search for: decouple

Hi! (a complete newby, but will not give up easily!) I was wondering if there is any way to decouple the axis and tick mark widths? As I understand they are both controlled by the lwd setting, and cannot be controlled independently? For example I might want to create major and minor ticks, which I now know how to do by superimposing two axes with different at settings, but what if I also wanted th...

Hi, So, SMACK is a software verifier based around LLVM, and you can find more info (PDF, title, abstract) about our recent publication here: http://soarlab.org/2014/05/smack-decoupling-source-language-details-from-verifier-implementations/ I would appreciate if you could add it to your list of LLVM-based publications. Thanks! Best, -- Zvonimir -- http://zvonimir.info http://soarlab.org/

Hello, I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. Any ideas would be appreciated. Best, Anadi. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was s...

...t does what you want, as some passes rely on previous passes to canonicaplize code into a form it can effectively work with. -Jim On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > Best, > Anadi. > __________________________________...

...ze is always valid." Cheers, Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20171205/3fbd2af1/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Decouple-OpusProjection-API-from-static-matrices.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 8424 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20171205/3fbd2af1/attachment.bin>

...the O3 restriction. 189 if (LoopVectorize && OptLevel > 2) 190 MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass()); Nadav On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > Best, > Anadi. > __________________________________...

In the Rails Recipes book the recipe "Keeping track of who did what" explains how to do decoupled observing of models. In my application I''d like to do a similar thing but watching the controllers. For example, when somebody hits the login method of the Security controller, I''d like to make a note of it. In this case I could observe the User model and watch for authenti...

...antile values). I tried to modify the key.axes=axis(..) to force an evenly spaced colour key (and keeping the same colours) but it seems that this ultimately obeys the 'levels' and 'col' parameters already defined, which are also used for the main image. I have also tried to "decouple" the 'levels' and 'col' settings between the main plot and the legend by fiddling with the filled.contour function but without success yet. I would be grateful for any ideas, ideally based on the basic graphics package. Thanks, Panos --------------------------------------...

...s rely > on previous passes to canonicaplize code into a form it can effectively > work with. > > -Jim > > > On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it > from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I > want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 > mostly optimises away the loop body. > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > Best, > Anadi. > _____________________...

Hi! I'm writing my own project in LLVM and I came across a document describing Decoupled software pipelining algorithm written in LLVM by The Liberty Research Group for their VELOCITY C++ compiler: http://liberty.princeton.edu/Research/DSWP/ http://liberty.princeton.edu/Publications/micro38_dswp.pdf and some of spectacular results: http://liberty.princeton.edu/videos/gimp.php http://...

Hello, below is the first draft of my proposal for GSoC. Any comments/advices are apreciated. # Implement Decoupled Software Pipeline (DSWP) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The goal of this project is to implement the automatic parallelization technique called Decoupled S...

...MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass()); >> >> Nadav >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. >> >> Any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Best, >> Anadi. >> __________...

...opVectorize && OptLevel > 2) > 190 MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass()); > > Nadav > > > > > On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > Best, > Anadi. > ____________________________________...

...l model. My GSoC 2016 project is to implement Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM [1]. We have a discussion on Polly-dev mailing list [2] on taking a better approach to implement this project. Based upon this discussion, I am planning to cover the following items in the first month of this GSoC. 1: Decouple ScopInfo object from pass and create two passes. One region pass to preserve compatibility with existing Polly transformation passes, other will be a function pass to be used by PolyhedralInfo pass as mentioned below. 2: Decouple DependenceInfo object from pass and create two passes. Same as above...

From: Nathaniel Gray <n8gray@gmail.com> Date: Sep 14, 2005 11:30 AM Subject: Newbie q: decoupling vorbis from ogg To: vorbis-dev@lists.xiph.org Hi, Sorry if this is a newbie question. I'm trying to write an OS X AudioCodec for Vorbis using libvorbis. I'm confused about the libvorbis dependency on libogg. I thought the vorbis spec didn't require ogg as the container, but the

The jazzdma ops implement support for a very basic IOMMU. Thus we really should not use the dma-direct code that takes physical address limits into account. This survived through the great MIPS DMA ops cleanup mostly because I was lazy, but now it is time to fully split the implementations. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- arch/mips/jazz/jazzdma.c | 32

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Do not assume that the Python plugin of nbdkit has the same name of the > Python interpreter. > > Use the default upstream name of nbdkit to identify it; downstream > distributions must adjust this variable, in case they rename the Python > plugin of nbdkit. I'm not saying this is wrong, but it does break

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:41:17PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > One option I see is to export, as part of the nbdkit Python module > interface, the equivalent of sys.version_info: this way, the scripts > can detect which python version is the plugin linked with: nbdkit >= 1.8 exports the Python version in ‘--dump-plugin’ output: $ nbdkit python --dump-plugin ... python_version=2.7.15

On 07/26/2018 04:48 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > <preamble> > I have deployed Linux/Apache/PHP (node1) + MySQL (node2) with Security > Groups (AWS) or iptables controlling who can connect to the MySQL > server. In topology terms -- a 2 Tier architecture. In AWS - one > can deploy several such instances behind a ELB. Each LAP instance > talks to a MySQL RDS. The LAP instances

...sses in APFloat.h: > > Serializer; > Deserializer; Okay, but I imagine that leaves it still being used in APFloat.cpp which is also trying to be segregated to the support module. > > If this doesn't seem like a clean enough solution, there are other > ways to potentially decouple APFloat more from the Serialization > "library." The tradeoff is that it would require some code rewriting/ > addition, and could potentially make deserialization of APFloats (as > done in the new C frontend) slightly less efficient. I doubt the light performance loss will...