search for: derailment

denver_users << yourself Sign up: http://groups.google.com/group/derailed -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:55 AM C Bergström <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Chandler - I do not want to derail, hijack or change the topic of this > discussion - Would you be ok with me going into specific examples? > IMO, no, I don't think that would be a productive direction. I also suspect it would have a high probability of (unintentionally) leading to exactly the

Andrew, I very much appreciate your swift reply and your expertise. I readily admit I'm a little out of my depth here. I'm sitting here in California at almost midnight with just the weekend to get done all I need to do on the network and I fear this may be derailing my plans. This article on the Samba Wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_IP_Address_of_a_Samba_AD_DC seems to

I''m trying to apply an Effect.Highlight only to elements of a Form that was submitted. So if a user updated 2 fields of a 10 field form, the Effect.Highlight would be applied to the 2 fields... showing the user what was updated. My first attempt was to use the :complete=>"eval(request.responseText)" ... however, the template that get''s rendered won''t know

On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On 2014 Jun 18, at 13:29, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >> Numerical analysis is hard. Every numerics expert I have ever worked with considers trying to re-invent floating point a cardinal sin of numerical analysis. Just don’t do it. You will miss

Am 05.05.2016 um 10:58 schrieb C Bergström via llvm-dev: > Sincerely and pragmatically - what do you think will be different > after this is in place.. Bureaucracy is great, but what's broken or > pandemic that you're trying to fix? From the last discussion, I gather that it's an attempt to prevent damage before it can happen. I'm quite sceptical about that. It's

> On May 6, 2019, at 10:14 AM, Bee.Lists <bee.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I will give 770 a try. > > Try 750 first. You don?t need write access to do what you?re asking. > > Also, the group membership change won?t take effect until you log out and > back in. Thanks to correct me, both things are true, if he only wants to read logs there, the 750 is

Hi all, I am trying to do fitting of large sets of timeseries data, and error messages derail the process when I encounter a dataset that doesn't fit. I'd like to ignore those "misfits" and try another equation or move to the next dataset. Any ideas? (piece of code below) Thanks, --Warren ##The code looks something like this: attach(zf) x <- hours

Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is deep in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to ask a simple question. I found this guide for SELinux: http://www.linux-books.us/centos_0005.php and it looks like it's straight out of RedHat. However, it's dated 2005. Will this be sufficient to help understand a CentOS 5 - or 6 - installation of

Hi, After updating to R-3.0 beta r62328, I get the following: > install.packages("Biobase", type="source", repos="http://george2/BBS/2.12/bioc") Error in do.call(op, list(v_c, v_t[[op]])) : could not find function "R (>=2.15.1)" The problem can be fixed by adding a space after >= in the offending package's DESCRIPTION file and re-generating

I am trying to install GOsa and it seems to need PHP 5.2 So I searched CentOS Plus but no luck So I downloaded the src RPM from Fedora 11 and tried to build but got derailed early on in the process with these errors... + cat /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 \ /usr/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4 \ /usr/share/aclocal/ltsugar.m4 \ /usr/share/aclocal/ltversion.m4 \ /usr/share/aclocal/lt~obsolete.m4

Thanks for driving this Renato. It going to be a huge benefit to everyone once we have a solution in place. > On Jul 20, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > When everyone is happy that we have enough proposals, Tanya's survey > should be brought forward, in which case I'll gladly offer my help > again. Regarding the

On 11/5/2015 10:30 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 05/11/15 15:18, James wrote: >> On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: >>> Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or >>> was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get >>> logged at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to >>> locate

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand via llvm-dev

On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote: > ... > It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue > w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. > CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots > of computers sold currently. > > That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and > nothing at

On 2018-08-22 05:56, John McCall via llvm-dev wrote: >> On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:20 PM, Leonard Chan <leonardchan at google.com> wrote: >> If we were to create a new type down the line, I think the main >> features that would distinguish them from other types are the >> arbitrary width and scale. Saturation can be handled through >> instructions since saturation

I moved a rails application to textdrive using their low-cost shared plan. Once on textdrive my app would display ''proxy errors'' periodically. Hitting reload seemed to be all that was needed to get past the proxy error. After discussions with their support people I decided the proxy errors were being caused by apache server restarts -- because there were many of us sharing one

Is anyone aware of what the status of the LLVM PGI Fortran front-end is? The last I've seen any information on this mailing list is about a year ago, and the original mailing list message suggested that it would be made public in late 2016. -- Joshua Cranmer Source code archæologist

I have produced RedHat 9.2.2-22 RPMS that include the ISC "delegate-only" patch that helps thwart Verisign''s wildcard .com and .net hijacking. These RPMs seem to run fine on RH9 (I''ve been running them since yesterday on ns1.shorewall.net). ftp://shorewall.net/pub/misc/ -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Eric Christopher via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Rafael, > > This is an unreasonable and unacceptable escalation of this thread. You have > been dismissive, derailing, and taking out of context everything Chandler, > and other long term active contributors have been asking and talking about. > Your tone has been