search for: decorate_code

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "decorate_code".

2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD check issues a warning for it. (See below.) Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not. Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically? Thanks, Gabor In
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...> Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically? > > That looks like a bug in the check code, but wouldn't it be possible to > work around it with something like this? > > \examples{ > \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code(' > CODE > ')} > } Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside \examples, either: checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block G. [...]
2018 Jul 12
0
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically? >> >> That looks like a bug in the check code, but wouldn't it be possible to >> work around it with something like this? >> >> \examples{ >> \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code(' >> CODE >> ')} >> } > > Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside > \examples, either: > > checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block > > G. I think I found the bug. Th...