search for: denigrating

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "denigrating".

Did you mean: deligating
2003 May 21
2
gnophone conf question
I hope this isn't something newbiesque and Steve will denigrate me. . . I just built gnophone, and I'm having trouble figuring out just how to sync the "Telephony Preferences" in gnophone and iax.conf on my asterisk server. I am heading on a trip and I'm pretty sure I'm going to be behind a NAT gateway, and my asterisk server is *separately* behind a NAT gateway. I
2012 Mar 09
3
uncompressed FLAC
What dbPowerAmp does is encapsulate the wav file into a FLAC container without actually compressing it. I guess it can be a bit arguable if you can technically call it a FLAC file :) It's like using "Store" mode in RAR, for instance. The idea behing this "uncompressed FLAC" is to give the FLAC tagging abilities to people who don't want to compress their files. But
2015 Feb 11
4
Another Fedora decision
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 16:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/10/2015 3:28 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > 3. The Russian's web site is that of a devote cyclist. > > oh, well, I'm glad that makes the copyright violation of stealing an > authors work OK in your book. Another bored expert desperate for a modicum of excitement ? You have absolutely no prima facie
2015 Feb 09
0
Another Fedora decision
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:28 -0800, Keith Keller wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> > >> on a site hosted in Russia which appears to be FULL of copyright violations. > On 2015-02-09, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > > Probably not really a software pirate but an individual (and a keen > >
2012 Mar 10
0
uncompressed FLAC
On 3/9/2012 at 3:56 PM Vladimiro Macedo wrote: |What dbPowerAmp does is encapsulate the wav file into a FLAC container |without actually compressing it. I guess it can be a bit arguable if you |can technically call it a FLAC file :) |It's like using "Store" mode in RAR, for instance. The idea behing this |"uncompressed FLAC" is to give the FLAC tagging abilities to
2014 Oct 31
0
Paul Albrecht
...thing. We are all only human, and sometimes we all make mistakes. The only way we can keep the project moving forward in the best manner possible is if we allow for disagreements and conversation. However, there is an acceptable way to disagree with each other, and an unacceptable way. Repeatedly denigrating others in the community, refusing to listen to their opinions and explanations, and continuing to attack those who disagree with you creates a hostile environment where productive conversation is impossible. Paul Albrecht repeatedly chose to communicate in this fashion and refused to change his beh...
2007 Sep 04
1
Microsoft RTAudio
Hello Monty: I'm OK with not continuing this on the Speex tech list. In fact, I've deliberately responded off list to the various posters. I do think, though, that your admonitions to be non political should go to both sides ... that Jean-Marc founded Speex doesn't give him license to denigrate other efforts. Thomas Leigh asked a perfectly legitimate question and Jean-Marc's
2007 Sep 04
2
Microsoft RTAudio
B. Mitchell Loebel wrote: > Hello LWATCDR: > > OK with me, but 1) I'm a Microsoft stockholder and 2) I'm not going to > stand still for people trashing Capitalist successes!! 'Nuff said. How about if I sell you a copy of speex. Buy low, sell high seems like a good capitalist plan, and then you could feel good about using Speex! Ben -- Ben Greear
2015 Feb 11
0
Another Fedora decision
On Tue, February 10, 2015 6:58 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 16:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 2/10/2015 3:28 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> > 3. The Russian's web site is that of a devote cyclist. >> >> oh, well, I'm glad that makes the copyright violation of stealing an >> authors work OK in your book. > > Another
2005 Mar 11
0
[LLVMdev] Anyone seen this before?
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Andrew Lenharth wrote: >> >>> yes, so this happens on anything that uses a struct for va_list (like >>> alpha). I am currently working on fixing this. if you look at the last >>> patch to the alpha portion of llvm-gcc, you can see a quick hack to work
2015 May 20
0
Probably a "bug" in the dendextend package
...> With regards, > Tal > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ^^^^^^^^^^ hmm... ... after all that: Your dendextend *is* a nice package, Tal, and so "best regards!", but as I've said before on this topic: In real life, be very careful before denigrating a child to its mother or father... so calling a something a bug in R which is none, is evoking feelings among R's parents .. ;-) Martin
2012 Mar 10
2
uncompressed FLAC
Mike, I went looking for that article and stumbled upon this gem. http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=103168 Enjoy. On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Mike. <the.lists at mgm51.com> wrote: > > > On 3/9/2012 at 3:56 PM Vladimiro Macedo wrote: > > |What dbPowerAmp does is encapsulate the wav file into a FLAC container > > |without actually compressing it. I guess
2011 Dec 04
2
let's get this established, one way or the other, once and for all
seumas said: > What confuses me is what > this all has to do with markdown. david said: > I find discussion of techniques for > building Markdown parsers very interesting. i can justify myself. indeed, it's a good exercise every so often, just to ensure that your position and directionality are focused. but it's not right, or fair, that every month, someone
2005 Apr 11
8
Building R packages under Windows.
Hello, My question is the following. Has anyone put together an "idiots" checklist of the steps needed to build a (small personal) package under Windows, or documented their own experiences of building packages under Windows? I ask this as last week there were some very interesting comments regarding the advantages of putting personally written functions together as a package
2004 Oct 10
3
R 2.0.0 not suffisantly reliable to be be used
After wasting one whole day, I've finally decided to stay with 1.9.1, some problems have been reported to R-Bugs. For occasional users, I would say, there's no worst thing than that: you installed the new release, and soem of your existing codes no longer work ! -- Fan
2015 May 18
2
A "bug" in plot.dendrogram - can't plot lty with character color
The problem: =========== Once a dendrogram has a branch with both a line type AND a color (which is a character color), the plot.dendrogram function will not plot and return an error. I say this is a bug because (I believe), we would like a dendrogram to be able to use character colors, while also allowing control over line types. This e-mail includes an example, and what I think a solution
2015 Feb 09
4
Another Fedora decision
On 2015-02-09, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> > The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> > shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >> > Information on other
2012 May 02
5
editing bind (DNS) configuration under CentOS 6
Hello listmates, It appears that system-config-bind has been phased out. Whatever the reasoning was behind that decision - what are we expected to do now? Edit it manually? That is doable, of course, but kind of cumbersome. Does anybody know if there is a tool we are expected to use for that purpose? Thanks. Boris.
2006 Apr 26
10
Rails Document must be more detailed otherwise...
In java/c++ the method signature provide a good details on which parameters the method accept, but in rails the ability to send hash as parameters make it impossible to know which parameters can be send. This ability make the rails API doc a must to be full of details and not supply partial examples of usage. When for example I see *link_to_remote*(name, options = {}, html_options = {}) I would
2005 Mar 11
3
[LLVMdev] Anyone seen this before?
So, I'm trying to build everything from source for the Debian package for LLVM, including the C/C++ front end. I'm running this build on LLVM 1.4 source (the released tarball), using Debian unstable (gcc 3.3.5, on a 2.6.8 kernel, on an x86_64 box, dual CPU). Before I get _too_ deep into it, I thought I would ask if the following compilation failure on the CFE looks the least bit familiar