search for: decited

Hi Rowland, Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I > have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original > page back to the unison way of doing things. > > I will also discuss the unison page with Louis Van Belle, I believe he > is still using this method and may have

Hey everyone Have a (relatively) old CentOS SAMBA4 Active Directory running version 4.2.2, time to upgrade to the latest in the 4.2 series. As it's running as a VM on ESXI I have it backed up by VEEAM and I can take a snapshot before making any changes. Any major items to be aware of before upgrading to 4.2.13? Any reason I should not perhaps be looking a bit further to the 4.4.x

Hi all,   Renaming the admin account in Windows server context is a popular measure to make the network more safe.  Can we do this also in Samba 4? Are there any negative consequences?   Met Vriendelijke Groet, Kind Regards, Salutations,     Bart Coninckx Bits 'n Tricks BVBA   Hoge Mierdse Heide 182 2360 Oud-Turnhout tel. +32 14 480 820 gsm +32 478 88 33 08 info at bitsandtricks.com

>Sure you can rename it. Being a member of the right groups decite what >an account can do. >However, I don't understand how renaming the admin account improves the >security. For example, every domain user can easily find out who is a >member of the "Domain Admins" group: >> dsquery group -name "Domain Admins" | dsget group -members

Hi, I have been headbanging with asterisk and Jack for a while, decited to ask other linuxists for an advice. The problem is that Jack is compiled from source (0.118) in /usr/local/, but menuselect says "XXX" for it (cannot enable it). I need jack... Otherwise I will inotify Monitor WAVs, what is bad :`( After installing jack from sources: Add system-wide P...

Am 21.02.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do you > see? It simply works! _My_ personal disadvantage with idmap_rid is, that you have to define stuff like the shell on a per server and not on a per user base. You can decite if _all_ users should have /bin/bash or alle /bin/false. RFC2307 allows you to centralized set

On 2016-08-26 11:13, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I >> have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original >> page back to the unison way of doing things. >> >> I will also discuss

I've reading this lists few months. We are small company, that makes some system intregration, development and deployments in VoIP scene. Completely under linux. Today i have 6 machines with asterisk, huge test base - including devices like AS5350, Audiocodes gateways, ATAs, IP phones ... Now is time to make a decition for including * in our future projects. Main goal for us is the Stability.

> > Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do

Le 04/05/2017 à 10:01, Rowland Penny a écrit : > On Thu, 4 May 2017 09:39:17 +0200 > Arnaud FLORENT <aflorent at iris-tech.fr> wrote: > >> >> Le 04/05/2017 à 09:36, Rowland Penny a écrit : >>> On Thu, 4 May 2017 09:07:11 +0200 >>> Arnaud FLORENT <aflorent at iris-tech.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 04/05/2017 à 08:45, Rowland Penny

On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being used for this replication anymore. As the instructions there actually use "Osync" then the word "UNISON" should probably need to be replaced with "OSYNC". (I looked

Hi, I have some Ubuntu LTS servers running openssh server authenticating to external openldap. I installed a new Ubuntu LTS server with Samba4 to create a domain and is working very well. I managed to make a pfsense firewall authenticate users in this Samba4 ldap. How to make openssh in Ubuntu authenticate users in Samba4 ldap?

Was just browsing web and tried to save some files on a samba share and got: permission denied 3 times in a row... (and now on 4th try, it worked). The log for the past hour looks a bit odd... why so many module reloads? wouldn't they load once? Also I've never seen the "New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources." Why would I get so many session

The first time I installed xen there were two kernels, this time with 3.0.2, there is only one kernel, everything works. I can boot my dom0 and my domU''s using this one kernel but if I want to build a custom kernel for my domU''s but I am not sure from what I read on how to go about it. Will I end up with a new kernel other than my single kernel? Should I do the kernel config in

Hi everyone, I have a licencing question : do one need to buy CAL for every user in a Samba4 domain when there is a Windows Server as a domain member, knowing that the Windows server will be accessed using SMB by Windows workstations? As per http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch01.html and many other web sites, one of the main advantage of samba is that no user CALs are required. And I

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++