Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "dececco".
Did you mean:
cecco
2010 Dec 06
3
[LLVMdev] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
...eads execution (probably different chains for different
threads).
To complete the project, let's add a library of DSP operators, a
reasonable high level API to use it, and documentation to help the DSP
application designer (i find the LLVM learning curve quite steep :).
Contact maurizio at dececco.name if you are interest in setting up such a
project; if enough developers with the right skills and enough interest
are found I'll set up a project mailing list to further discuss the subject.
Cordially,
Maurizio
__________
Maurizio De Cecco -
Music: http://www.myspace.com/maurizio...
2010 Jan 26
3
[LLVMdev] Evaluatin llvm for an application
Hallo,
i am evaluating the possibility of using llvm for an application,
and i wondering if this is the right place where to pose questions.
I haven't found a llvm users mailing list ...
Maurizio De Cecco
2010 Dec 06
1
[LLVMdev] [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote:
> I have been looking for a while to LLVM as a possible technology to build a
> DSP execution engine, providing the runtime flexibility needed by real-time
> interactive DSP applications (like patcher languages), or by plug-in based
> processors, and in the same moment...
2010 Jan 26
0
[LLVMdev] Evaluatin llvm for an application
Yeah, this is the right place, just ask :)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> i am evaluating the possibility of using llvm for an application,
> and i wondering if this is the right place where to pose questions.
> I haven't found a llvm users mailing list ...
>
> Maurizio De Cecco
2010 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
Hi, and thanks for the feedback.
>My own gut feeling on this is that you'd be better off figuring out
>how to do this in the context of Faust, which already does a important
>subset of what you are describing, though notably without (I think)
>the LLVM part.
Surely a contribution to the discussion by the Faust people would
be welcome; and even more than to the discussion :->.