search for: deprecate_tcp_wrappers

...hen I tried a yum install to reinstall it, aeskulap was no longer present. This problem may also affect other modules. I have placed a bug report : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659667 The depracation of tcp wrappers may be involved in this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers -- Greg Ennis

...hen I tried a yum install to reinstall it, aeskulap was no longer present. This problem may also affect other modules. I have placed a bug report : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659667 The depracation of tcp wrappers may be involved in this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Everyone, As it turns out the problem was not related to the EPEL repo, but rather to the nux-dextop repo. I have contacted the maintainer of nex-dextop and he advised me that although aeskulap compiled on Ce...

On 09/12/2019 17:25, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> On 09/12/2019 17:20 Reio Remma via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hello! >> >> Are there any plans for an official Dovecot repo for CentOS 8? >> >> Thanks, >> Reio > (sorry for duplicate, user error in earlier one...) > > Yes. There are plans for the repo,

...hen I tried a yum install to reinstall it, aeskulap was no longer present. This problem may also affect other modules. I have placed a bug report : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659667 The depracation of tcp wrappers may be involved in this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Everyone, As it turns out the problem was not related to the EPEL repo, but rather to the nux-dextop repo. I have contacted the maintainer of nex-dextop and he advised me that although aeskulap compiled on Ce...

...wrappers and quota-devel. Managed to > rebuild by switching these off in the spec file (--without-libwrap), but > that's probably not a good idea. :) > > Reio TCP wrappers got dropped for RHEL 8 by purpose, following that step of fedora. https://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers There is no real need nowadays and from my experience not many admins make use of it. Alexander

...r later RHEL releases". > If the former, might it be reasonable for a user to change the 8's in > the code below to 9's? No, because there is no tcp_wrappers/tcp_wrappers-devel package in RHEL8 anymore. For reasons and alternatives, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers Best regards Gerald >>> We are looking into this, it was indeed removed from el7 by accident. RPM macros can be quite tricky sometimes. >> >> I have: >> >> %if 0%{?rhel} < 8 >> BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel >> %endif >> >> ... th...

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote: > On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too

...days; it's very pluggable but it normally works by adding firewall rules. Are there any similar popular systems left that rely on editing /etc/hosts.deny? Fedora dropped libwrap from sshd in 2018 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530163), and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers has some other options here (which would need to be adapted for Debian, but broadly similar approaches would work). SELinux ======= The fact that we build using --with-selinux has come up (https://cybervillains.com/@djm/112192735215160932). I haven't formed a complete opinion on this, but I...