search for: desupporting

That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. On January 8, 2016 5:18:36 PM EST, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: >> In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet >I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I >upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the

On 01/09/2016 11:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: >> That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. > > you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years > ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and > buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is an eternity > in the

On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: > That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is an eternity in the computer industry. whatever this 10 year old application is you're trying

That is correct, not only do I want to, I need to. Thank you for your explanation of the EPEL policy. On January 8, 2016 5:43:55 PM EST, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: >> That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. > >you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years >ago >which

Hi Fangrui, As you noted we are working on helping our NaCl users transition to WebAssembly and new web APIs that cover the functionality offered by NaCl. In terms of actually turning down the platform features, we recently announced a timeline at https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html. In terms of LLM, I would prefer to keep the support we have in the tree until

> On Apr 20, 2020, at 1:47 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > But the most recent NaCL toolchain release is based on LLVM 3.7 from 2015. > > Unless you're planning to upgrade the NaCL toolchain to use a new release based on LLVM devhead (which would seem a rather expensive thing to attempt now, given the plan to desupport it in a

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

...fics cases will fall below the average". This suggests that is not entirely out of the question for the attack to succeed within one minute. If that risk is not appropriate in one's environment, then other measures (which may include inetd/tcpserver but may also include desupporting use of SSH protocol 1.5) are needed. Matt Power BindView Corporation, RAZOR Team mhpower at bos.bindview.com