search for: ddoses

Dear All, I have a pair of .cpp and .def file can be compiled using VC++ and works perfectly well in S-PLUS. I wanted to do the same for R; so I followed the guidline given in "Building from a source-code library under Windows" as much as possible and manage to compile them using VC++ and call it from R. But it gives different answer from the one called from S-Plus. I know that I did

Hi Joshua HTTP is used on in our setup on 127.0.0.1/mxml?<command> to send commands to the server, such as http://127.0.0.1/mxml?action=login&username=myuser&secret=thesecret to log in and then http://127.0.0.1/mxml?ActionID=123&Action=BlindTransfer&Channel=Channel&Context=local&Exten=123&Priority=1 etc. to control transfers, for example. ARI is not being

Hi Joshua No back-off, but I am caching the last 5000 results and and first hitting the cache to see if a recent command already provided the information I'm seeking for a particular request. I'll see if I can do some simulation and see if I'm effectively DDOSing the local HTTP interface. I'll have to see if I maybe have a resource leak in my code that makes the HTTP request,

...ch is a problem of engineering design of how the network operates (untrusted anything can talk to untrusted anything) > > I?m not sure how you mean that comment. > > If you?re saying that the Internet is badly designed and that we need to rip it up and replace it before we can address DDoSes, you?re trying to boil the ocean. We have real-world practical solutions available to us that do not require a complete redesign of the Internet. One of those is to tighten down CentOS boxes so they don?t get coopted into botnets. > > If instead you?re saying that DDoSes are solvable with...

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Bob Marcan wrote: >> >> 1FuckingPrettyRose >> "Sorry, you must use no fewer than 20 total characters." >> 1FuckingPrettyRoseShovedUpYourAssIfYouDon'tGiveMeAccessRightFuckingNow! >> "Sorry, you cannot use punctuation."

...Other than DDoS which is a problem of engineering design of how the network operates (untrusted anything can talk to untrusted anything) I?m not sure how you mean that comment. If you?re saying that the Internet is badly designed and that we need to rip it up and replace it before we can address DDoSes, you?re trying to boil the ocean. We have real-world practical solutions available to us that do not require a complete redesign of the Internet. One of those is to tighten down CentOS boxes so they don?t get coopted into botnets. If instead you?re saying that DDoSes are solvable with ?just? a b...

I was wondering if anyone is running Quagga on Xen? What is throughput/latency like? Was looking for about a gig of mixed packet size BGP throughput. Hardware is Opteron 4 Way Quad cores, was thinking paravirt with a couple of dedicated cores and maybe the addition of Solarflare 10GB Direct IO NICs might give the required performance level but I am unsure. The other option is multi-queue Intel

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:32 AM Stefan Viljoen <viljoens at verishare.co.za> wrote: > Hi Joshua > > HTTP is used on in our setup on > > 127.0.0.1/mxml?<command> > > to send commands to the server, such as > > http://127.0.0.1/mxml?action=login&username=myuser&secret=thesecret > > to log in and then > > >

Hi, can i configure dovecot to limit the max number of login concurencly? I read in documentation that there is "mail_max_userip_connections", but in this way i limit the login that come from same ip. If the same user tries to connect from different ip, he succeeds. Can i do it? Thanks

I know someone who for the past 4 days has been having the heck ddosed out of him. He runs a gaming server, and ran a report on the ddos; he has 8 pages of that and a few hours ago there were 16 pages. They''re attacking his machine on random ports and he blocks UDP traffic on those ports, but they keep attacking on other ports. So far he''s banned over 800,000 IP''s.

...the DDoS attack, and you either get blown off or transferred to their sales department to buy a ?solution? to a problem they allow to exist because it brings in extra revenue. Your ISP could block this kind of thing at its border. Your ISP could also use their alliances with fellow ISPs to block DDoSes at their source. They do neither. >> fail2ban isn?t in the stock package repo for CentOS 7 > > Didn?t realize that. Brilliant move, removing it? (rolls eyes at RH)? It wasn?t removed. fail2ban has *never* been in the stock CentOS package repos. It?s always been a third-party thing...