search for: cecco

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "cecco".

Did you mean: lecco
2010 Jan 26
3
[LLVMdev] Evaluatin llvm for an application
Hallo, i am evaluating the possibility of using llvm for an application, and i wondering if this is the right place where to pose questions. I haven't found a llvm users mailing list ... Maurizio De Cecco
2010 Jan 26
0
[LLVMdev] Evaluatin llvm for an application
Yeah, this is the right place, just ask :) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote: > Hallo, > > i am evaluating the possibility of using llvm for an application, > and i wondering if this is the right place where to pose questions. > I haven't found a llvm users mailing list ... > > Maurizio De Cecco
2010 Dec 06
1
[LLVMdev] [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote: > I have been looking for a while to  LLVM as a possible technology to build a > DSP execution engine, providing the runtime flexibility needed by real-time > interactive DSP applications (like patcher languages), or by plug-in based > processors, and...
2010 Dec 06
3
[LLVMdev] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
...ds execution (probably different chains for different threads). To complete the project, let's add a library of DSP operators, a reasonable high level API to use it, and documentation to help the DSP application designer (i find the LLVM learning curve quite steep :). Contact maurizio at dececco.name if you are interest in setting up such a project; if enough developers with the right skills and enough interest are found I'll set up a project mailing list to further discuss the subject. Cordially, Maurizio __________ Maurizio De Cecco - Music: http://www.myspace.com/maurizio...
2010 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
Hi, and thanks for the feedback. >My own gut feeling on this is that you'd be better off figuring out >how to do this in the context of Faust, which already does a important >subset of what you are describing, though notably without (I think) >the LLVM part. Surely a contribution to the discussion by the Faust people would be welcome; and even more than to the discussion :->.