search for: decommissioning

There are ''official'' plan (by Samba Team, but also by Microsoft) to officially ''decommission'' support for NT-like domains? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)

Hello all, I have a Samba file server running that is member of a windows AD domain. Later I added 2 more domains with a full trust relationship between all 3. (all are Windows AD) Everything works perfectly, wbinfo -u/-g shows all users/groups from all 3 domains, and ACLs work perfectly. I now want to decommission 2 of the domains, and leave only 1 domain. Lets say they are: domain1old

I'm trying to decommission our PDC which is running on some older hardware and migrate it's functionality to one of our two currently operating BDCs for the domain. The three servers have nearly identical configurations with only differences in file and printer shares and a couple attributes like "wins support" and "domain master". They all have identical netlogon

Hi Rowland, On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:20:56 +0400 > henri transfert via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I've planned to upgrade a Samba DC from 4.6.7 to 4.9.4 . > > STOP! > > Do not do this directly, reports on here have shown that this will not > work. > > You

Does anyone know if there is a way to setup a Samba server to respond to 2 different names on the same or different IP addresses? I currently have two servers with two different names. I would like to decommission the first server while still allowing users to access the second server with the same name they were using to access the first server. Thank You, Jason Williard E-MAIL

Hi All, I'm trying to find a software package to do the following sip proxy work: I've an A*k server A that needs to be decommissioned, from the USA, and replaced by server B, in the UK. Both servers are on public internet IPs. Whilst the client migration happens, I want to divert all the Register traffic from Server A to Server B to catch any clients still left out there.

Hi, We added more g729 licenses today that we bought from digium on Friday. Since we had previously installed their licenses and had them running we just ran the register command along with the new key that was given to us. After we restarted asterisk NONE of the g729's worked even though if we do a show g729 it shows the new correct total licenses. In the licenses folder we see both license

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and > 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need > more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake) Hi Sylvestre, Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?

Hi All, After reading the list for a while I have a question myself. I have the task of upgrading a couple of systems and one of them is the office AD infrastructure from a Samba-4.1 installation to the latest stable version. I already did a concept of proof by incrementally compiling versions 4.2/3/4/5/etc to the then latest stable 4.10 and it seemed to work out OK but was a lot of work. I had a

Hi, In reading https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Joining_the_Active_Directory_as_a_Domain_Controller it says "If the other DCs are Samba DCs and were provisioned with --use-rfc2307, you Should add --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' to the join command" So does this mean that rfc2307 should not be used if the other DCs are MS

A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network for another six months, as it hosts a vertical application key to the business and used every day by some...

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 > >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it >

Hi guys, I have sernet-samba-client-4.1.21-11.el6.x86_64 with 5 DC's running in AD mode and I need to look at upgrading them to the latest source version of Samba with AD support. All servers are running Centos 6.x and the same Samba release. I see the Wiki mentions "Upgrade A DC and join it to the domain again" however I'm not sure in terms of upgrading how this process will

I have a simple setup: gluster> volume info Volume Name: myvolume Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 10.2.218.188:/srv Brick2: 10.116.245.136:/srv Brick3: 10.206.38.103:/srv Brick4: 10.114.41.53:/srv Brick5: 10.68.73.41:/srv Brick6: 10.204.129.91:/srv I *killed* Brick #4 (kill -9 and then shut down instance). My

It's been well over a year since I tried doing this and, at that time, it was not a simple install. File replication didn't seem to work, some accounts didn't show up in the new server, and the internal DNS seemed a bit problematic. The goal was to decommission a 2003 AD server (2003 level) and replace it with Samba4. Exchange 2000 exists in this domain but not much else. I have

Hi, I have a client that is in the process of decommissioning a SBS 2008 server. They have moved email off of the server and shutdown Exchange. They would like to switch to a samba AD DC and separate file server. According to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory I should be able to add a Samba DC to the domain b...

.. we setup 2 new DCs replacing older DCs and joined them to the domain, then decommissioned the old DCs. I now discover that I cannot edit the GPO objects anymore. "sysvolcheck" shows no errors. I read through some documentation but it sounds outdated to me. Any hints where I would start looking? Who should normally be the owner of the sysvol directory itself? What I find strange

The machine at et.redhat.com is going to be decommissioned soon, and so I have arranged alternate hosting for these two git repositories. As of now you should use: http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=summary (web interface) git clone git://git.annexia.org/git/febootstrap.git http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=summary (web interface) git clone

Hi, I'm new to this list so please do not flame me if this is not an appropriate question. I would like to migrate from an old Server running Samba 2.2.7a as Domain controller to a new one running version 3.0.14a. The new server (with a new hostname) should be the DC in the future as the old server is to be decommissioned. Now I am looking a good HOWTO or similar document describing

I'm looking for confirmation that what I am about to do will work. My intent is to decommission the existing Samba PDC hardware and put in its place the new hardware. I intend on having the users see no difference, in terms of what they have/had and will continue to have available. Right now I will be copying everything from the /etc/samba directory into the same on the new server, moving