search for: decouples

Hi! (a complete newby, but will not give up easily!) I was wondering if there is any way to decouple the axis and tick mark widths? As I understand they are both controlled by the lwd setting, and cannot be controlled independently? For example I might want to create major and minor ticks, which I now know how to do by superimposing two axes with different at settings, but what if I also wanted

Hi, So, SMACK is a software verifier based around LLVM, and you can find more info (PDF, title, abstract) about our recent publication here: http://soarlab.org/2014/05/smack-decoupling-source-language-details-from-verifier-implementations/ I would appreciate if you could add it to your list of LLVM-based publications. Thanks! Best, -- Zvonimir -- http://zvonimir.info http://soarlab.org/

Hello, I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. Any ideas would be appreciated. Best, Anadi. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

You can take unoptimized bitcode and run it through ‘opt’ to have complete flexibility in which passes get run. It may take some fiddling to find out the pass sequence and ordering that does what you want, as some passes rely on previous passes to canonicaplize code into a form it can effectively work with. -Jim On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote:

Allow changes in static matrices to not break/disrupt code in OpusProjection* APIs. + Minor bug/typo fixes. This patch depends on [PATCH] "Ensure mapping matrix size is always valid." Cheers, Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20171205/3fbd2af1/attachment.html> -------------- next

Hi Anadi, In the file PassManagerBuilder.cpp you can change the lines below to get rid of the O3 restriction. 189 if (LoopVectorize && OptLevel > 2) 190 MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass()); Nadav On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple

In the Rails Recipes book the recipe "Keeping track of who did what" explains how to do decoupled observing of models. In my application I''d like to do a similar thing but watching the controllers. For example, when somebody hits the login method of the Security controller, I''d like to make a note of it. In this case I could observe the User model and watch for

Dear R colleagues, I am trying to plot some geophysical data as a filled contour on a continent map and so far the guidance from the R-help archives has been invaluable. The only bit that still eludes me is the colour key (legend) coming with filled.contour: I prefer to generate my own colour palette, mainly based on the quantiles of tenths of the data in order to capture the whole range (of

Thanks for the suggestion Jim. I already tried to do it by 'opt' but it also requires O3. BTW I think that if I invoke 'opt' with '-vectorize-loops' option, it will figure out the passes required for LV since every pass mentions what other passes are prerequisite. Am I correct? Best, Anadi. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com>

Hi! I'm writing my own project in LLVM and I came across a document describing Decoupled software pipelining algorithm written in LLVM by The Liberty Research Group for their VELOCITY C++ compiler: http://liberty.princeton.edu/Research/DSWP/ http://liberty.princeton.edu/Publications/micro38_dswp.pdf and some of spectacular results: http://liberty.princeton.edu/videos/gimp.php

Hello, below is the first draft of my proposal for GSoC. Any comments/advices are apreciated. # Implement Decoupled Software Pipeline (DSWP) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The goal of this project is to implement the automatic parallelization technique

Hi Anadi, Yes, this is a bug in the loop vectorizer. The loop vectorizer expects only one loop counter (integer with step=1). There is no reason why we should not handle the case below, and it should be easy to fix. Interestingly enough if you reverse the order of iterations and count from SIZE to zero, the loop vectorizer would vectorize it. If you open a bugzilla report and assign it to me

Hi Nadav, I tried your suggestion by changing the condition to : 189 if (LoopVectorize && OptLevel >= 0) 190 MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass()); and compiled. Then I used the following command: opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -vectorize-loops -vectorizer-min-trip-count=6 -debug-only=loop-vectorize -O1-S -o example1_vect.s example1.s where example1.s is IR generated by clang -S

Dear All, I am glad to be part of GSoC 2016 with LLVM organization. I am a first year PhD student at IIT Hyderabad, India and my research area is compiler optimizations using polyhedral model. My GSoC 2016 project is to implement Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM [1]. We have a discussion on Polly-dev mailing list [2] on taking a better approach to implement this project. Based upon this

From: Nathaniel Gray <n8gray@gmail.com> Date: Sep 14, 2005 11:30 AM Subject: Newbie q: decoupling vorbis from ogg To: vorbis-dev@lists.xiph.org Hi, Sorry if this is a newbie question. I'm trying to write an OS X AudioCodec for Vorbis using libvorbis. I'm confused about the libvorbis dependency on libogg. I thought the vorbis spec didn't require ogg as the container, but the

The jazzdma ops implement support for a very basic IOMMU. Thus we really should not use the dma-direct code that takes physical address limits into account. This survived through the great MIPS DMA ops cleanup mostly because I was lazy, but now it is time to fully split the implementations. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- arch/mips/jazz/jazzdma.c | 32

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Do not assume that the Python plugin of nbdkit has the same name of the > Python interpreter. > > Use the default upstream name of nbdkit to identify it; downstream > distributions must adjust this variable, in case they rename the Python > plugin of nbdkit. I'm not saying this is wrong, but it does break

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:41:17PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > One option I see is to export, as part of the nbdkit Python module > interface, the equivalent of sys.version_info: this way, the scripts > can detect which python version is the plugin linked with: nbdkit >= 1.8 exports the Python version in ‘--dump-plugin’ output: $ nbdkit python --dump-plugin ... python_version=2.7.15

On 07/26/2018 04:48 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > <preamble> > I have deployed Linux/Apache/PHP (node1) + MySQL (node2) with Security > Groups (AWS) or iptables controlling who can connect to the MySQL > server. In topology terms -- a 2 Tier architecture. In AWS - one > can deploy several such instances behind a ELB. Each LAP instance > talks to a MySQL RDS. The LAP instances

Hi Ted, On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 06:59 -0800, Ted Kremenek wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to separate the Support, System, ADT and Config header > > files > > into the support module, per previous plans. However, APFloat.h is not > > self-contained: > > > > APFloat.h:105:43: error: