search for: despatching

Dear developers: I have observed a change in the behaviour of S3 method despatch (as I guess related to namespaces) between 2.6.2 and yesterday's 2.7.0 RC and would be grateful if you could comment on that: the 'Axis' function in the 'graphics' namespace calls UseMethod("Axis",x), internally to despatch on the S3 Axis method depending on the type of the argument.

It is very wierd... Can some of you confirm the following behavior ? It is a new bug (feature ?) which was not yet in 0.49 ... noquote <- function(obj) { ## constructor for a useful "minor" class if(!inherits(obj,"noquote")) class(obj) <- c(class(obj),"noquote") obj } "[.noquote" <- function (x, subs) structure(unclass(x)[subs], class =

If I have a class Foo, then i can write an S3 method for sum for it: >setClass("Foo",representation(a="integer"));aFoo=new("Foo",a=c(1:3,NA)) >sum.Foo <- function(x,na.rm){print(x);print(na.rm);sum(x at a,na.rm=na.rm)} >sum(aFoo) But how do I write an S4 method for this? All my attempts to do so have foundered. For example

Following my previous post on S3 method despatch, I put debug messages in the code of Axis, Axis.default and plot.default in graphics/R/axis.R and graphics/R/plot.R to print the class of x, at and y on plot. After recompiling R, what I see is that x *lost* its class attribute (at least for classes not known to 'graphics') in Axis, called directly from plot.default and this could be the

Hi all, I'm seeking feedback (good, bad or indifferent) in regards to developing (further) a new class system for R, that uses encapsulated class definitions (i.e. the method definitions are literally inside the body of the class definition). A working (however very rough and poorly tested) system is available in my R package "oosp" with documentation in the vignette

Is plot(ts.object) equivalent to the S-Plus ts.plot ? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Konstantinos E. Vorloou | Tel: +44 (0)191 374 1821 Department of Economics & Finance | Fax: +44 (0)191 374 7289 University of Durham, | email: K.E.Vorloou at durham.ac.uk 23/26 Old Elvet, | or : vorlow at rocketmail.com

Hi List, Have an odd problem with the one-touch record on asterisk 1.2.11. All works ok, however one of our users today discovered if he is a bit slow hitting the 1 key after he presses *, the call seems to stay connected but its almost like it is muted. Haven't figured out the delay yet but it seems to be if the 1 is not pressed within 1-2 secs this occurs. Any suggestions? I tried

Following my posting of a write.table() function, Martin suggested that one could have a generic write() function and special methods for e.g. time series, data frames, etc. Well, a month has passed since ... What does everyone think? Is it a good idea, or would write.table() be enough? If we think that it is not enough, which arguments should the write methods typically allow? What about

Full_Name: Mike Kay Version: R-patched OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (137.75.70.37) Hi, The following patch cleans up some grammar in the docs for UseMethod (library/base/help/UseMethod) -mike --- UseMethod 2005-09-28 20:06:39.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/UseMethod 2005-10-31 21:21:05.534708720 +0000 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Description: R possesses a simple generic function mechanism

Hello everybody, regression tests do use `nc -U` since commit 0e4e955 to test for Unix domain socket forwarding. This fails on systems that have GNU netcat installed as that does not support Unix domain sockets. In fact it does not understand the `-U` option at all. What way to go there? -- main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"

Hi, Any suggestions to below problem? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jamie Heckford Sent: 17 October 2006 21:48 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] FW: Why does One-Touch record mute/disconnect callif not dialed quick enough? Hi List, Have an odd problem

Who has a ?green nose? and Send me from ?3.99 (30 Kg) delivers parcels all year ?! Fantastic 1st Parcel rates and even better subsequent - 1st Parcel (30 kg) from ?3.99. - 2nd Parcel and subsequent from ?2.99. - One hour delivery window with text notification - Unique Service Warranty (only available through Atom) - No residential surcharge -

First off I am totally annoyed and let down by PC World Business (PCWB part of the Dixons Group). I ordered one of these babies from them over a month ago. After constantly chasing them up they finally told me they couldn't deliver, and have now only just returned the money they "stole" from me. I only bought from them because they showed a 4-day availability stock level! Now

Dear List, I'm struggling with the signature writing cbind/rbind functions for a S4 class. First of all, I'm very happy that it is now possible to dispatch on ... I follow the example for "paste" in ?dotMethods, which works as far as this: ### start example setClass ("cbtest", representation = representation (data = "data.frame"),

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@r-project.org # ###################################################### 1. as.numeric behaves differently in R than in S and I think this shows a bug in how S3

> 3. I'm interested in the methodology for creating a fixed point > implementation and guaging how "good" it is relative to the floating > point golden standard My methodology at this stage is to get it working on the floating point DSP first and to gain recent experience in both Speex and the TI DSP range while I do so. Then I'll enter into serious discussions about

I've been following this kist for a while now and I suppose I had better introduce myself. This is going to be rather a long message, but that can't be avoided. My name is Andrew Baker and I work for a company called TeleDesign. We are based in the UK. http//www.teledesign.co.uk I have lots of experience with telecomms, a fair bit with VoIP, quite a bit (but rather less recent) with

Have you thought about making them agents, they would both be reachable by dialing there agent number then, and I know only one agent can be logged in at once. Just a thought. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 8:26 PM To: