Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "delibrately".
Did you mean:
deliberately
2005 Sep 22
2
accessing source code in R packages
Hi,
I am new the R world and would like to know how can I access source codes of
standard functions in R?
Thanks,
Ritesh.
2008 Nov 24
10
[PATCH] Dom0 Kernel - Fixes for saving/restoring MSI/MSI-X across Dom0 S3
Hi, Keir,
This patch is a bugfix for saving and restoring MSI/MSI-X across S3. Currently, Dom0''s PCI layer unmaps MSI when S3 and maps them back when resuming. However, this triggers unexpected behaviors. For example, if the drivers still holds that irq at the point of unmapping MSI, Xen will force unbind that pirq. But after resume, we have no mechanism to rebind that pirq. The device
2004 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfile or directory
Yes, it should find windows.h with the default configuration. But you
have to be suspicious of beta code that Microsoft gives out for free.
It might just be very buggy, or it might be deliberately crippled.
Considering the price tag on Visual Studio, it's one or the other (and
probably both).
Out of curiosity, did it accept the solution and project files as is, or
did it want to
2004 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfile or directory
----Original Message Follows----
From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org>
Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List
<llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No
suchfile or directory
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:29:47 -0800
2004 Dec 23
3
[LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfileor directory
...;just be very buggy, or it might be >deliberately crippled. Considering the
>price tag on Visual Studio, it's one or the other (and >probably both).
For a month ago I was at a .NET seminar hosted by MS and the spokesman said,
you should be cautios with beta software. They don't delibrately cribble the
software, but sometimes, depending on the scope of the build, known errors
e.t.c., they disable known buggy or other functionality.
And I did take it that way.
>Out of curiosity, did it accept the solution and project files as is, or
>did it want to "upgrade" >th...