search for: despicable

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "despicable".

Did you mean: desirable
2009 Feb 25
4
switchtype QSIG and Asterisk implementation
...isk "fully QSIG-compliant"? I currently have an Alcatel 4400 connected to Asterisk 1.2 and 1.4. Zaptel versions are 1.2.26 and 1.4.11. I am using switchtype=euroisdn and all works fine. However, it seems that Alcatel's latest firmware has dropped support for euroisdn which is really despicable. So now I need to see if I can migrate to QSIG which is supported by Alcatel. However, I've searched for QSIG + Asterisk on the web and came up with some posts saying that Asterisk may not fully implement QSIG (eg.: http://threebit.net/mail-archive/asterisk-users/msg14000.html). Are the lates...
2003 Sep 24
1
Voicemail doesn't hangup
I'm running the a very recent CVS version of asterisk on an RH9 machine. My problem is that my x100p takes about 10 seconds to detect a hangup. After that it takes about 10 more seconds for the the zaptel device to release the line. Here's an example of my console report: == Parsing '/var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/default/101/INBOX/msg0000.txt': == Parsing
2005 Oct 03
3
Flac and OggFlac
HI all, I have already added FLAC support to libsndfile and I am now working on adding support for OggFLAC. I have a couple of question about things that seem radically different between regular FLAC and OggFLAC. 1) FLAC has a function: FLAC__seekable_stream_decoder_get_decode_position but there seems to be no corresponding function:
2000 Apr 12
4
For wishlist: sanity checks for subsets in lm, glm (PR#
Martyn Plummer <plummer@iarc.fr> writes: > On 12-Apr-00 Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote: > > Might be a good idea. Mind you, Splus 3.4 does exatly the same thing, > > and I'm a little worried that the uniqueness assumption might kill > > some bootstrapping applications: > > > > glm(y ~ x, data=test.data, subset=sample(seq(along=y),replace=T)) > > Splus
2011 May 02
5
Is there a difference ...?
Doh123, how is running a program off an NTFS partition asking for trouble? Ntfsprogs seems to handle it just fine. I know that NTFS doesn't let you mark a file as executable, and that the filesystem is susceptible to fragmentation, but you should just be able to tell it to run rather than display and be good. It shouldn't cause destruction. I think there might even be an NTFS defrag tool