Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "destrucion".
Did you mean:
destruction
2012 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] Crash using the JIT on x86 but work on x64
Skykill Skyoverside <skyoverside at live.fr> writes:
[snip]
My guess is that you are hitting a VS C++ ABI missing feature in
Clang. Ask in the Clang mailing list for a confirmation, but IIRC there
are still missing pieces on either object construction/destrucion,
parameter passing, returning classes and C++ exception support.
2012 Jul 08
1
[LLVMdev] Crash using the JIT on x86 but work on x64
...h using the JIT on x86 but work on x64
Skykill Skyoverside <skyoverside at live.fr> writes:
[snip]
My guess is that you are hitting a VS C++ ABI missing feature in
Clang. Ask in the Clang mailing list for a confirmation, but IIRC there
are still missing pieces on either object construction/destrucion,
parameter passing, returning classes and C++ exception support.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2012 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] Crash using the JIT on x86 but work on x64
Hi, so yes assertions are enabled by default in Debug from what i could see
in the CMakeLists.txt
if( uppercase_CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "RELEASE" )
option(LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS "Enable assertions" OFF)
else()
option(LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS "Enable assertions" ON)
endif()
Without assertions enabled, when i'm running the program without the
debugger, it