search for: deafened

I'm actually not using 0.9 yet. I have my CD collection archived in 0.8 format, and I want to keep my ID3 tags. If someone can whip up a script that lets me extract my ID3 tags to a file for each file, decompress into WAV, then recompress into 0.9 format, then re-integrate the ID3 data, that'd be good. Otherwise. I'll be stuck in 0.8 forever. Which I don't want.... -- Asheesh.

yeah, I would say hold off on a big conversion until 1.0. chances are low now that the format will change but it could happen. glad to hear from everyone that it's working. the only major hangup left seems to be seeking, which I am working on. 1.0 should be out in less than a month, at which time my 600+ CD collection goes in. "I'm not just the president... I'm also a

This will post-pend id3v1 tags. I thought they were found at the beginning of files. If not, then it looks fine to me. I may add some parentheses, though, like (tail -c 128 ${f} > tag) && (flac-0.8 -d $f ${f%flac}wav), etc. That decoding line should be "${f%.flac}", no "*", right? For simplicity's sake, I'm not going to take off the "." at the

This will post-pend id3v1 tags. I thought they were found at the beginning of files. If not, then it looks fine to me. I may add some parentheses, though, like (tail -c 128 ${f} > tag) && (flac-0.8 -d $f ${f%flac}wav), etc. That decoding line should be "${f%.flac}", no "*", right? Same with the encoding command: flac-0.9 -V ${f%flac}wav $f Seem better? (-8

I haven't seen too much feedback since the 0.9 release, which probably means one of three things: 1. it works perfectly and nobody has any complaints! 2. nobody is using 0.9. 3. the list is having problems. I mention #3 because at least one person has been blocked by sourceforge's new filter. Anyone...anyone? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email

if your talking id3v1, something along the lines of (in bash): for f in *.flac ; do tail -c 128 $f > tag && flac-0.8 -d $f ${f%*.flac}.wav && flac-0.9 -V ${f%*.flac}.wav $f && cat tag >> $f ; done should work. of course, test it before you set it loose on your whole collection. if you're on windows, my condolences... no wait, just get cygwin :) Josh ---

Folks, I like criticism! Please give me lots of it - particularly in respect of the updated "Samba-Guide". It should now be up on the Samba mirror sites. You can download it from: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf I have incorporated all feedback into this book. Did I get it right this time or should I give up? So far, not a word of feedback is deafening! Is it

This is a follow-up to a message I posted yesterday concerning building R-1.6.2. After a deafening silence regarding that first message I decided to be fool-hardy and just comment out the line that seemed to be giving trouble in the file /usr/include/sys/stream.h. This worked for a while, but soon another error resulted:

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2014-12-18, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> >> You could also address the email to yourself on a different mail server >> than the one your sending it from. I send to the list on gmail and >> address a copy to myself on AOL. > > That won't help indicate whether

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to it.... >> > > Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one has > deafened me! :-)) > Only if someone else has seen the same symptoms. I've got one box that hangs every few weeks but I'm guessing it is something hardware related... -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

...ith a USB headset and are making outbound calls using IAX with ulaw encoding to our voip provider. We're running asterisk 1.4 Users are complaining that the ring tone generated by asterisk is much louder than the voice call once connected. They are having to turn the volume down to avoid being deafened by the ring tone, but then have an unacceptably low volume for the voice call. Can anyone suggest what might be the problem here, or steps I could take to address it? Thanks, Russell.

With the deafening silence from my previous questions, I feel seriously alone in the desire to have ChanSpy available. I want to be able to perform a "ZapBarge" on an Agents conversation, and ChanSpy was the answer to my prayers. Bug #2379 (http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002379) was closed "bkw918 10-27-04 17:06 Closed pending new changes in cvs-head."

If I execute, e.g. > x <- round(runif(20,0,1),2) > y <- round(runif(20,0,1),2) > plot(x,y,xlim=c(0,1),ylim=c(0,1)) > identify(x,y,n=1,plot=F) then I get the index of the identified point printed in the command window, and ***initially*** the index is NOT displayed in the graphics window (which is the behaviour I had hoped and expected to obtain by setting ``plot=F'').

In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was

Hi all About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc, samba3x-domainjoin-gui,

On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote: > On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote: >> Hi all >> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 >> server >> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. >> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would >> normally do I checked for Centos

...at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > > On 2014-12-18, Mark LaPierre wrote: > >> > >><snip> > > Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to it.... > Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one has deafened me! :-)) But I know real life and other obligations and ... may prevent any response, so it doesn't bother me .... much! ;-) Bill

On 06/09/2015 12:33 AM, tony at softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield) wrote: > In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, > Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: >> When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that >> "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using >> since almost forever.

I'm trying to get the coefficient of partial determination for each of three independent variables. I've tried mvr in package pls.pcr. I'm a little confused by the output. I'm curious how I can order the LV's according to their names rather than their relative contribution to the regression. For instance, using the crabs data from MASS I made a regression of FL~RW+noise

Is it possible to boot the Live CD through PXE? I've tried using Red Hat's PXE setup tool but have been unsuccessful. Thanks, Kirk Bocek