sneaky snake" just because of that ;-), as about > > <snip> > Yeah, in addition to
2014 Apr 14
2
HeartBleed in RHEL
I know I'm slightly OT here, asking about RHEL, but since Centos is now a part of RH, I'm hoping I won't be summarily ejected. I've seen several articles that listed Centos 6.x as vulnerable, but DID NOT LIST RHEL 6. I'd think that if Centos 6.x is vulnerable, then so would RHEL 6.x, since Centos is made from RHEL sources. Does anyone know for sure either way? thanks! --
2013 Oct 11
2
suddenly X gives black screen with small clock cursor
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:08:08PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > Gang: > > I'm puzzled... > > I rebooted a while ago (and in between the down and up, I installed Fedora > 20 Beta on a USB hard drive, making sure it wouldn't mess with my Centos > system). The install went fine, but afterwards, when I reboot Centos, it > comes up with a black screen and a clock as the
2011 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends
----- Original Message ----- > From: Nate Fries <nfries88 at yahoo.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com>; LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Cc: > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 6:52 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends > > Most JVMs perform terribly. Even Sun's has had notable performance
2017 Aug 03
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: > >[...] > >>>>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>>>+
2017 Aug 03
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: > >[...] > >>>>+static int report_free_page_block(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, > >>>>+
2007 May 20
2
Centos5, Compiz, and Nvidia
Hi! Just did a TEST install of centos5 on an old PIII box. one of the things I wanted to see was the fancy desktop eye-candy of compiz and/or beryl. This box has a nvidia 6600 series card, and I've isntalled the Nvidia drivers (download from nvidia and run their installer). I used the software updater to install compiz (didn't show up on original install, perhaps I didn't hold my
2017 Aug 03
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Thu 03-08-17 20:11:58, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 07:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>>>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: >
2017 Aug 03
2
[PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Thu 03-08-17 20:11:58, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/03/2017 07:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 03-08-17 19:27:19, Wei Wang wrote: > >>On 08/03/2017 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>On Thu 03-08-17 18:42:15, Wei Wang wrote: > >>>>On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>>>>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: >
1998 Nov 26
1
Saving memory usage -- .C(....., DUP = FALSE) danger?
...a a different object than 'y' anway? I know that I could make experiments and find out, but hopefully, one of you will know much better and explain to all R-develers. Really useful might be a comprehensive list of recommendations on when "DUP = FALSE" is useful / advisable / detestable ... Thank you! Martin Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum SOL G1; Sonneggstr.33 ETH (Federal Inst. Technology) 8092 Zurich SWITZERLAND phone: x-41-1-632-3408 fax: ...-1086 <>< -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...
2009 Jul 04
3
modern motherboard for centos-5
I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5. Though I'm partial to AMD processors, and would like to use one in my new configuration, that's not a requirement, if the most appropriate board happens to be intel-compatible. However, given the way ASUS is dumping LInux and crawling more firmly into bed with
2010 Apr 30
3
Announce: Lustre 1.8.3 is available!
Hi all, Lustre 1.8.3 is available on the Sun Download Center Site. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp Our forwarding link has not yet been updated but should be shortly, so you can either find your way in through: http://www.sun.com/downloads/index.jsp?tab=2#L and look for Lustre 1.8.3 near the bottom of the "L" section. or