Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "decorate_cod".
Did you mean:
decorate_code
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and
while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD
check issues a warning for it. (See below.)
Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd
grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not.
Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically?
Thanks, Gabor
In
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...> Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically?
>
> That looks like a bug in the check code, but wouldn't it be possible to
> work around it with something like this?
>
> \examples{
> \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code('
> CODE
> ')}
> }
Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside
\examples, either:
checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block
G.
[...]
2018 Jul 12
0
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically?
>>
>> That looks like a bug in the check code, but wouldn't it be possible to
>> work around it with something like this?
>>
>> \examples{
>> \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code('
>> CODE
>> ')}
>> }
>
> Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside
> \examples, either:
>
> checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block
>
> G.
I think I found the bug. T...