search for: destruction

I'd like to know if there's a way to non-destructively reverse L-R channels in an ogg vorbis file? I've been recording live classical sources, but until tonight haven't listened to them on anything with even approaching decent stereo separation. Well, you guessed it. Why the hell are the violins on the right and the brass on the left? Checked my equipment and sure enough, cable

playing with 'names<-', i observed the following: x = 1 names(x) # NULL 'names<-'(x, 'foo') # c(foo=1) names(x) # NULL where 'names<-' has a functional flavour (does not change x), but: x = 1:2 names(x) # NULL 'names<-'(x, 'foo') # c(foo=1, 2) names(x) # "foo" NA

Hi Ted, Doug said you might have a clang-based checker that would detect when people allocate memory with a BumpPtrAllocator and then construct a class into it that needs destruction. In killing valgrind-found memory leaks in LLVM, I've found several instances of this mistake. They often involve SmallVectors, which only show up as leaks in valgrind if they happen to overflow their static allocation, so it would be useful to also check this statically. Could you point me to...

I know that you should always use a POST to perform actions that are destructive. I intend to break this rule and use a GET, but before I do, I''d like to know if there is a better way of doing this:- I have an account edit form for the user to make changes to their profile. They have to be logged-in to do this. The problem is I have a file_column field within the form which is storing

Hello, For performance reasons, I would like to provide a way to skip construction/destruction of objects that are stack allocated. Typically, C-style arrays of std::complex create an initialization loops that is almost always unnecessary. I am thinking of providing an __attribute__((uninitialized)) that can be applied to an object declaration: { std::complex<float> foo[64][64] _...

When implementing EVT_PAINT handlers in c++ the PaintDC object is constructed at the beginning of the function, and auto destructed at it''s end, which informs wxwidgets that "invalid regions in the window have been repainted". Under ruby, this is not the case and causes a stream of EVT_PAINT events to be sent to the given window (until one of PaintDC objects is destructed by

...hides his agent status behind his condescending facade. What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here! Your on notice as of now and you're being watched. Don't try to destroy this community like the trail of destruction behind you! If you wanna play nice in the sandbox then okay, but most people know better than to trust you any farther than they can throw you already - This community and the associated technologies aren't subject to usurpation by the "Special Interest" groups that fund yo...

Hello!. How can i use @releaseDomain from dom0 to subscribe for domain destruction? I''m try to add watch for @releaseDomain path with token equal of needed domain id. But when another domain dies, i get domain that i provide via token to xs_watch. Is that possible to get id of domain what released from xenstore? -- Vasiliy Tolstov, Clodo.ru e-mail: v.tolstov@selfip.ru...

Reading through the Samba3 -By Example guide and I'm confused with the statement section 9.2 http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/ntmigration.html#id2594565 about accessing the SAM and Security sections of the registry will render the PDC non operable. Its clear from the text if you go and edit the registry(regedit etc..) so you can read the entries your PDC will not work.

"net rpc vampire ..." does NOT set the SAM or SECURITY hives of the registry to "readable", which is what renders the PDC non-operable. "net rpc vampire ..." is safe to use as many times as it takes to get comfortable with the process. I did it my self when I was converting our "labs" NT4 domain to Samba. --

...;A is destroyed after a variable time by some kind of garbage collector) Is this the normal behaviour, or it depends on our specific redirection? If C were a user instead, we noticed the same behaviour in the two cases (in both cases, the channel is immediately destroyed). We need the immediately destruction of the unused channel, to immediately reuse it to place another call. How can we make asterisk close immediately the unused channel after the redirection? Thanks a lot!

Hello, I got situation which is unclear for me, hope somebody could explain this. A calls to B INVITE sent from A to B B responds with 100 Trying B responds with 183 Progress After 10 seconds: Asterisk CLI: Scheduling destruction of SIP dialog '..' in 32000 ms (Method: INVITE) Asterisk sends CANCEL _instantly_ B responds with 200 OK and 487 Request Terminated Asterisk confirms 102 ACK CLI: Really destroying SIP dialog '..' Method: INVITE Call terminates Asterisk version 1.4.18.1 Total call duration: 11s T...

...sts on the existing TCP socket. Kamailio times out, and re-opens a new TCP socket when the next probe is due. This works again, and probing is successful, until Asterisk destroys the dialog again. I've configured Asterisk so that is replies with a 200 OK. Is there a way I can avoid the dialog destruction, and let Kamailio use the same TCP socket for whatever time is necessary, rather than about 30"? Is my Asterisk behaving as expected? What's your advice for this type of configuration? Thanks in advance, -- Giacomo Vacca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scr...

Having read through the proposal, I feel like I missing some of the background to understand the problem you're trying to solve. My mental model is that construction of an object creates a new abstract location in an infinite heap with each object infinitely far apart. Destruction of the object destroys the abstract location. As a result, destructing one object and constructing another produce unique incomparable abstract locations. The fact the two abstract locations might happen to share a physical address is irrelevant. If I'm understanding the proposal correctl...

...atic destructor? Wouldn't this be safer than relying on a client to call llvm_shutdown()? It seems like the whole purpose of llvm_shutdown() is to allow clients to free the data allocated by ManagedStatic instances. Could we not just give them an option, but by default clean up during global destruction? -- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130209/e9354c2e/attachment.html>

...Having read through the proposal, I feel like I missing some of the > background to understand the problem you're trying to solve. > > My mental model is that construction of an object creates a new abstract > location in an infinite heap with each object infinitely far apart. > Destruction of the object destroys the abstract location. As a result, > destructing one object and constructing another produce unique incomparable > abstract locations. The fact the two abstract locations might happen to > share a physical address is irrelevant. > > If I'm understanding...

...be safer than relying on a >> client to call llvm_shutdown()? It seems like the whole purpose of >> llvm_shutdown() is to allow clients to free the data allocated by >> ManagedStatic instances. Could we not just give them an option, but by >> default clean up during global destruction? >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Justin Holewinski >> > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Justin Holewinski > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing listLLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http:/...

Hey all, Quick question about handling completed workers... Most of my workers are one-offs that just let me spin off a long-running file transfer process and then they just need to self-destruct when completed. Thus, at the end of my do_work, I just call self.delete to (in theory) self-destruct. However, while checking the jobs.size from the console, I''ve noticed that this

...isplay:block;padding:0 10px;} #patch del {background:#fdd;text-decoration:none;display:block;padding:0 10px;} #patch .lines, .info {color:#888;background:#fff;} --></style> <title>[1029] trunk/wxruby2/swig/classes/MenuBar.i: Add special GC protection for Wx::Menu to prevent premature destruction</title> </head> <body> <div id="msg"> <dl> <dt>Revision</dt> <dd>1029</dd> <dt>Author</dt> <dd>brokentoy</dd> <dt>Date</dt> <dd>2007-05-22 04:20:06 -0400 (Tue, 22 May 2007)</dd> </dl&...

This patch adds 'module' member in the 'struct vsock_transport' in order to get/put the transport module. This prevents the module unloading while sockets are assigned to it. We increase the module refcnt when a socket is assigned to a transport, and we decrease the module refcnt when the socket is destructed. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>