search for: desupport

That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. On January 8, 2016 5:18:36 PM EST, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: >> In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet >I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I >upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the

...ntirely, so be it. Do > note, Java applets running in web browsers are an almost entirely > deprecated technology as there's been a non-stop stream of security > problems with the whole java applet concept and implementation. > J2SE 1.4, a version that was new in 2002, was desupported in 2008. Just for your information I was working for a local ISP a few months ago, that uses microwave radio links to connect various hilltop radio access points and thus provide high speed internet access to rural clients in hard to reach terrain. Some of the kit used had a management interfa...

...clientside applet entirely, so be it. Do note, Java applets running in web browsers are an almost entirely deprecated technology as there's been a non-stop stream of security problems with the whole java applet concept and implementation. J2SE 1.4, a version that was new in 2002, was desupported in 2008. re; EPEL, as I understand, EPEL drops old versions like a rock the minute they are desupported. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

...ntirely, so be it. Do >note, Java applets running in web browsers are an almost entirely >deprecated technology as there's been a non-stop stream of security >problems with the whole java applet concept and implementation. >J2SE >1.4, a version that was new in 2002, was desupported in 2008. > >re; EPEL, as I understand, EPEL drops old versions like a rock the >minute they are desupported. > > >-- >john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >ht...

Hi Fangrui, As you noted we are working on helping our NaCl users transition to WebAssembly and new web APIs that cover the functionality offered by NaCl. In terms of actually turning down the platform features, we recently announced a timeline at https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html. In terms of LLM, I would prefer to keep the support we have in the tree until

...lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > But the most recent NaCL toolchain release is based on LLVM 3.7 from 2015. > > Unless you're planning to upgrade the NaCL toolchain to use a new release based on LLVM devhead (which would seem a rather expensive thing to attempt now, given the plan to desupport it in a year), I don't think keeping the code in LLVM is actually useful for anyone at this point. Right, I think this is the key issue. If the community cannot use the code that is in tree, there isn’t a strong reason for the community to maintain it. -Chris > > > On Mon, Apr 20...

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

...fics cases will fall below the average". This suggests that is not entirely out of the question for the attack to succeed within one minute. If that risk is not appropriate in one's environment, then other measures (which may include inetd/tcpserver but may also include desupporting use of SSH protocol 1.5) are needed. Matt Power BindView Corporation, RAZOR Team mhpower at bos.bindview.com