search for: debdiff

...arguments. I expect some minor adjustments to?debian/patches/config-prefix.diff will also be required. An early version of that (based on the not-yet-upstream version of the patch) is in pkg-xen.git#feature/bug805508, I don't imagine the final result will look much different. I'll post a debdiff here as well as updating that branch. Ian.

...ustments to?debian/patches/config-prefix.diff will also be > required. > > An early version of that (based on the not-yet-upstream version of the > patch) is in pkg-xen.git#feature/bug805508, I don't imagine the final > result will look much different. > > I'll post a debdiff here as well as updating that branch. Now uploaded to delayed/5 (per-devref 5.11.2 since this is an important bug, and I'm pretty sure it is actually RC but 2 days seemed too aggressive). Attached are full.debdiff and sanitized.debdiff, the latter removes the noise from the automatic files (d...

...214"): > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:59:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Should I put jessie-security in the debian/changelog and dgit push it > > (ie, from many people's pov, dput it) ? > > Yes, the distribution line should be jessie-security, but please send > a debdiff to team at security.debian.org for a quick review before > uploading (I have no idea whether dgit supports security-master). I'll send you a debdiff, thanks. I guess I'll find out whether dgit does work or not. I need to check the armhf build, since there are conflicts there. I don...

...a broken system (e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more recently on the upstream mailing list http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702337 I'm happy to overhaul this document and submit a debdiff for the release team to review - please confirm if this work should go ahead. No other files in the package will be changed.

...ave it in a good shape now. The details of the conversation is available in the Ubuntu BTS here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen-api/+bug/1033899 This version of the package includes the /etc/pam.d modification that have been suggested by Steve, and which are showing in the attached debdiff. Please unblock xen-api/1.3.2-11 Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xen-api_1.3.2-11.debdiff Type: text/x-diff Size: 1426 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attac...

...urity fixes that cause regressions. However upstream has an automated testing machinery (osstest) that only allows a commit in the upstream stable branch if all test pass. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] This security fix is based on the latest upstream stable-4.17 branch. The branch in general only accepts bug fixes and does not allow new features, so the changes there are mainly security and other bug fixes. This does not strictly follow the "on...

On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 19:51 -0500, Misha Brukman wrote: > The second one is a "serious policy violation", which isn't as clear to > me what the bug reporter is saying, but it mentions warnings during > doxygen build and missing fonts and related issues that I'm not quite > following. (CCing the bug and thus the submitter) sounds like a missing built-depends, at

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-5.7 Severity: important After Upgrading to xen-utils 4.0.1-5.7 my pygrub Xen VMs won't boot. Running pygrub manually shows: /usr/lib/xen-default/bin/pygrub --args=root="/dev/xvda ro" --output=/tmp/foo /dev/vg0/vm-disk Using <class 'grub.GrubConf.Grub2ConfigFile'> to parse /boot/grub/grub.cfg WARNING:root:Unknown directive

Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"): > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:06:07PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I have fixed these in stretch but the jessie package remains unfixed. > > I think I may be able to find some backports somewhere. Would that be > > useful ? Is anyone else working on this ? > >

...shed preparing the Xen-4.5 merge from experimental into our next > release (Vivid/15.04). And something I actually should have done since the 4.4 > times is to report back the delta I have in case there are things Debian might > want to pick up as well. > > So below is the commented debdiff between the 4.5.0-1 in experimental and the > Ubuntu version I prepared so far (only compile tested on x86 at the time of > writing this). > > Regards, > Stefan > > [Excluding changelog and the maintainer change in control] > > First hunk in the following diff is just...

...5 merge from experimental into our next > > release (Vivid/15.04). And something I actually should have done since the 4.4 > > times is to report back the delta I have in case there are things Debian might > > want to pick up as well. > > > > So below is the commented debdiff between the 4.5.0-1 in experimental and the > > Ubuntu version I prepared so far (only compile tested on x86 at the time of > > writing this). > > > > Regards, > > Stefan > > > > [Excluding changelog and the maintainer change in control] > > > &...

Hi everyone at the security team, I'd like to upload an update of xen-qemu-dm-4.0 in Squeeze. Below is the Xen Security Advisory as I received it, attached is the patch that they provided. Both the debdiff and the updated packages are available in here: http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/xen-qemu-dm-4.0/ Please allow me to upload this fix. If you wish, I can prepare a DSA as well (but probably what's below is enough for you guys to prepare one), just let me know. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (...

...an aditionnal third patch [1] I required, but that one isn't authored by me. I would be grateful if you integrate it in your next release as well. Best Regards, Ben. [0] https://buildroot.org [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=846679;filename=syslinux_6.03%2Bdfsg-14.1.debdiff;msg=10 Beno?t Allard (2): memdisk: Force ld output format to 32-bits utils: Use the host toolchain to build. memdisk/Makefile | 2 +- utils/Makefile | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4

Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"): > Yes, the distribution line should be jessie-security, but please send > a debdiff to team at security.debian.org for a quick review before > uploading (I have no idea whether dgit supports security-master). Here is the proposed debdiff (actually, a git diff) for xen in jessie. My ARM test build is still running but I think it's going to work. I have actually tested the...

Package: xen Version: 4.0.1-1 Tags: patch Here is a patch to get rid off the obvious problem with string exceptions, and to change to rules to build with python2.6. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: xen.debdiff URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20100912/cb04d61b/attachment.txt>

...lease team accept to unblock the package so that it migrates to Wheezy? If not, please let me know which of the above fixes isn't acceptable. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: xen-api_1.3.2-12.debdiff URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20121024/ddaed03f/attachment-0001.ksh>

...e most annoying remaining bug in this package. Appart from this remaining one, I don't think more bugfix in this package will be needed before Wheezy. XCP is otherwise perfectly functional, IMO. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xen-api_1.3.2-13.debdiff Type: text/x-diff Size: 3757 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20121118/f31eed54/attachment.diff>

...bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites through point releases: squeeze (6.0.7) - use target "stable" Please prepare a minimal-changes upload targetting each of these suites, and submit a debdiff to the Release Team [0] for consideration. They will offer additional guidance or instruct you to upload your package. I will happily assist you at any stage if the patch is straightforward and you need help. Please keep me in CC at all times so I can track [1] the progress of this request. For d...

Hi, currently there is a bug report about CVE-2013-1428 in Ubuntu ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tinc/+bug/1174763). Are there any changes in Makefile or dependencies which make it necessary to adjust a packaging system or does it suffice to adjust version numbers and source-code url? Thanx, Renne -------------- n?chster Teil -------------- Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde

...xperimental into our next >>> release (Vivid/15.04). And something I actually should have done since the 4.4 >>> times is to report back the delta I have in case there are things Debian might >>> want to pick up as well. >>> >>> So below is the commented debdiff between the 4.5.0-1 in experimental and the >>> Ubuntu version I prepared so far (only compile tested on x86 at the time of >>> writing this). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Stefan >>> >>> [Excluding changelog and the maintainer change in control...